family member
PersonRelationship Network
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
the defendant
|
Custodial |
6
|
2 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Familial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Legal representative |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Custodial |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
the defendant
|
Familial proposed custodial |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Proposed release from custody | A proposal for the Defendant to be released under conditions including home confinement, GPS moni... | Southern and Eastern Distri... | View |
DOJ-OGR-00001228.jpg
This document is page 19 of a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330, filed Dec 30, 2020) arguing against granting bail to the defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell). The text argues that no conditions, including GPS monitoring or private security, can assure her appearance given her prior sophistication in evading detection. It cites the 'Boustani' precedent to argue against a 'two-tiered bail system' that allows wealthy defendants to create private jails using their own funds.
DOJ-OGR-00001227.jpg
This legal document details a court's reasoning for finding a defendant's proposed bail package insufficient to prevent flight risk. Despite proposals for home confinement, GPS monitoring, and custody by a family member, the court concludes that the defendant's vast unrestrained wealth means the financial package does not meaningfully mitigate the possibility of her fleeing.
DOJ-OGR-00002251(1).jpg
This document is page 19 of a court order filed on December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). The court rejects the Defendant's proposed release conditions, including GPS monitoring, home confinement, and private security, citing her proven sophistication in evading detection and flight risk. The ruling also emphasizes legal precedents (specifically *United States v. Boustani*) that forbid a 'two-tiered bail system' where wealthy defendants can buy their way out of detention via self-funded private security.
DOJ-OGR-00002237(1).jpg
This document is page 5 of a legal filing (Document 106) from December 30, 2020, in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN). It details the Defendant's new motion for bail, proposing a $28.5 million package co-signed by her spouse, friends, and family, secured by property and cash. The proposal includes home confinement with GPS monitoring, private security paid for by the defendant, and a family member acting as a third-party custodian.
DOJ-OGR-00020145.jpg
This legal document is a court filing that analyzes a defendant's proposed bail package. The Court concludes that the package, including a partially secured bond and various release conditions like home confinement, does not sufficiently mitigate the risk of flight. The Court reasons that the defendant's vast unrestrained wealth would plausibly allow her to flee and compensate third parties who supported her bond, and her arguments about illiquid assets are unpersuasive.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity