DOJ-OGR-00015149.jpg

886 KB

Extraction Summary

10
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 886 KB
Summary

This legal document describes the process of two separate grand jury proceedings related to indictments against an individual named Maxwell. It details that on June 29, 2020, and March 29, 2021, grand juries heard testimony from an FBI agent and an NYPD detective, respectively, who presented hearsay evidence summarizing the government's investigation. The document outlines the exhibits presented and the subsequent indictments returned by the juries.

People (10)

Name Role Context
law enforcement agent Summary Witness
Testified before a grand jury, summarizing the government's investigation.
Assistant United States Attorney Attorney
Questioned the law enforcement agent during grand jury testimony.
victims Victim
Mentioned as individuals whose statements were recounted as hearsay by the testifying agent.
select witnesses Witness
Mentioned as individuals whose statements were recounted as hearsay by the testifying agent.
Garcia
Party in the legal case United States v. Garcia, cited as precedent.
Ruggiero
Party in the legal case United States v. Ruggiero, cited as precedent.
Dukagjini
Party in the legal case United States v. Dukagjini, cited as precedent.
FBI special agent Special Agent
Testified before the first Maxwell grand jury on June 29, 2020.
Maxwell Defendant
The subject of the proposed indictments presented to the grand juries.
New York Police Department detective Detective
Testified before the second Maxwell grand jury on March 29, 2021.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Government government agency
Conducted the investigation that was presented to the grand jury.
FBI government agency
An FBI special agent testified before the first Maxwell grand jury.
New York Police Department government agency
A detective from this department testified before the second Maxwell grand jury.

Timeline (3 events)

2020-06-29
The first Maxwell grand jury met and heard testimony from an FBI special agent for approximately one hour and 25 minutes.
first Maxwell grand jury FBI special agent
2020-07-08
The first Maxwell grand jury met briefly to return the "S1" superseding indictment, which corrected two typographical errors.
first Maxwell grand jury
2021-03-29
The second Maxwell grand jury met and heard testimony from a New York Police Department detective for approximately one hour and 48 minutes.
second Maxwell grand jury New York Police Department detective

Locations (1)

Location Context
Mentioned as part of the New York Police Department.

Relationships (2)

The Assistant United States Attorney conducted the questioning of the law enforcement agent during the grand jury testimony.
Maxwell adversarial Government
The Government is seeking indictments against Maxwell, presenting evidence to grand juries for this purpose.

Key Quotes (2)

"[i]t is entirely permissible for the government to use hearsay evidence in its presentation to the grand jury."
Source
— United States v. Garcia (A quote from a legal precedent cited in footnote 14 to justify the use of hearsay in the grand jury proceedings.)
DOJ-OGR-00015149.jpg
Quote #1
"grand jury practice, improper at trial, of a single agent simply summarizing an investigation by others"
Source
— United States v. Dukagjini (A note from a legal precedent cited in footnote 14 describing the common practice of using a summary witness in grand jury proceedings.)
DOJ-OGR-00015149.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,717 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 809 Filed 08/11/25 Page 17 of 31
Each grand jury received evidence on a single day. On that day, it heard testimony from one person: a law enforcement agent who, acting as a summary witness, testified to information obtained in the Government’s investigation to support the charges in the proposed indictment.
The agent, responding to tightly structured questions from an Assistant United States Attorney (“AUSA”), provided highly abbreviated, hearsay accounts of the statements of select witnesses (e.g., the victims on whom counts in the proposed indictment were based).14 The agent led the jury through a PowerPoint of exhibits (e.g., photographs and business records). At the end of the testimony, the agent testified that he or she had not disclosed all that he or she knew, but had only responded to the AUSA’s questions. Afterwards, each grand jury voted to return the proposed indictment.15
---
14 Under federal law, “[i]t is entirely permissible for the government to use hearsay evidence in its presentation to the grand jury.” United States v. Garcia, 413 F.3d 201, 213 (2d Cir. 2005) (quoting United States v. Ruggiero, 934 F.2d 440, 447 (2d Cir. 1991)); see also United States v. Dukagjini, 326 F.3d 45, 54 (2d Cir. 2003) (noting the common “grand jury practice, improper at trial, of a single agent simply summarizing an investigation by others”).
15 The first Maxwell grand jury met on June 29, 2020. It heard testimony from an FBI special agent. The agent’s testimony lasted approximately one hour and 25 minutes, spanning 74 double-spaced transcript pages. Two exhibits were put before the grand jury: a PowerPoint containing slides referred to during the agent’s testimony; and the proposed indictment of Maxwell. The same grand jury briefly met again on July 8, 2020, for the purpose of returning the “S1” superseding indictment, which corrected two typographical errors in the indictment. Compare Dkt. 17, with Dkt. 1. The grand jury did not receive additional evidence.
The second Maxwell grand jury met on March 29, 2021. It heard testimony from a New York Police Department detective. The detective’s testimony lasted approximately an hour and 48 minutes, not including a brief recess, and spanned 117 double-spaced transcript pages. Nearly two-thirds of the testimony consisted of reading into the record the special agent’s June 29, 2020 testimony. Six exhibits were put before the grand jury: the transcript of the June 29, 2020 grand jury testimony; the PowerPoint put before the June 29, 2020 grand jury; a new PowerPoint with further exhibits; the two earlier indictments of Maxwell; and the proposed “S2” superseding indictment.
17
DOJ-OGR-00015149

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document