This document is page 29 of a deposition transcript, likely from September 29, 2010. It captures a contentious exchange between two attorneys, Mr. Tein and Mr. Leopold, over questioning procedure before Mr. Tein asks the witness about a conversation she had with a woman at Jeffrey Epstein's house. Mr. Leopold objects to the question, citing lack of foundation and predicate.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. TEIN | Attorney |
Questioning a witness during a deposition.
|
| MR. LEOPOLD | Attorney |
Representing the witness and making objections to questions from Mr. Tein.
|
| Epstein | Property owner |
Mentioned as the owner of the house where an alleged conversation took place.
|
| Unnamed witness | Deponent |
The individual being questioned by Mr. Tein, referred to as "her" and "you".
|
| Unnamed woman | Individual present at Epstein's house |
Allegedly walked the witness upstairs in Epstein's house and had a conversation with her.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| HOUSE_OVERSIGHT |
Mentioned in the document footer (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012424), suggesting a connection to a U.S. House of Representatives...
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location where the witness was allegedly walked upstairs by a woman.
|
|
|
The state from which the witness had allegedly "just moved down from".
|
"I'm not going to stop speaking. I'm going to continue to make the record."Source
"You're obstructing. Please stop."Source
"Do you want to try to refresh your memory as to whether you had any conversation with the woman who walked you upstairs in Epstein's house in which you told her that you went to college and had just moved down from Ohio?"Source
"Objection. Object to the form of the question. Lack of foundation and predicate."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,392 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document