Garcia
PersonRelationship Network
EFTA00034860.pdf
This document is a Daily Activity Report from the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York dated July 9, 2019, covering activities from the previous day, July 8, 2019. It notes a significant staff shortage resulting in the vacation of correctional assignment '10-South #2' during both day and evening shifts, and reports that the fire suppression system was inoperative. Crucially, it records that inmate Jeffrey Epstein (#76318-054) was placed on 'Psych Obs' (Psychological Observation) during the Evening Watch shift.
EFTA00025264.pdf
Handwritten interview notes from an inmate witness housed in the MCC Special Housing Unit (SHU) describing the conditions and the specific night of Jeffrey Epstein's first suicide attempt (likely July 23, 2019). The witness, located in Cell 119, describes hearing a thump, the cellmate (former police officer Nicholas Tartaglione) screaming for guards, and the chaotic response where guards allegedly dropped Epstein from a stretcher twice. The notes detail the items used for the attempt (orange socks and towel tied together), the lack of regular checks, and the video recording of the aftermath.
EFTA00017757.pdf
This document contains a roster of inmates and their corresponding registration numbers for various housing tiers (L, G, H, J, K, M). Jeffrey Epstein (Inmate 76318-054) is listed as being housed in L-Tier. The document serves as a snapshot of inmate housing assignments, likely within the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) New York.
DOJ-OGR-00021053.jpg
This document is a 'Table of Authorities' page from a legal filing dated February 28, 2023. It lists various legal precedents (case law) cited in the main brief, including 'Doe v. Indyke et al.,' which directly references Darren Indyke, a known associate and executor for Jeffrey Epstein. The document bears a Department of Justice Bates stamp.
DOJ-OGR-00015149.jpg
This legal document describes the process of two separate grand jury proceedings related to indictments against an individual named Maxwell. It details that on June 29, 2020, and March 29, 2021, grand juries heard testimony from an FBI agent and an NYPD detective, respectively, who presented hearsay evidence summarizing the government's investigation. The document outlines the exhibits presented and the subsequent indictments returned by the juries.
DOJ-OGR-00021119.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing, likely a court opinion or brief, dated February 28, 2023. The author argues against the retroactive application of a statute (ยง 3283) by analyzing legislative intent, referencing Senator Leahy's remarks and Congress's rejection of a specific retroactivity provision in a 2003 bill. The argument is supported by comparing the rejected language to similar provisions in other statutes (Pub.L. 107-56 and Pub.L. 101-647) to conclude that applying the statute retroactively fails the legal test established in the Landgraf case.
DOJ-OGR-00009146.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against a finding of implied bias for 'Juror 50'. It outlines the Second Circuit's established 'narrow' view on the matter, citing multiple precedents where the court refused to presume bias based on occupational relationships or personal experiences without a showing of actual prejudice. The document asserts that the current circumstances involving Juror 50 do not meet the high threshold for mandatory disqualification set by the Second Circuit.
DOJ-OGR-00009825.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, argues against excusing 'Juror 50' for implied bias. It heavily cites Second Circuit precedent, which maintains a 'narrow' view on the matter, requiring more than just similar personal experiences or occupational relationships to presume bias. The document asserts that the circumstances of Juror 50 do not meet the high threshold for mandatory disqualification established by the court.
DOJ-OGR-00005642.jpg
This document is page 18 of a legal filing (Document 386) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on October 29, 2021. It argues against the admissibility of testimony from an expert witness named Rocchio, specifically challenging her opinions on victim credibility and long-term psychological consequences of abuse as irrelevant, prejudicial, and violating Federal Rules of Evidence 401, 402, 403, and 704.
DOJ-OGR-00005749.jpg
This document is a Table of Authorities from a legal filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on October 29, 2021. It lists legal precedents, including numerous 'United States v.' cases from various circuit courts, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, Federal Rules of Evidence, and amendments to the U.S. Constitution. The table indicates the page numbers within the parent document where each authority is cited.
DOJ-OGR-00005753.jpg
This legal document, page 7 of a filing in case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE dated October 29, 2021, argues against the admissibility of certain types of expert opinion testimony from law enforcement officers. Citing numerous legal precedents, the document contends that testimony regarding alleged conspiracies, coded communications, witness credibility, and a defendant's mental state (specifically mentioning Ms. Maxwell) constitutes improper expert opinion. The argument concludes that such testimony is particularly prejudicial because juries may give undue weight to evidence presented by government agents.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity