EFTA00028041.pdf
84.5 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
84.5 KB
Summary
An email chain from September 2020 discussing the technical setup of a Relativity database for the 'US v. Epstein' case. The correspondence details requests for specific document review tags (including 'Potential Brady' and 'Work Product'), the renaming of a folder containing FBI files from Florida, and the assignment of document batches to reviewers.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Senders/Recipients | Legal/Review Team and Technical Support |
Participants discussing the setup of the Relativity database for document review in US v. Epstein case.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Relativity |
Software platform used for document database and review
|
|
| FBI |
Mentioned in folder title 'FBI Files from Florida Office'
|
|
| US Government |
Implied by case name 'US v. Epstein'
|
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in file folder names regarding investigation files
|
Relationships (1)
Review Team Member
→
Professional/Service
→
Technical Support
One party requests database modifications (tags, folders) and the other implements them.
Key Quotes (5)
"When you rename this folder, could you please also break the folder into review batches of 500-documents each"Source
EFTA00028041.pdf
Quote #1
"rename the folder entitled 'Florida Investigation FOIA Files_2' to 'FBI Files from Florida Office'"Source
EFTA00028041.pdf
Quote #2
"We would like to use several tags as we conduct our review of documents in the 'US v Epstein' database on Relativity."Source
EFTA00028041.pdf
Quote #3
"Potential Brady"Source
EFTA00028041.pdf
Quote #4
"Work Product (Do Not Produce)"Source
EFTA00028041.pdf
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,422 characters)
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:44:47 +0000
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:44:47 +0000
Hi [Redacted],
Thanks for all of your help. Can you please (1) remove the responsiveness review field; and (2) create the following additional tags:
• 3600
• [Redacted]
• [Redacted]
• [Redacted]
• [Redacted]
Please let us know if you have any questions.
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 9:23 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Sent: Tuesday, September 22, 2020 9:23 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Hi [Redacted],
When you rename this folder, could you please also break the folder into review batches of 500-documents each, and assign a third to me, a third to [Redacted], and a third to [Redacted]?
Thanks very much,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 6:00 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 6:00 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Hi [Redacted],
Thanks very much for the quick response. We would like all tags in one field with check boxes, please. We want to be able to tag each document with multiple tags if appropriate.
Also, in the same “US v Epstein” database, would it be possible to please rename the folder entitled “Florida Investigation FOIA Files_2” to “FBI Files from Florida Office”? The new title will help us understand what is actually in that folder.
Thanks very much,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 8:46 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 8:46 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: RE: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Good Morning,
Do you want all of these tags in one field on in several fields? Also do you want these tags in both of the Epstein Relativity databases?
Thank you.
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2020 6:04 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Sent: Sunday, September 20, 2020 6:04 PM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: Tags for US v. Epstein Relativity Database
Hi [Redacted],
We would like to use several tags as we conduct our review of documents in the “US v Epstein” database on Relativity. For that database, would you please help us create the below tags?
• Reviewed
• Witness Statement
• Produce As Is
• Produce With Redactions
• Produce As Confidential
• Produce As Highly Confidential
• Work Product (Do Not Produce)
• Potential Brady
• Hot Doc
• For Further Review
• Tech Issue
• Witness Statement
• Produce As Is
• Produce With Redactions
• Produce As Confidential
• Produce As Highly Confidential
• Work Product (Do Not Produce)
• Potential Brady
• Hot Doc
• For Further Review
• Tech Issue
Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to discuss.
Thanks very much,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00028041
EFTA00028042
EFTA00028043
EFTA00028042
EFTA00028043
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document