January 01, 2019
Court-2 did not permit the modification of the civil protective order.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Court-2 | organization | 35 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00019261.jpg
This legal document, part of a court filing, details a procedural history where the Government obtained materials protected by civil orders after receiving permission from one court (Court-1) but not another (Court-2). The Defendant in a related criminal case learned of this through discovery. The current court is now permitting the Defendant to provide this information under seal to the relevant courts to resolve the conflict.
DOJ-OGR-00019561.jpg
This legal document, filed on August 2, 2020, details a procedural history where the U.S. Government, in February 2019, successfully modified a civil protective order in one court (Court-1) to obtain materials for a criminal grand jury investigation. The defendant in the criminal case later learned of this through discovery. The current court is now permitting the defendant to provide information under seal to the relevant courts (Court-1 and Court-2) so they can make their own determinations about the matter.
Events with shared participants
Subsequent to Court-1's ruling, another court, Court-2, did not permit the modification.
2019-01-01 • Court-2
Court-2 denied the Government's application.
Date unknown
Court-1 and Court-2 ordered that filings regarding the Subpoenas remain under seal.
Date unknown
Another court, Court-2, did not permit the modification of the civil protective order.
2019-01-01 • Court-2
Court-1 permitted modification of protective order; Court-2 did not.
2019-01-01 • Unknown Civil Courts
Government applied ex parte and under seal to modify protective orders to permit compliance with subpoenas.
2019-02-01 • Courts
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event