Andrea Constand

Person
Mentions
23
Relationships
7
Events
10
Documents
11

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
7 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person William Henry Cosby Jr.
Alleged victim alleged assailant
6
1
View
person Bill Cosby
Adversarial
5
1
View
person Bill Cosby
Accused accuser
1
1
View
person Bill Cosby
Legal representative
1
1
View
person Dolores Troiani
Client
1
1
View
person William Cosby
Accuser accused
1
1
View
person Bill Cosby
Accuser accused
1
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A N/A Settlement negotiation between Cosby (via Schmitt) and Constand. Unknown View
N/A N/A Constand and her mother confronted Cosby. Unspecified View
2005-01-01 Report to police Andrea Constand reported Mr. Cosby’s conduct to the police. N/A View
2005-01-01 N/A Bruce Castor learns of and investigates Constand's claim Montgomery County View
2005-01-01 N/A Andrea Constand reports conduct to police. Pennsylvania View
2004-01-01 N/A Andrea Constand reported William Cosby sexually assaulted her Cheltenham residence View
2004-01-01 N/A Sexual abuse alleged by Constand. Pennsylvania View
2004-01-01 N/A Sexual offense incident occurred. Cheltenham Township View
2004-01-01 Alleged assault Andrea Constand alleged that Mr. Cosby sexually assaulted her in his residence. N/A View
2004-01-01 N/A Alleged sexual assault of Andrea Constand by Bill Cosby (referenced in letter). Cosby's residence View

EFTA00010414.pdf

This document is a legal letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison Nathan, dated July 2, 2021. The defense cites a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision overturning Bill Cosby's conviction due to a violation of a non-prosecution promise, arguing that this precedent supports dismissing charges against Maxwell based on the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the government is violating due process by reneging on the specific immunity granted to Maxwell in the NPA.

Legal correspondence / court filing
2025-12-25

DOJ-OGR-00004861.jpg

This document is Page 49 of a larger filing (Document 310-1) in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text is an excerpt from a legal opinion (likely the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion in Commonwealth v. Cosby) discussing the legal effect of D.A. Bruce Castor's 2005 decision not to prosecute Bill Cosby. It serves as legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) and whether a prosecutor's promise not to charge a defendant is binding and prevents future prosecution. This case law was cited in the Maxwell trial because Maxwell's defense argued that Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement in Florida should shield her from federal prosecution.

Legal opinion / court exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004860.jpg

This document is page 48 of a court filing (Exhibit 310-1) from the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), filed on July 2, 2021. However, the content of the page is an excerpt from the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion *Commonwealth v. Cosby* (2020), detailing the legal issues surrounding Bill Cosby's appeal, specifically concerning a non-prosecution agreement made by District Attorney Castor in 2005. This legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements was likely cited by Maxwell's defense team to argue similar issues regarding Epstein's plea deal.

Court filing / legal opinion (exhibit)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004858.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) referencing the legal precedent of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*. It discusses the validity of non-prosecution agreements (NPAs), specifically analyzing why Cosby's claim of immunity based on a District Attorney's promise was rejected by the Superior Court. It also cites *Commonwealth v. Stipetich* to argue that police promises cannot bind a District Attorney's office to non-prosecution agreements.

Court filing / legal brief (case 1:20-cr-00330-pae - united states v. ghislaine maxwell)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004837.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), but the content describes the legal precedent of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*. It details former DA Bruce Castor's testimony regarding his decision not to prosecute Bill Cosby in 2005 to facilitate a civil suit, asserting he did not grant permanent immunity. It includes testimony from Andrea Constand's attorneys stating they were unaware of any non-prosecution agreement at the time.

Legal filing / court opinion / exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004830.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically referencing the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion regarding Bill Cosby ([J-100-2020]). It details former D.A. Bruce Castor's explanation to D.A. Ferman regarding his 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby; Castor explains this was a strategic move to strip Cosby of his 5th Amendment protections, thereby forcing him to testify in a civil suit filed by Andrea Constand. This document was likely filed by Maxwell's defense to establish legal precedent regarding the binding nature of Non-Prosecution Agreements (NPAs).

Legal filing / court exhibit (excerpt from pa supreme court opinion filed in us v. maxwell)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004829.jpg

This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) that references the Bill Cosby case as legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements. It contains an email from former D.A. Bruce Castor to D.A. Risa Ferman dated September 23, 2015. In the email, Castor explains that in 2005 he intentionally promised not to prosecute Cosby criminally to strip him of Fifth Amendment protections, thereby forcing him to testify in a civil deposition for the benefit of the victim, Andrea Constand.

Court filing / legal opinion excerpt
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004828.jpg

This document is an excerpt from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 07/02/21) discussing the legal history of the Bill Cosby case, likely cited as precedent in the Ghislaine Maxwell/Epstein proceedings regarding non-prosecution agreements. It details Cosby's admission to using Quaaludes for sex, his $3.38 million settlement with Andrea Constand, and the reopening of the criminal investigation by D.A. Risa Vetri Ferman after civil records were unsealed in 2015. It also notes a $20,000 payment to Constand from American Media, Inc.

Legal court filing / exhibit (pennsylvania supreme court opinion excerpt filed in federal court)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004824.jpg

This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), appearing to cite the precedent of the Bill Cosby case (Commonwealth v. Cosby). The text details former D.A. Bruce Castor's legal strategy to issue a non-prosecution statement for Bill Cosby specifically to prevent him from invoking the Fifth Amendment in a civil suit filed by Andrea Constand. It includes the text of a press release announcing the conclusion of the investigation into the January 2004 allegations.

Legal filing / court exhibit (excerpt of legal opinion/brief)
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004814.jpg

This document is a page from a Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion (Commonwealth v. Cosby) written by Justice Wecht, decided on June 30, 2021. While the text concerns the prosecution of Bill Cosby and District Attorney Bruce Castor's 2005 decision not to prosecute due to lack of evidence, the header indicates this document was filed as an exhibit (Document 310-1) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, which is the federal criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell. The Cosby case was likely cited in the Maxwell proceedings as a legal precedent regarding the validity of non-prosecution agreements.

Court opinion / legal exhibit
2025-11-20

DOJ-OGR-00004810.jpg

This legal letter, dated July 2, 2021, from Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan, cites the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision vacating William Henry Cosby Jr.'s conviction. The letter argues that this precedent supports Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges, as the government allegedly failed to honor a non-prosecution agreement, similar to the District Attorney's office in the Cosby case. It details the circumstances of the Cosby case, including Andrea Constand's allegations and the initial decision by DA Bruce Castor not to prosecute due to insufficient evidence.

Legal letter
2025-11-20
Total Received
$3,400,000.00
5 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$3,400,000.00
5 total transactions
Date Type From To Amount Description Actions
N/A Received Bill Cosby Andrea Constand $0.00 Settlement agreement negotiated by Attorney Sch... View
N/A Received Bill Cosby Andrea Constand $0.00 Cosby paying [Constand] a lot of money, a large... View
N/A Received Bill Cosby Andrea Constand $3,380,000.00 Settlement of civil suit View
N/A Received ICA Andrea Constand $20,000.00 Payment resulting from an interview Cosby gave ... View
N/A Received Bill Cosby Andrea Constand $0.00 Offer to pay for education and set up a trust (... View
As Sender
0
As Recipient
1
Total
1

Unknown

From: Bill Cosby
To: Andrea Constand

Phone calls were being recorded

Call
N/A

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity