DOJ-OGR-00002237(1).jpg
756 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing (court order/memorandum regarding bail)
File Size:
756 KB
Summary
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 106) from December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It details the Defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million package co-signed by her spouse, friends, and family, secured by property and cash. The proposal includes home confinement with GPS monitoring, private security paid for by the defendant, and a family member acting as a third-party custodian.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
Subject of the bail motion (Ghislaine Maxwell, based on case number 1:20-cr-00330)
|
| Spouse | Co-signer |
Co-signed the $22.5 million personal recognizance bond
|
| Friends and family members | Co-signers |
Five individuals co-signed additional bonds
|
| Family member | Proposed Third-party Custodian |
Would take custody of the Defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i)
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States District Court |
Southern District of New York (S.D.N.Y.) implied by case citations and location restrictions
|
|
| Security Company |
Unnamed company proposing to provide security services and post the sixth bond
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (referenced in footer stamp DOJ-OGR)
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Proposed travel restriction zone
|
|
|
Proposed travel restriction zone
|
|
|
Proposed location of detention
|
Relationships (3)
Spouse co-signed $22.5 million bond with Defendant
Security company would provide services and post the sixth bond
Family member proposed as third-party custodian
Key Quotes (3)
"The newly proposed conditions include a $28.5 million bail package, which consists of a $22.5 million personal recognizance bond co-signed by the Defendant and her spouse"Source
DOJ-OGR-00002237(1).jpg
Quote #1
"Defendant proposes a more expansive set of bail conditions that she claims addresses any concerns regarding risk of flight."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002237(1).jpg
Quote #2
"no conditions could reasonably assure her appearance and that pretrial detention was warranted."Source
DOJ-OGR-00002237(1).jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,206 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 106 Filed 12/30/20 Page 5 of 22
hearing and that has a material bearing on the issue whether there are conditions of release that
will reasonably assure the appearance of such person as required and the safety of any other
person and the community.” A court may also revisit its own decision pursuant to its inherent
authority, even where the circumstances do not match § 3142(f)’s statutory text. See, e.g.,
United States v. Rowe, No. 02-CR-756 (LMM), 2003 WL 21196846, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 21,
2003) (noting that “a release order may be reconsidered even where the evidence proffered on
reconsideration was known to the movant at the time of the original hearing.”); United States v.
Petrov, No. 15-CR-66 (LTS), 2015 WL 11022886, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2015) (noting the
“Court’s inherent authority for reconsideration of the Court’s previous bail decision”).
will reasonably assure the appearance of such person as required and the safety of any other
person and the community.” A court may also revisit its own decision pursuant to its inherent
authority, even where the circumstances do not match § 3142(f)’s statutory text. See, e.g.,
United States v. Rowe, No. 02-CR-756 (LMM), 2003 WL 21196846, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 21,
2003) (noting that “a release order may be reconsidered even where the evidence proffered on
reconsideration was known to the movant at the time of the original hearing.”); United States v.
Petrov, No. 15-CR-66 (LTS), 2015 WL 11022886, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 26, 2015) (noting the
“Court’s inherent authority for reconsideration of the Court’s previous bail decision”).
In line with this, the Defendant’s new motion aims to address the reasons that the Court
provided when it originally determined that no conditions could reasonably assure her
appearance and that pretrial detention was warranted. First, the Defendant proposes a more
expansive set of bail conditions that she claims addresses any concerns regarding risk of flight.
The newly proposed conditions include a $28.5 million bail package, which consists of a $22.5
million personal recognizance bond co-signed by the Defendant and her spouse and secured by
approximately $8 million in property and $500,000 in cash, along with six additional bonds—
five co-signed by the Defendant’s friends and family members and the sixth posted by the
security company that would provide security services to the Defendant if she were granted bail
and transferred to home confinement. See Def. Mot. at 2. The proposed conditions also provide
that the Defendant would be released to the custody of a family member, who would serve as her
third-party custodian under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that she would be placed in home
confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and
Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with
provided when it originally determined that no conditions could reasonably assure her
appearance and that pretrial detention was warranted. First, the Defendant proposes a more
expansive set of bail conditions that she claims addresses any concerns regarding risk of flight.
The newly proposed conditions include a $28.5 million bail package, which consists of a $22.5
million personal recognizance bond co-signed by the Defendant and her spouse and secured by
approximately $8 million in property and $500,000 in cash, along with six additional bonds—
five co-signed by the Defendant’s friends and family members and the sixth posted by the
security company that would provide security services to the Defendant if she were granted bail
and transferred to home confinement. See Def. Mot. at 2. The proposed conditions also provide
that the Defendant would be released to the custody of a family member, who would serve as her
third-party custodian under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that she would be placed in home
confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and
Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with
5
DOJ-OGR-00002237
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document