EFTA00026834.pdf
105 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain / legal correspondence
File Size:
105 KB
Summary
This document is an email chain from October 2020 regarding a privilege review of an Epstein search warrant database ('Epstein SW returns'). The legal team discusses identifying and removing privileged communications involving Epstein's attorneys (specifically Jack Goldberger and 'Marty') and private investigator Roy Black. The emails also clarify that Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback represent the estate's co-executors, Darren Indyke and a redacted individual.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Deceased; estate and past legal representation discussed.
|
| Marc Weinstein | Attorney |
Represents the co-executors of the Epstein estate.
|
| Andrew Tomback | Attorney |
Represents the co-executors of the Epstein estate.
|
| Darren Indyke | Co-executor |
Co-executor of the Epstein estate.
|
| Roy Black | Private Investigator |
Investigator hired by Epstein for criminal investigation and civil litigation in Florida; emails/reports found in dat...
|
| Jack Goldberger | Attorney |
Represented Epstein; his emails were flagged for privilege review.
|
| Marty | Attorney |
Described as 'a different attorney for Epstein'.
|
| Alex | Unknown (Likely Legal Team) |
Mentioned in email: 'Have you or Alex been dealing with Marc or Andrew?'
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Epstein Estate |
Subject of legal representation discussions.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2020-10-11
Privilege review of Epstein search warrant database identified emails from attorney Jack Goldberger.
N/A
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of criminal investigation and civil litigation where Roy Black was hired.
|
Relationships (4)
Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback represent the co-executors of the estate (Darren Indyke...)
Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback represent the co-executors of the estate (Darren Indyke...)
Epstein hired private investigators... among others, an investigator named Roy Black.
Jack Goldberger, who represented Epstein
Key Quotes (4)
"Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback represent the co-executors of the estate (Darren Indyke and [Redacted])."Source
EFTA00026834.pdf
Quote #1
"In our review of this database, we have come across some communications (emails and reports)from private investigators— among others, an investigator named Roy Black."Source
EFTA00026834.pdf
Quote #2
"That is Jack Goldberger’s email address. I’ll ask to have the Goldberger hits pulled now..."Source
EFTA00026834.pdf
Quote #3
"Marty is a different attorney for Epstein."Source
EFTA00026834.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (3,524 characters)
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:26:48 +0000
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 2020 17:26:48 +0000
The email you just forwarded us sounds like it’s referring to what I was talking about— Marty is a different
attorney for Epstein.
attorney for Epstein.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2020, at 1:15 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
I’ve never dealt with them. Have you or Alex been dealing with Marc or Andrew?
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 1:06 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 1:06 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Marc Weinstein and Andrew Tomback represent the co-executors of the estate (Darren Indyke and [Redacted]).
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2020, at 12:55 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Who represents the estate?
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 12:52 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 12:52 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Hi [Redacted],
Thanks— from what I remember, the estate communicated with you directly about this, so I don’t remember getting a
list.
list.
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2020, at 12:38 PM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Hi [Redacted],
Hope you’re well too. Did Epstein’s lawyers also give you the list of attorneys? And can you remind me who they
are?
are?
EFTA00026834
Thanks, [Redacted]
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 11:50 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 11:50 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein SW returns
Hi [Redacted],
Hope you’re doing well, and thanks very much for your help with privilege issues for this review. In our review of this
database, we have come across some communications (emails and reports)from private investigators— among
others, an investigator named Roy Black. We are generally aware that Epstein hired private investigators in
connection with a criminal investigation and related civil litigation in Florida.
database, we have come across some communications (emails and reports)from private investigators— among
others, an investigator named Roy Black. We are generally aware that Epstein hired private investigators in
connection with a criminal investigation and related civil litigation in Florida.
We don’t know whether these materials are privileged. Could you possibly confer with the estate attorneys to
determine whether they are asserting a privilege over communications by private investigators? In the meantime, we
will stop reviewing the database unless we hear from you otherwise.
determine whether they are asserting a privilege over communications by private investigators? In the meantime, we
will stop reviewing the database unless we hear from you otherwise.
Thanks very much,
[Redacted]
Sent from my iPhone
On Oct 12, 2020, at 10:53 AM, [Redacted] <[Redacted]> wrote:
Thanks very much, [Redacted].
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 10:51 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Monday, October 12, 2020 10:51 AM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein SW returns
The Goldberger hits have been moved out.
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 5:14 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 5:14 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein SW returns
That is Jack Goldberger’s email address. I’ll ask to have the Goldberger hits pulled now and will let you know when
they are moved out.
they are moved out.
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 12:52 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein SW returns
Sent: Sunday, October 11, 2020 12:52 PM
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein SW returns
EFTA00026835
Hi [Redacted],
For the Epstein search warrant database, I saw an email from the following email address that I wanted to flag for
further privilege review, because it may belong to Jack Goldberger, who represented Epstein:
further privilege review, because it may belong to Jack Goldberger, who represented Epstein:
[Redacted]
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted Box]
EFTA00026836
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document