This document is a page from a court transcript dated September 3, 2019. It captures a dialogue between a judge and an attorney, Mr. Weingarten, regarding the government's motion to dismiss an indictment. Mr. Weingarten clarifies that while his clients want the court to investigate the underlying events, they ultimately support the motion to dismiss the indictment itself.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the case, questioning Mr. Weingarten on his position regarding a motion.
|
| Mr. Weingarten | Attorney |
Responding to the Court's questions on behalf of his client regarding a motion to dismiss an indictment.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| U.S. Attorney | Government agency |
Mentioned as the entity making an application for a nolle prosequi order.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that transcribed the proceeding.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
"We want you to stay on the case, we want you to conduct an investigation, and we want to know what happened here."Source
"So you're suggesting that you support the government's motion, just viewed in the context of --"Source
"Yes, of course."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,317 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document