DOJ-OGR-00020145.jpg
512 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
512 KB
Summary
This legal document is a court filing that analyzes a defendant's proposed bail package. The Court concludes that the package, including a partially secured bond and various release conditions like home confinement, does not sufficiently mitigate the risk of flight. The Court reasons that the defendant's vast unrestrained wealth would plausibly allow her to flee and compensate third parties who supported her bond, and her arguments about illiquid assets are unpersuasive.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant |
The subject of the legal document, whose proposed bail package and release conditions are being discussed.
|
| family member | Proposed third-party custodian |
Mentioned as the individual who would serve as the Defendant's custodian if she were released.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the Court | government agency |
The judicial body making the decision on the Defendant's bail package.
|
| Pretrial Services | government agency |
The agency that would supervise the Defendant under the proposed release conditions.
|
Timeline (1 events)
A proposal for the Defendant to be released under conditions including home confinement, GPS monitoring, travel restrictions, and supervision by a third-party custodian and Pretrial Services.
Southern and Eastern Districts of New York
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The geographical area to which the Defendant's travel would be restricted under the proposed bail conditions.
|
Relationships (1)
The proposed conditions also provide that the Defendant would be released to the custody of a family member, who would serve as the Defendant’s third-party custodian...
Key Quotes (2)
"significant loans on the basis of a negative pledge"Source
— The Defendant
(Part of an argument made by the Defendant to demonstrate financial ties that would prevent flight.)
DOJ-OGR-00020145.jpg
Quote #1
"illiquid hedge fund that could only be liquidated with considerable difficulty"Source
— The Defendant
(Part of an argument made by the Defendant to show her assets are not easily accessible to fund a flight from justice.)
DOJ-OGR-00020145.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,110 characters)
Case 20-cr-560-AJN Document 1062 Filed 06/30/21 Page 18 of 22
millions of dollars and other assets that she could sell in order to support herself. See Gov’t Opp’n at 23. Furthermore, the proposed bond is only partially secured. Taking into account the vast amounts of wealth left relatively unrestrained by the bail package, that amount, standing alone, cannot reasonably assure that she would appear before the Court. Nor is the Court’s conclusion altered by the fact that a number of third parties have pledged to support her bond; the amount of wealth that she would retain were she to flee, in addition to contingent assets and future income streams that are not accounted for in the bail package, would plausibly enable her to compensate them, in part or in full, for their losses. And while the Defendant argues that she has procured “significant loans on the basis of a negative pledge” over a property and that $4 million is invested in an “illiquid hedge fund that could only be liquidated with considerable difficulty,” see Def. Reply at 6, these arguments do not alter the Court’s ultimate conclusion that the financial package does not meaningfully mitigate the possibility of flight.
The proposed conditions also provide that the Defendant would be released to the custody of a family member, who would serve as the Defendant’s third-party custodian under 18 U.S.C. § 3142(c)(1)(B)(i); that the Defendant would be placed in home confinement with GPS monitoring and that her travel would be restricted to the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York and would be limited to appearances in Court, meetings with counsel, medical visits, and upon approval by the Court or Pretrial Services; that she would be under the strict supervision of Pretrial Services; and that she would surrender all travel documents. Id. at 2–3. Furthermore, the Defendant would have on-premises security guards who would prevent her from leaving the residence at any time without prior approval by the Court or Pretrial Services and who would escort her when she is authorized to leave. Id. at 3.
18
DOJ-OGR-00020145
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document