Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
The jury selection process for a trial that was expected to be very long. A key issue was the availability of jurors. A potential juror with a criminal record (turnstile jumping, lookout for burglary) was considered but not challenged.
Participants (3)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Jurors | person | 0 | View Entity |
| Ms. Brune | person | 82 | View Entity |
| Judge Pauley | person | 146 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00009336.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding the jury selection (voir dire) process for a lengthy, three-month trial. The questioning focuses on the decision not to challenge a potential juror with a criminal history and confirms that juror availability was a significant issue, which Judge Pauley addressed with the jury pool from the beginning.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Direct examination of Ms. Brune regarding her knowledge and actions during the voir dire process.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
Voir dire, the process of jury selection, is discussed.
Date unknown • Court (implied)
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Judge Pauley attempted to determine 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer.
2011-12-20 • Court
The writing of a legal brief by Edelstein and Ms. Brune.
Date unknown
Redirect examination of Ms. Brune by Mr. Davis, during which Government Exhibit 28 (a letter from Ms. Brune) is admitted into evidence.
Date unknown • The Court
A discussion between Edelstein and Ms. Brune about what information to include or omit in a legal brief concerning Catherine Conrad.
Date unknown
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event