EFTA00014647.pdf
37.9 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email correspondence
File Size:
37.9 KB
Summary
This document is an email thread from November 2021 between defense attorney Christian Everdell and an Assistant United States Attorney for the SDNY. They are negotiating the specific wording of a legal stipulation regarding a partial transcript of a witness's trial testimony given on a February 26th. The names of several other attorneys (Sternheim, Menninger, Pagliuca) appear in the CC line.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Christian Everdell | Attorney / Sender |
Defense attorney communicating with the US Government regarding a stipulation.
|
| Bobbi C. Sternheim | Attorney / CC Recipient |
Copied on legal correspondence.
|
| Laura Menninger | Attorney / CC Recipient |
Copied on legal correspondence.
|
| Jeff Pagliuca | Attorney / CC Recipient |
Copied on legal correspondence.
|
| [Redacted] | Assistant United States Attorney |
Sender of the original email regarding the stipulation wording.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York |
Office of the Assistant United States Attorney involved in the correspondence.
|
|
| US Government |
Referred to as 'the government' in the email.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction of the Assistant United States Attorney.
|
Relationships (2)
Copied on the same legal emails representing the defense.
Copied on the same legal emails representing the defense.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,192 characters)
From: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>
To: "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]; "Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq." <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED]; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>, Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Stip
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 02:03:31 +0000
Attachments: Stipulation [REDACTED]_Trial_Testimony.DOCX
To: "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]; "Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq." <[REDACTED]>; [REDACTED]; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>, Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>
Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Stip
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 02:03:31 +0000
Attachments: Stipulation [REDACTED]_Trial_Testimony.DOCX
[REDACTED] -
Following-up on our conversation today, is the revised stipulation acceptable to the government?
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 7:03 PM
To: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]; Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq. [REDACTED]; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Stip
Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2021 7:03 PM
To: Christian Everdell <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]; Bobbi C. Sternheim, Esq. [REDACTED]; Laura Menninger <[REDACTED]>; Jeff Pagliuca <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Stip
Hey Chris,
Following up on our conversation today regarding the stip, would you agree to have the sentence say that the document is a "true and accurate copy of the transcript of one witness's trial testimony, but not the full trial transcript, given on February 26 . . . ."? If so, we are fine with the stip – and, of course, happy to consider other language that makes the same point.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Assistant United States Attorney
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Southern District of New York
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
EFTA00014647
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document