This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) that references the Bill Cosby case as legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements. It contains an email from former D.A. Bruce Castor to D.A. Risa Ferman dated September 23, 2015. In the email, Castor explains that in 2005 he intentionally promised not to prosecute Cosby criminally to strip him of Fifth Amendment protections, thereby forcing him to testify in a civil deposition for the benefit of the victim, Andrea Constand.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin R. Steele | First Assistant District Attorney |
Present during initial stages of revived investigation; later elected District Attorney.
|
| Bill Cosby | Defendant |
Subject of the investigation and civil suit discussed in the document.
|
| Brian J. McMonagle | Defense Attorney |
One of Cosby's new lawyers.
|
| Patrick J. O’Conner | Defense Attorney |
One of Cosby's new lawyers.
|
| Risa Vetri Ferman | District Attorney |
Addressed as 'Risa' and 'D.A. Ferman'; recipient of the email from Castor.
|
| Bruce Castor | Former District Attorney |
Sent the email explaining his 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby.
|
| Andrea Constand | Victim / Plaintiff |
Referred to as '[Constand]'; plaintiff in the civil suit against Cosby.
|
| Walter Phillips | Defense Attorney |
Referred to as '[Attorney] Phillips'; represented Cosby in 2005, deceased at time of email.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Commonwealth |
Refers to the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania prosecution.
|
|
| District Attorney's Office |
Implied organization for Steele, Ferman, and Castor (Montgomery County).
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction mentioned in footnote regarding Kevin R. Steele.
|
"I concluded that the best way to achieve justice was to create an atmosphere where [Constand] would have the best chance of prevailing in a civil suit against Cosby."Source
"I intentionally and specifically bound the Commonwealth that there would be no state prosecution of Cosby in order to remove from him the ability to claim his Fifth Amendment protection against self-incrimination, thus forcing him to sit for a deposition under oath."Source
"I can see no possibility that Cosby’s deposition could be used in a state criminal case, because I would have to testify as to what happened, and the deposition would be subject to suppression."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,738 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document