This document is a page from a rough draft deposition transcript involving an interrogation by Mr. Simpson. The questioning focuses on establishing the factual basis for allegations concerning 'other minors' known by the witness as of December 30, 2014. Attorney Mr. Scarola interrupts to instruct the witness not to answer based on privilege, leading to a debate about separating privileged legal strategy from non-privileged factual information.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Mr. Simpson | Attorney / Questioner |
Conducting the examination and asking the witness to separate privileged information from factual basis.
|
| Mr. Scarola | Attorney |
Intervenes to instruct the witness not to answer based on privilege. Referred to as 'Jack' by Mr. Simpson.
|
| Witness (A.) | Deponent |
Unnamed on this specific page; answering questions regarding allegations about minors.
|
| Jack | Attorney |
First name of Mr. Scarola, used by Mr. Simpson.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Inferred from the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021879'.
|
"Let me ask this way: We have talked somewhat about the basis for this allegation about other minors."Source
"tell me what you knew as of December 30th, 2014, that formed the factual basis for your -- for that allegation about other minors?"Source
"MR. SCAROLA: And I'll instruct you not to answer that question for the same reason that when the same question was asked earlier, I instructed you not to answer."Source
"I'm asking you to tell me the nonprivileged information -- and I'm not agreeing with your privilege"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,312 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document