DOJ-OGR-00020547.jpg

1.46 MB

Extraction Summary

5
People
3
Organizations
5
Locations
5
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 1.46 MB
Summary

This legal document, a docket sheet from Case 22-1426 dated July 8, 2022, details several court filings from November 12, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The filings include a memorandum from the USA opposing various defense motions and a reply from Maxwell's team. The document also contains a court order scheduling an in-person proceeding for November 15, 2021, at the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse in New York, specifying the courtroom, overflow rooms for public access, and strict COVID-19 protocols for all attendees.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of multiple motions and a court order regarding an in-person proceeding.
Judge Alison J. Nathan Judge
Signed an order on 11/12/2021.
Accuser-3 Accuser
Mentioned in a 'MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3'.
Rohrbach, Andrew
Name associated with attachments to a Memorandum in Opposition (Document 452).
Pagliuca, Jeffrey
Name associated with attachments to a Reply to Response (Document 453).

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USA government agency
Party filing a 'MEMORANDUM in Opposition' against Ghislaine Maxwell.
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. company
Mentioned in the legal citation 'Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993)'.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York government agency
The court where the proceeding will take place. Referred to as 'S.D.N.Y.' and 'This District'.

Timeline (5 events)

2005-10-20
A search was conducted at 358 El Brillo Way, during which items were purportedly seized.
358 El Brillo Way
2021-09-03
A court order was issued, which is referenced in a motion regarding a failure to comply.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2021-11-12
Filing of a Memorandum in Opposition by the USA and a Reply to Response by Ghislaine Maxwell, both concerning multiple motions in limine.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2021-11-12
Judge Alison J. Nathan signed an order regarding sealing portions of motions and public access.
United States District Court for the Southern District of New York
2021-11-15
An in-person court proceeding is scheduled to be held at 9:30 a.m.
Courtroom 518, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse
Ghislaine Maxwell The Court alleged victims Defendant's family members of the public

Locations (5)

Location Context
Location of a search on October 20, 2005, from which items were purportedly seized.
The specific courthouse where the in-person proceeding is scheduled to occur.
The address of the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse.
The specific courtroom where the proceeding will take place.
Designated overflow rooms for public access to the proceeding.

Relationships (1)

USA professional Ghislaine Maxwell
The document details legal motions filed by the USA in opposition to motions by Ghislaine Maxwell, indicating an adversarial relationship within a court case.

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (4,911 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 3-2, 07/08/2022, 3344434, Page61 of 92
to seal portions of motions in limine, trial exhibits, public access. ENDORSEMENT: The Court received the attached letters via email. This District no longer permits public access by telephone for in-court criminal proceedings, including trials. The memorandum can be found here - https:// nysd.uscourts.gov/covid-19-coronavirus. The Courts public access orders for all proceedings in the case can be found here - https://www.nysd.uscourts.gov/usa-vsghislaine-maxwell-20-cr-330-ajn-caseinformation. The Court has implemented a procedure for docketing filings with proposed redactions and is ruling on the proposals as expeditiously as possible. See Dkt. No. 401. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/12/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 452 MEMORANDUM in Opposition by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell re 449 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Introduction of Government's Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313 and 606., 444 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3., 447 MOTION in Limine to Suppress Identification., 443 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Request for Daubert Hearing., 448 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Law Enforcement Witnesses from Offering Expert Opinion Testimony., 445 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Government Exhibit 52, an Unauthenticated Hearsay Document from Suspect Sources., 442 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Any Evidence Offered by the Government Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) for Failure to Comply with the Rule's Notice Requirement., 446 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005., 441 MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit B)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 453 REPLY TO RESPONSE to Motion by Ghislaine Maxwell re 449 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Introduction of Government's Exhibits 251, 288, 294, 313 and 606., 444 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3., 447 MOTION in Limine to Suppress Identification., 443 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Request for Daubert Hearing., 448 MOTION in Limine to Preclude Law Enforcement Witnesses from Offering Expert Opinion Testimony., 445 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Government Exhibit 52, an Unauthenticated Hearsay Document from Suspect Sources., 442 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Any Evidence Offered by the Government Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) for Failure to Comply with the Rule's Notice Requirement., 446 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Items Purportedly Seized During Search of 358 El Brillo Way on October 20, 2005., 441 MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Filed Under Seal), # 2 Exhibit B (Filed Under Seal), # 3 Exhibit C (Filed Under Seal), # 4 Exhibit D (Filed Under Seal), # 5 Exhibit E)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Main Document 453 replaced on 11/22/2021) (jw). (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 454 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: As discussed at Wednesday's conference, the Court will hold an in-person proceeding on November 15, 2021 at 9:30 a.m. The proceeding will take place in Courtroom 518 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse at 40 Foley Square, New York, New York. In accordance with its prior Order, the Court will ensure access for alleged victims and any members of the Defendant's family. Dkt. No. 344. In order to comply with the District's COVID-19 protocols, the public will be able to access the proceeding in overflow Courtrooms 110 and 506 of the Thurgood Marshall U.S. Courthouse. These overflow rooms will have live video and audio feeds of the proceeding. The use of any electronic devices during the proceeding in the overflow rooms is strictly prohibited. The Court anticipates seating capacity in the overflow rooms for at least 50 members of the public. If capacity is reached, no additional persons will be admitted. Per the S.D.N.Y. Response to COVID-19, anyone who appears at any S.D.N.Y. courthouse must complete a questionnaire on the date of the proceeding prior to entering the courthouse. All visitors must also have their temperature taken when they arrive at the courthouse. Only persons who meet the entry requirements established by the questionnaire and whose temperatures are below 100.4 degrees will be allowed to enter the courthouse. All visitors must wear a mask
DOJ-OGR-00020547

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document