HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740.jpg

1.96 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / law review article / congressional oversight evidence
File Size: 1.96 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, attributed to attorney David Schoen, discussing proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 18, 20, and 21). The text argues for integrating the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) into these rules, specifically requiring courts and U.S. Attorneys to consider victims' views and objections before transferring cases between districts. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.

People (2)

Name Role Context
David Schoen Author / Attorney
Name appears at the bottom of the document, indicating authorship or submission of the legal analysis regarding victi...
Wright Legal Scholar
Cited in footnote 198 regarding Federal Practice and Procedure.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
BYU Law Review
Publisher of the cited text (2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835).
United States Attorneys
Mentioned in the context of Rule 20 regarding case transfers.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740'.

Locations (2)

Location Context
General legal jurisdiction where an indictment is pending.
General legal jurisdiction where a defendant is arrested or held.

Relationships (1)

David Schoen Attorney/Client (Contextual) Epstein (Implied)
While not explicitly stated in the text, David Schoen is a known attorney for Epstein. The document bears his name and a House Oversight stamp, suggesting it was part of the investigation into the handling of the Epstein case or CVRA violations.

Key Quotes (3)

"This change helps to implement a victim's right under the CVRA to be treated 'with fairness.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740.jpg
Quote #1
"If any victim objects to the transfer, the United States attorney in the transferring district or the victim's attorney shall advise the court where the indictment or information is pending of the victim's concerns."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740.jpg
Quote #2
"The court shall not transfer any proceeding without giving any victim an opportunity to be heard."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,434 characters)

Page 26 of 52
2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835, *879
This change helps to implement a victim's right under the CVRA to be treated "with fairness." 196 The rule change is modest.
Rule 18 already requires the court to consider the convenience of the "witnesses" in a case. In many cases, of course, the victim
will be a witness. But for clarity in those cases, and to account for cases in which the victim will not be a witness, the rule
should be amended to refer specifically to victims.
Rule 20 - Victims' Views Considered Regarding Consensual Transfer
The Proposal:
Rule 20 should be amended to allow the court to consider the victims' views in any decision to transfer a case as follows:
(a) Consent to Transfer. A prosecution may be transferred from the district where the indictment or information is pending, or
from which a warrant on a complaint has been issued, to the district where the defendant is arrested, held, or present if:
(1) the defendant states in writing a wish to plead guilty or nolo contendere and to waive trial in the district where the
indictment, information, or complaint is pending, consents in writing to the court's disposing of the case in the transferee
district, and files the statement in the transferee district; and
(2) the United States attorneys in both districts approve the transfer in writing after consultation with any victim. If any victim
objects to the transfer, the United States attorney in the transferring district or the victim's attorney shall advise the court where
the indictment or information is pending of the victim's concerns.
A similar change should be made to Rule 20(d) regarding transfer of juvenile proceedings.
[*880]
The Rationale:
As with the previous proposal, this change implements the victim's right under the CVRA to be "treated with fairness." 197
The procedure for transferring a case for a plea is not constitutionally required, but rather is designed for the convenience of the
defendant and the government. 198 In considering whether such administrative reasons justify a transfer, the concerns of the
victim appropriately enter into the balance. For reasons similar to those discussed above in connection with changes regarding
plea procedures, the prosecution would be directed to confer with the victim and to advise the court of any objection to the
transfer. 199
Rule 21 - Victims' Views Considered Regarding Transfer for Prejudice
The Proposal:
Rule 21 should be amended as follows to require consideration of the victim's interest in whether a case should be transferred:
(e) Victims' Views. The court shall not transfer any proceeding without giving any victim an opportunity to be heard. The court
shall consider the views of the victim in making any transfer decision.
The Rationale:
Rule 21 authorizes the trial judge to transfer a case to avoid prejudice or for the convenience of the parties. The proposed rule
would require that the court consider the victim's concerns in making any such transfer decision. Such consideration would
seem to be part and parcel of protecting the victim's right to be "treated with fairness." In addition, the vicinage provision of
_________________________________
196 18 U.S.C.A. 3771(a)(8) (West 2004 & Supp. 2005).
197 Id. 3771(a)(8).
198 See generally Wright, Federal Practice and Procedure 321, at 357-58.
199 See supra notes 158-174 and accompanying text.
DAVID SCHOEN
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document