Extraction Summary

20
People
11
Organizations
10
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court filing - motion for leave to file under seal
File Size: 50.1 KB
Summary

This document is a Motion for Leave to File Under Seal submitted on May 29, 2009, by attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and 102 in the Southern District of Florida. The plaintiffs request permission to file their response to Epstein's Motion to Stay under seal, or alternatively, request the court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) so they can adequately respond. The document includes a comprehensive service list detailing attorneys representing Epstein, co-defendant Sarah Kellen (represented by Bruce Reinhart), and various other Jane Doe plaintiffs.

People (20)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Defendant
Defendant in multiple civil cases listed in the document
Jane Doe No. 101 Plaintiff
Plaintiff filing motion to seal response or unseal NPA
Jane Doe No. 102 Plaintiff
Plaintiff filing motion to seal response or unseal NPA
Sarah Kellen Co-Defendant
Represented by Bruce E. Reinhart
Katherine W. Ezell Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (Podhurst Orseck)
Robert C. Josefsberg Attorney
Attorney for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (Podhurst Orseck)
Robert Critton Attorney
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Michael J. Pike Attorney
Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Jack Goldberger Attorney
Co-Counsel for Defendant Jeffrey Epstein
Bruce E. Reinhart Attorney
Counsel for Co-Defendant Sarah Kellen
Jack Scarola Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
Jack P. Hill Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
Adam Horowitz Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
Stuart Mermelstein Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Cases
Spencer Todd Kuvin Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
Theodore Jon Leopold Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
Richard Willits Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811
Brad Edwards Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893
Isidro Manuel Garcia Attorney
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469
C.M.A. Plaintiff
Plaintiff in related case 08-CV-80811

Timeline (2 events)

2008-08-21
Order to Compel Production and Protective Order entered
Southern District of Florida
2009-05-29
Filing of Motion for Leave to File Under Seal
United States District Court Southern District of Florida

Relationships (5)

Jeffrey Epstein Legal Adversary Jane Doe No. 101
Plaintiff vs Defendant in case 09-CV-80591
Jeffrey Epstein Legal Adversary Jane Doe No. 102
Plaintiff vs Defendant in case 09-CV-80656
Sarah Kellen Attorney-Client Bruce E. Reinhart
Service list lists Bruce E. Reinhart as 'Counsel for Co-Defendant, Sarah Kellen'
Jeffrey Epstein Attorney-Client Robert Critton
Service list lists Robert Critton as 'Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein'
Jeffrey Epstein Attorney-Client Jack Goldberger
Service list lists Jack Goldberger as 'Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein'

Key Quotes (4)

"The Protective Order prohibits Plaintiffs from disclosing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (the 'NPA') or its terms to any third party."
Source
027.pdf
Quote #1
"Undersigned counsel seek to file this Response in Opposition to Defendant Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion to Stay under seal in order to abide by this Court’s August 21, 2008 Order"
Source
027.pdf
Quote #2
"In the alternative, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to unseal the Non-Prosecution Agreement in order to allow Plaintiffs to concretely respond to Defendant’s Motion to Stay."
Source
027.pdf
Quote #3
"Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 would then have 'a specific tangible need to be relieved of the restrictions' of the Protective Order because consideration of the terms of the NPA is necessary for this Court to resolve Defendant’s Motion to Stay."
Source
027.pdf
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (9,706 characters)

5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
JANE DOE NO. 2, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80119-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE NO. 3, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80232-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE NO. 4, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80380-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 1 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
JANE DOE NO. 5, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80381-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE NO. 6, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80994-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE NO. 7, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80993-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
C.M.A., CASE NO.: 08-CV-80811-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 2 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80893-MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE NO. II, CASE NO.: 08-CV-80469-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
JANE DOE NO. 101, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80591-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 3 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
JANE DOE NO. 102, CASE NO.: 09-CV-80656-
MARRA/JOHNSON
Plaintiff,
vs.
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Defendant.
____________________________________/
PLAINTIFFS JANE DOE NO. 101 AND JANE DOE NO. 102’s MOTION FOR
LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO
DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STAY OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, TO UNSEAL
THE NONPROSECUTION AGREEMENT
Pursuant to Rule 5.4 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida, Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 (together,
the “Plaintiffs”) by and through their undersigned attorneys, hereby file this Motion For
Leave to File Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102’s Response in
Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time Certain
Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated Memorandum of
Law Under Seal, and, as grounds, state as follows:
1. Undersigned counsel seek to file this Response in Opposition to Defendant
Jeffrey Epstein’s Motion to Stay under seal in order to abide by this Court’s August 21,
2008 Order to Compel Production and Protective Order entered in Case No. 08-80736-
CIV-MARRA/JOHNSON (the “Protective Order”). The Protective Order prohibits
Plaintiffs from disclosing the Non-Prosecution Agreement (the “NPA”) or its terms to
any third party. The sealed document should be maintained under seal for the duration
of this Court’s August 21, 2008 Protective Order.
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 4 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
2. Undersigned counsel recognize that this Court has previously unsealed
documents referring to the NPA. We seek to comply with the Protective Order for this
new and independent filing in an abundance of caution, until directed otherwise by the
Court.
3. If this Court denies Plaintiffs’ instant motion, Plaintiffs seek appropriate
disclosure of the NPA pursuant to this Court’s recent order in Case No. 08-80736-CIV MARRA/JOHNSON (DE #36) denying Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 1 and Jane Doe No. 2’s
motion to unseal the NPA. As stated in that Order, the NPA has not been filed with the
Court. Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 would then have “a specific
tangible need to be relieved of the restrictions” of the Protective Order because
consideration of the terms of the NPA is necessary for this Court to resolve Defendant’s
Motion to Stay.
WHEREFORE,
1. Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to enter an Order granting
Plaintiffs Jane Doe No. 101 and Jane Doe No. 102 the right to file under seal their
Response in Opposition to Defendant’s Motion to Stay and/or Continue Action for Time
Certain Based on Parallel Civil and Criminal Proceedings With Incorporated
Memorandum of Law.
2. In the alternative, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to unseal the
Non-Prosecution Agreement in order to allow Plaintiffs to concretely respond to
Defendant’s Motion to Stay.
3. Finally, Plaintiffs respectfully request this Court to grant such other and
further relief to which this Court finds the Plaintiff otherwise entitled.
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 5 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
Date: May 29, 2009
Respectfully submitted,

PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No.
101 and Jane Doe No. 102
By: s/Katherine W. Ezell
Robert C. Josefsberg
Fla. Bar No. 040856
rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
Katherine W. Ezell
Fla. Bar No. 114771
kezell@podhurst.com
City National Bank Building
25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
Telephone: (305) 358-2800
Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH LOCAL RULE 7.1.A.3
On May 29, 2009, undersigned counsel conferred with counsel for Defendant in a
good faith effort to resolve the issues raised in this motion, and Defendant’s counsel
advised that Defendant opposes this motion.
Date: May 29, 2009
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 6 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
WE HEREBY CERTIFY that, on this 29th day of May, 2009, we electronically
filed the foregoing document with the Clerk of the Court using CM/ECF. We also certify
that the foregoing document is being served this day on all counsel of record identified on
the attached Service List either via transmission of Notices of Electronic Filing generated
by CM/ECF or in some other authorized manner for those counsel or parties who are not
authorized to receive electronically Notices of Electronic Filing.
Respectfully submitted,
PODHURST ORSECK, P.A.
Attorneys for Plaintiffs Jane Doe No.
101 and Jane Doe No. 102

By: s/Katherine W. Ezell
Robert C. Josefsberg
Fla. Bar No. 040856
rjosefsberg@podhurst.com
Katherine W. Ezell
Fla. Bar No. 114771
kezell@podhurst.com
City National Bank Building
25 W. Flagler Street, Suite 800
Miami, FL 33130
Telephone: (305) 358-2800
Facsimile: (305) 358-2382
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 7 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
SERVICE LIST
JANE DOE NO. 2 v. JEFFREY EPSTEIN
Case No. 08-CV-80119-MARRA/JOHNSON
United States District Court, Southern District of Florida
Robert Critton, Esq.
Michael J. Pike, Esq.
Burman, Critton, Luttier & Coleman LLP
515 North Flagler Drive, Suite 400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561) 842-2820
Fax: (561) 515-3148
rcrit@bclclaw.com
mpike@bclclaw.com
Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein

Jack Goldberger, Esq.
Atterbury, Goldberger & Weiss, P.A.
250 Australian Avenue South, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561) 659-8300
Fax: (561) 835-8691
jagesq@bellsouth.net
Co-Counsel for Defendant, Jeffrey Epstein
Bruce E. Reinhart, Esq.
Bruce E. Reinhart, P.A.
250 South Australian Avenue, Suite 1400
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561) 202-6360
Fax: (561) 828-0983
ecf@brucereinhartlaw.com
Counsel for Co-Defendant, Sarah Kellen
Jack Scarola, Esq.
Jack P. Hill, Esq.
Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley, P.A.
2139 Palm Beach Lakes Boulevard
West Palm Beach, Florida 33409
Phone: (561) 686-6300
Fax: (561) 383-9456
jsx@searcylaw.com
jph@searcylaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff C.M.A.
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 8 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
Adam Horowitz, Esq.
Stuart Mermelstein, Esq.
Mermelstein & Horowitz, P.A.
18205 Biscayne Blvd., Suite 2218
Miami, FL 33160
Phone: (305) 931-2200
Fax: (305) 931-0877
ahorowitz@sexabuseattorney.com
smermelstein@sexabuseattorney.com
Counsel for Plaintiffs in Related Case Nos. 08-80069, 08-80119,08-80232, 08-80380, 08-
80381, 08-80993, 08-80994
Spencer Todd Kuvin, Esq.
Theodore Jon Leopold, Esq.
Leopold Kuvin, P.A.
2925 PGA Boulevard, Suite 200
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
Phone: (561) 515-1400
Fax: (561) 515-1401
skuvin@leopoldkuvin.com
tleopold@leopoldkuvin.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-08804
Richard Willits, Esq.
Richard H. Willits, P.A.
2290 10th Ave North, Suite 404
Lake Worth, FL 33461
Phone: (561) 582-7600
Fax: (561) 588-8819
lawyerwillits@aol.com
reelrhw@hotmail.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80811
Brad Edwards, Esq.
Law Office of Brad Edwards & Associates, LLC
2028 Harrison Street, Suite 202
Hollywood, FL 33020
Phone: (954) 414-8033
Fax: (954) 924-1530
bedwards@rra-law.com
be@bradedwardslaw.com
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80893

Isidro Manuel Garcia, Esq.
Garcia Elkins & Boehringer
Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 9 of 10
5/29/2009
4:41:55 PM
224 Datura Avenue, Suite 900
West Palm Beach, FL 33401
Phone: (561) 832-8033
Fax: (561) 832-7137
isidrogarcia@bellsouth.net
Counsel for Plaintiff in Related Case No. 08-80469

Case 9:09-cv-80469-KAM Document 27 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/29/2009 Page 10 of 10

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document