DOJ-OGR-00016480.jpg
627 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
627 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell) filed on August 10, 2022. A government prosecutor addresses the Court regarding the potential calling of a rebuttal expert and the logistics of closing arguments, specifically how to present sealed exhibits to the jury without making them public. The speaker emphasizes coordination with the defense to ensure the process runs smoothly.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unidentified Speaker | Prosecutor/Government Representative |
Speaking to the court regarding the rebuttal case and closing arguments mechanics.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Addressed by the speaker regarding procedural rulings.
|
| Defense | Legal Counsel |
Opposing counsel whom the government plans to coordinate with regarding exhibits.
|
| Jury | Jurors |
Mentioned in the context of viewing sealed exhibits without public disclosure.
|
| Potential Rebuttal Expert | Expert Witness |
An unidentified expert the government may call depending on the defense's case.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government |
The prosecution team.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer code DOJ-OGR-00016480).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceedings regarding trial logistics, specifically discussion of a potential rebuttal expert and the handling of sealed exhibits during closing arguments.
Courtroom (implied Southern District of New York based on case number context)
Relationships (1)
Speaker discusses working with the defense on the 'choreography' of closing arguments and exhibit presentation.
Key Quotes (4)
"Whether or not we end up calling the expert we can't determine without seeing the defense case first."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016480.jpg
Quote #1
"the government will be prepared to close the day after the conclusion of the defense case"Source
DOJ-OGR-00016480.jpg
Quote #2
"closings would work, given the fact that there are sealed exhibits and some public exhibits."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016480.jpg
Quote #3
"the jury can see exhibits without them being shown publicly."Source
DOJ-OGR-00016480.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,718 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 264 of 267 2292
LCAVMAX8
LCAVMAX8
1 information about the rebuttal case, we have noticed -- we have
2 noticed a potential rebuttal expert. Whether or not we end up
3 calling the expert we can't determine without seeing the
4 defense case first. But that's the full scope of what we've
5 noticed at this juncture. And I'm not sure whether or not we
6 would call that expert. It would depend entirely on the
7 defense case. So that's the scope of what we're discussing.
8 Again, with respect to timing, we'll take it as it
9 comes. And I think the Court has noted that this issue is
10 premature, but we just wanted to assure the Court the
11 government will be prepared to close the day after the
12 conclusion of the defense case and would very much like to move
13 forward.
14 With respect to closings, we did want to just preview
15 that -- and we plan to work with the defense on this issue.
16 But we wanted to start thinking ahead the mechanics of how
17 closings would work, given the fact that there are sealed
18 exhibits and some public exhibits.
19 And so we've started thinking through that, but wanted
20 to just flag that that's a mechanical issue that we'll want to
21 work through with the defense so that everyone has an
22 opportunity to present what they need to without any hiccups,
23 and also so that the jury can see exhibits without them being
24 shown publicly. And so we'll work with the defense on that
25 choreography to make sure that that runs smoothly. And we'll
2 noticed a potential rebuttal expert. Whether or not we end up
3 calling the expert we can't determine without seeing the
4 defense case first. But that's the full scope of what we've
5 noticed at this juncture. And I'm not sure whether or not we
6 would call that expert. It would depend entirely on the
7 defense case. So that's the scope of what we're discussing.
8 Again, with respect to timing, we'll take it as it
9 comes. And I think the Court has noted that this issue is
10 premature, but we just wanted to assure the Court the
11 government will be prepared to close the day after the
12 conclusion of the defense case and would very much like to move
13 forward.
14 With respect to closings, we did want to just preview
15 that -- and we plan to work with the defense on this issue.
16 But we wanted to start thinking ahead the mechanics of how
17 closings would work, given the fact that there are sealed
18 exhibits and some public exhibits.
19 And so we've started thinking through that, but wanted
20 to just flag that that's a mechanical issue that we'll want to
21 work through with the defense so that everyone has an
22 opportunity to present what they need to without any hiccups,
23 and also so that the jury can see exhibits without them being
24 shown publicly. And so we'll work with the defense on that
25 choreography to make sure that that runs smoothly. And we'll
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016480
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document