DOJ-OGR-00002360(3).jpg
601 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
601 KB
Summary
This legal document page, filed on February 4, 2021, argues that the government was aware of information beyond public filings when it began its investigation. It cites a February 29, 2016 meeting where attorneys from Boies Schiller urged AUSA Amanda Kramer to investigate Epstein and Maxwell, and a later approach in summer 2016 by David Boies himself asking the government to consider perjury charges against Maxwell. The document includes a quote from Boies stating they had evidence of a "massive sex trafficking ring."
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Amanda Kramer | AUSA |
Met with attorneys from Boies Schiller on February 29, 2016, who urged her to open an investigation of Epstein and Ma...
|
| Epstein |
Subject of a potential investigation that AUSA Amanda Kramer was urged to open.
|
|
| Maxwell |
Subject of a potential investigation and potential perjury charges. Mentioned as having two depositions.
|
|
| David Boies |
Approached the government in the summer of 2016 to ask about charging Maxwell with perjury. Quoted about having evide...
|
|
| Mr. Boies |
Alias for David Boies, quoted in the document.
|
|
| Stephen Rex Brown | Author |
Author of a New York Daily News article cited in a footnote.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein |
Mentioned in the footnote as the subject of a case that prosecutors declined to pursue in 2016.
|
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell |
Mentioned in the footnote as the subject of a case that prosecutors declined to pursue in 2016.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Boies Schiller | Law firm |
Attorneys from this firm met with AUSA Amanda Kramer to urge an investigation into Epstein and Maxwell.
|
| Southern District | Government agency |
David Boies asked if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
|
| New York Daily News | Media company |
Publication cited in a footnote, which published an article by Stephen Rex Brown on October 13, 2020.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2016
David Boies approached the government asking if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.
David Boies
the government
2016
Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue the Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell case.
Manhattan
Manhattan federal prosecutors
2016-02-29
AUSA Amanda Kramer met with attorneys from Boies Schiller, who urged her to open an investigation of Epstein and Maxwell.
Amanda Kramer
attorneys from Boies Schiller
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the footnote in the phrase "Manhattan federal prosecutors".
|
Relationships (3)
David Boies approached the government to ask about charging Maxwell with perjury and stated he had evidence of a massive sex trafficking ring involving her.
Attorneys from David Boies's firm (Boies Schiller) met with AUSA Amanda Kramer to discuss opening an investigation.
Key Quotes (3)
"urged Kramer to open an investigation of"Source
— attorneys from Boies Schiller
(Describing the purpose of the February 29, 2016 meeting with AUSA Amanda Kramer regarding Epstein and Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00002360(3).jpg
Quote #1
"if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury."Source
— David Boies
(The question David Boies posed to the government in the summer of 2016 after Maxwell's depositions.)
DOJ-OGR-00002360(3).jpg
Quote #2
"We were saying to anyone who would listen: We’ve got clients who were abused. Some of them were underage. We have the evidence. There’s a whole record that’s been developed. We can establish beyond any reasonable doubt there was a massive sex trafficking ring going on."Source
— Mr. Boies
(A quote from David Boies explaining his efforts to bring attention to the case.)
DOJ-OGR-00002360(3).jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,414 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 134 Filed 02/04/21 Page 13 of 23
[REDACTED TEXT]
Ex. E, 99 pp 2–3.
Those representations were false. At the time the government claims it began the
investigation ([REDACTED TEXT]), its knowledge of the civil case was not
based exclusively on public filings. It knew that [REDACTED TEXT] possessed relevant information
because [REDACTED TEXT] had come to the government asking it to open an investigation. In particular, on
February 29, 2016, AUSA Amanda Kramer met with attorneys from Boies Schiller, who “urged
Kramer to open an investigation of” Epstein and Maxwell.4 Then, after Maxwell’s two
depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016,
asking “if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.” Brown, supra
n.2. Said Mr. Boies:
investigation ([REDACTED TEXT]), its knowledge of the civil case was not
based exclusively on public filings. It knew that [REDACTED TEXT] possessed relevant information
because [REDACTED TEXT] had come to the government asking it to open an investigation. In particular, on
February 29, 2016, AUSA Amanda Kramer met with attorneys from Boies Schiller, who “urged
Kramer to open an investigation of” Epstein and Maxwell.4 Then, after Maxwell’s two
depositions, David Boies himself apparently approached the government in the summer of 2016,
asking “if the Southern District would consider charging Maxwell with perjury.” Brown, supra
n.2. Said Mr. Boies:
“We were saying to anyone who would listen: We’ve got clients who were abused.
Some of them were underage. We have the evidence. There’s a whole record that’s
been developed. We can establish beyond any reasonable doubt there was a massive
sex trafficking ring going on.”
Some of them were underage. We have the evidence. There’s a whole record that’s
been developed. We can establish beyond any reasonable doubt there was a massive
sex trafficking ring going on.”
Id.
4 Stephen Rex Brown, Manhattan federal prosecutors declined to pursue Jeffrey Epstein and
Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020),
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-
jmzhl7zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-story.html.
Ghislaine Maxwell case in 2016, New York Daily News (Oct. 13, 2020),
https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/ny-jeffrey-epstein-maxwell-case-20201013-
jmzhl7zdrzdgrbbs7yc6bfnszu-story.html.
8
DOJ-OGR-00002360
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document