| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Brune
|
Professional |
7
|
2 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Legal task | A team within a law firm, supervised by Ms. Trzaskoma, gathered information about potential juror... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury selection discussion | A discussion occurred regarding potential juror Catherine Conrad. It was discovered via a Google ... | N/A | View |
| N/A | Jury selection (voir dire) | A discussion took place regarding whether to keep or strike potential juror Catherine Conrad afte... | N/A | View |
| 2012-02-15 | N/A | Court proceeding date listed in header. | Southern District (likely S... | View |
| 2008-01-01 | Medical event | Theresa began experiencing severe dizziness and other health problems. | N/A | View |
| 2008-01-01 | N/A | Theresa began experiencing severe health episodes (dizziness, palpitations) | Unknown | View |
This document is page 6 of a legal filing (Case 1:09-cr-00581-WHP) from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III, dated March 7, 2013. It primarily serves as a character reference for a defendant named 'David,' detailing his 15 years of volunteer work as a youth sports coach in Hinsdale and his role as a father. A footnote discusses the serious health issues of an individual named Theresa (referenced via a letter from Theresa Parse) dating back to 2008.
This document is a page from a court transcript (filed August 4, 2022) featuring the direct testimony of a witness named Brune. Brune describes a conversation with colleagues Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein (Theresa) while walking to 52 Duane, concerning suspicions that 'Juror No. 1' might be a suspended lawyer. They discuss the juror's background revealed during voir dire, specifically a personal injury suit in the Bronx, and the juror's use of legal concepts like 'vicarious liability' and 'respondeat superior' which the witness notes are out of place in a criminal case.
This document is a page from a legal transcript where a witness named Brune is being questioned about jury selection. Brune recounts how a colleague, Theresa, found a suspended lawyer on Google with the same name as a potential juror, Catherine Conrad. Brune then describes a strategic discussion with a jury consultant who advised striking Conrad from the jury, fearing she would be overly focused on personal responsibility rather than the government's burden of proof.
This document is a page from a legal transcript dated March 22, 2022, detailing the testimony of a witness named Brune. Brune is being questioned about his law firm's process for jury selection, confirming that his partner, Ms. Trzaskoma (also called Theresa), was heavily involved in the details of gathering information on jurors, while he maintained ultimate responsibility and a supervisory role. The effort was collaborative, also involving two lawyers from San Francisco.
This document is a concordance (word index) page from a court transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States of America v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' (Case 1:20-cv-03088-PAE, Document 646-20). While filed within a docket often associated with Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cv-03088 is Giuffre v. Maxwell), the document itself pertains to the Daugerdas tax fraud case, likely serving as a legal precedent or exhibit. The index lists occurrences of words starting with 'T' (testify, Theresa, Trzaskoma, trial, truth, etc.) and their corresponding page/line numbers in the full transcript.
This document is page 6 of a legal letter dated March 7, 2013, from the law firm Zuckerman Spaeder LLP to Judge William H. Pauley, III. The letter provides character references for a man named David, highlighting his 15 years of dedicated volunteer coaching for youth sports in his community. It includes quotes from letters by community members Phil Allen, Thomas E. Carnaghi, and John and Kathryne Maguire, all of whom praise David's commitment and positive impact. A footnote also details the serious health issues of a woman named Theresa Parse since 2008.
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) filed on February 24, 2022. It details the direct examination of a witness by an attorney named Brune. The witness recounts a conversation with Ms. Trzaskoma and Ms. Edelstein while heading to 52 Duane, where they speculated that 'Juror No. 1' might be a suspended lawyer, referencing a personal injury suit in the Bronx and legal concepts like vicarious liability.
This document is a deposition transcript page where a witness named Brune recounts discussions about a potential juror, Catherine Conrad, during voir dire. A colleague named Theresa discovered a suspended lawyer with the same name, and a jury consultant advised striking Conrad from the jury, arguing that as a recovering alcoholic, she would likely focus more on personal responsibility than the government's burden of proof.
This document is a court transcript excerpt from a direct examination of a witness named Brune, filed on February 24, 2022. The testimony focuses on the roles and responsibilities for jury selection within Brune's law firm for a particular case. Brune clarifies that while they were ultimately responsible, a partner named Ms. Trzaskoma was more deeply involved in the details and supervised other lawyers in gathering information on potential jurors.
This document is a concordance (word index) page from a legal transcript dated February 15, 2012, for the case 'United States v. Paul M. Daugerdas, et al.' It was filed as Exhibit A-5696 in Case 1:20-cr-00330 (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) on February 24, 2022. The index lists words starting with 'T' (testify, Texas, Theresa, Trzaskoma, trial, etc.) alongside their corresponding page and line numbers in the original transcript. Notable entries include 'Trzaskoma' (mentioned 41 times) and 'trial' (mentioned 103 times).
A letter cited in a footnote regarding Theresa Parse's health problems.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity