EFTA00009877.pdf
59.1 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain / legal correspondence
File Size:
59.1 KB
Summary
An email chain between legal professionals discussing ongoing litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The correspondence references a meeting held on February 29, 2016, where documents including a defamation complaint against Maxwell, CVRA case filings, and a 'redacted 302' (FBI interview) were shared. A later email in the chain from March 8, 2016, highlights a NY Post article about Epstein's continued relationships with young women.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject |
Subject of a NY Post article regarding relationships with young women.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Defendant in a defamation case; motion to dismiss was denied.
|
| Judge Sweet | Judge |
Judge who denied Ghislaine Maxwell's motion to dismiss.
|
| Redacted Attorney | Lead Attorney |
Described as one of the lead attorneys on the case who knows the facts very well.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Post / Page Six |
News outlet reporting on Epstein.
|
|
| FBI |
Implied by the mention of a 'redacted 302' (standard FBI interview form).
|
Timeline (2 events)
2016-03-08
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the URL regarding Epstein's property housing women.
|
Relationships (1)
Discussed in context of related legal cases (CVRA and defamation) in the same email thread.
Key Quotes (3)
"If you haven’t already seen it, the Post reported today on Jeffrey Epstein’s continued relationships with young women."Source
EFTA00009877.pdf
Quote #1
"Complaint in the defamation case against Ghislaine Maxwell (just today, Judge Sweet denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss today)"Source
EFTA00009877.pdf
Quote #2
"The redacted 302"Source
EFTA00009877.pdf
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,304 characters)
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Subject: FW: [Redacted]
Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 4:01:53 PM
To: [Redacted]
Subject: FW: [Redacted]
Date: Friday, November 30, 2018 4:01:53 PM
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 12:28 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, March 8, 2016 12:28 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: [Redacted]
[Redacted] -
If you haven’t already seen it, the Post reported today on Jeffrey Epstein’s continued relationships with young women.
http://pagesix.com/2016/03/08/jeffrey-epsteins-east-side-mansion-houses-russian-playmates/
Best,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:13 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: [Redacted]
Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:13 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: [Redacted]
[Redacted]
I am adding [Redacted] to this email chain as well. As we mentioned earlier today, [Redacted] is one of the lead attorneys on the case and knows both [Redacted] and the facts very well. Please include [Redacted] in any follow-up that you may.
Best,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:03 PM
To: [Redacted]
Date: Monday, February 29, 2016 at 10:03 PM
To: [Redacted]
EFTA00009877
[Page 2]
Subject: [Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Thank you again for meeting with us today. We very much appreciate your time. I am attaching the following documents for your review:
1. Complaint in the defamation case against Ghislaine Maxwell (just today, Judge Sweet denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss today);
2. Declarations that [Redacted] filed in the CVRA case;
3. The Rule 56.1 statement recently filed in the CVRA case;
4. The redacted 302
2. Declarations that [Redacted] filed in the CVRA case;
3. The Rule 56.1 statement recently filed in the CVRA case;
4. The redacted 302
Please let us know what other information we can provide or if you have any further questions.
Best,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
The information contained in this electronic message is confidential information intended only for the use of the named recipient(s) and may contain information that, among other protections, is the subject of attorney-client privilege, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this electronic message is not the named recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the named recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or other use of this communication is strictly prohibited and no privilege is waived. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by replying to this electronic message and then deleting this electronic message from your computer. [v.1]
EFTA00009878
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document