This document is a page from a 2005 BYU Law Review article, attributed to attorney David Schoen, discussing proposed amendments to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 18, 20, and 21). The text argues for integrating the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) into these rules, specifically requiring courts and U.S. Attorneys to consider victims' views and objections before transferring cases between districts. The document bears a House Oversight Bates stamp, indicating its inclusion in a congressional investigation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| David Schoen | Author / Attorney |
Name appears at the bottom of the document, indicating authorship or submission of the legal analysis regarding victi...
|
| Wright | Legal Scholar |
Cited in footnote 198 regarding Federal Practice and Procedure.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| BYU Law Review |
Publisher of the cited text (2005 B.Y.U.L. Rev. 835).
|
|
| United States Attorneys |
Mentioned in the context of Rule 20 regarding case transfers.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017740'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
General legal jurisdiction where an indictment is pending.
|
|
|
General legal jurisdiction where a defendant is arrested or held.
|
"This change helps to implement a victim's right under the CVRA to be treated 'with fairness.'"Source
"If any victim objects to the transfer, the United States attorney in the transferring district or the victim's attorney shall advise the court where the indictment or information is pending of the victim's concerns."Source
"The court shall not transfer any proceeding without giving any victim an opportunity to be heard."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,434 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document