District Attorney's Office
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
organization
The Post
|
Adversarial investigative |
5
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Lenient treatment of Epstein | New York | View |
| N/A | N/A | District Attorney's Office decision to argue for leniency | New York | View |
| 2005-01-01 | N/A | Criminal investigation into Cosby. | Pennsylvania | View |
EFTA00037319.pdf
This document is an internal FBI email thread from August 2019 discussing a media inquiry from Washington Post reporter Deanna Paul. An FBI agent forwards the request to Martin Feely and Adrienne Senatore in the Office of Public Affairs, noting that while the request is broadly about sex trafficking cases where the 'line between victim and subject may be blurred,' it is 'obviously re: Epstein.' The email also establishes a prior professional relationship between the forwarding agent and the reporter from her time as an ADA in Brooklyn.
EFTA00010414.pdf
This document is a legal letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's defense counsel to Judge Alison Nathan, dated July 2, 2021. The defense cites a recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision overturning Bill Cosby's conviction due to a violation of a non-prosecution promise, arguing that this precedent supports dismissing charges against Maxwell based on the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). The letter contends that the government is violating due process by reneging on the specific immunity granted to Maxwell in the NPA.
DOJ-OGR-00004876.jpg
This document is Page 64 of 80 from an exhibit filed on July 2, 2021, in the case of USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The content itself is an excerpt from a judicial opinion (likely the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling in Commonwealth v. Cosby) discussing District Attorney Bruce Castor's decision not to prosecute Bill Cosby. The text analyzes the specific wording of a press release issued by Castor, arguing that his statement about 'reconsidering this decision' referred to his decision not to speak publicly, rather than his decision not to prosecute. This document was likely submitted in the Maxwell case to argue legal precedents regarding non-prosecution agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00004874.jpg
This document is a page from a legal opinion (Commonwealth v. Cosby) filed as an exhibit in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). It discusses the legal implications of a prosecutor's decision not to prosecute a suspect (Cosby) and whether such a decision binds future prosecutors. The text argues that prosecutors cannot induce a suspect to give up rights (like self-incrimination protections) by promising non-prosecution, only to reverse course later. This precedent was likely cited in the Maxwell case regarding the validity of the Epstein Non-Prosecution Agreement.
DOJ-OGR-00004861.jpg
This document is Page 49 of a larger filing (Document 310-1) in the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The text is an excerpt from a legal opinion (likely the Pennsylvania Supreme Court opinion in Commonwealth v. Cosby) discussing the legal effect of D.A. Bruce Castor's 2005 decision not to prosecute Bill Cosby. It serves as legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements (NPAs) and whether a prosecutor's promise not to charge a defendant is binding and prevents future prosecution. This case law was cited in the Maxwell trial because Maxwell's defense argued that Jeffrey Epstein's 2007 Non-Prosecution Agreement in Florida should shield her from federal prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00004858.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) referencing the legal precedent of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*. It discusses the validity of non-prosecution agreements (NPAs), specifically analyzing why Cosby's claim of immunity based on a District Attorney's promise was rejected by the Superior Court. It also cites *Commonwealth v. Stipetich* to argue that police promises cannot bind a District Attorney's office to non-prosecution agreements.
DOJ-OGR-00004838.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), likely submitted as case law or precedent regarding Non-Prosecution Agreements (NPAs). The text details testimony from the Bill Cosby case (Commonwealth v. Cosby), focusing on whether a valid non-prosecution agreement existed between District Attorney Castor and Cosby. Witnesses testify that no such promise was mentioned during civil depositions or settlement negotiations, contradicting claims of an 'irrevocable commitment' not to prosecute.
DOJ-OGR-00004837.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-PAE), but the content describes the legal precedent of *Commonwealth v. Cosby*. It details former DA Bruce Castor's testimony regarding his decision not to prosecute Bill Cosby in 2005 to facilitate a civil suit, asserting he did not grant permanent immunity. It includes testimony from Andrea Constand's attorneys stating they were unaware of any non-prosecution agreement at the time.
DOJ-OGR-00004835.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) that references the Bill Cosby case as legal precedent. It details the testimony of former DA Bruce Castor regarding his 2005 decision not to prosecute Cosby, arguing that this was done to strip Cosby of Fifth Amendment privileges and aid the victim (Constand) in a civil suit. The text highlights a 2015 email from Castor to DA Risa Vetri Ferman asserting that he had bound the Commonwealth against future state prosecution.
DOJ-OGR-00004829.jpg
This document is a page from a court filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) that references the Bill Cosby case as legal precedent regarding non-prosecution agreements. It contains an email from former D.A. Bruce Castor to D.A. Risa Ferman dated September 23, 2015. In the email, Castor explains that in 2005 he intentionally promised not to prosecute Cosby criminally to strip him of Fifth Amendment protections, thereby forcing him to testify in a civil deposition for the benefit of the victim, Andrea Constand.
DOJ-OGR-00004825.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell) containing a historical press release or statement by District Attorney Castor regarding the investigation into Bill Cosby. The text details the chain of custody for the complaint (Canada to Philadelphia to Cheltenham), the cooperation of all parties, and the subsequent investigation including a search of Cosby's home. Ultimately, DA Castor announces the decision to decline criminal charges due to insufficient admissible evidence to prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, while noting that a civil action remains possible.
DOJ-OGR-00004824.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in the Ghislaine Maxwell case (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), appearing to cite the precedent of the Bill Cosby case (Commonwealth v. Cosby). The text details former D.A. Bruce Castor's legal strategy to issue a non-prosecution statement for Bill Cosby specifically to prevent him from invoking the Fifth Amendment in a civil suit filed by Andrea Constand. It includes the text of a press release announcing the conclusion of the investigation into the January 2004 allegations.
DOJ-OGR-00004822.jpg
This document is a page from a legal filing in United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE), specifically citing the Commonwealth v. Cosby case regarding District Attorney Bruce Castor's 2005 decision not to prosecute Bill Cosby. The text details Castor's reasoning, citing Andrea Constand's delay in reporting, inconsistencies in her statements, lack of forensic evidence found at the Cheltenham residence, and her continued contact with Cosby after the alleged assault. It notes that the pills provided by Cosby were confirmed to be Benadryl.
DOJ-OGR-00004810.jpg
This legal letter, dated July 2, 2021, from Cohen & Gresser LLP to Judge Alison J. Nathan, cites the recent Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision vacating William Henry Cosby Jr.'s conviction. The letter argues that this precedent supports Ghislaine Maxwell's supplemental motion to dismiss charges, as the government allegedly failed to honor a non-prosecution agreement, similar to the District Attorney's office in the Cosby case. It details the circumstances of the Cosby case, including Andrea Constand's allegations and the initial decision by DA Bruce Castor not to prosecute due to insufficient evidence.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018536.jpg
This document appears to be a page from an essay or blog post analyzing the philosophical and legal definitions of 'sex' versus 'BDSM.' It discusses the subjectivity of sexual definitions, using the Bill Clinton/Monica Lewinsky scandal as an example of the ambiguity of 'oral sex.' It further details a 2009 legal shift in New York City where the Manhattan DA's office redefined 'sexual conduct' to include BDSM activities, leading to the arrest of professional dominatrixes. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT' footer, suggesting it was included as evidence in a congressional investigation, likely related to sex work legislation or trafficking.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016503.jpg
This document is page 16 of a legal filing submitted by 'the Post' (likely a media organization) arguing against the wholesale sealing of appellate briefs in a case involving Jeffrey Epstein. Citing New York Civil Rights Law and case precedents, the Post argues that the District Attorney should only be permitted to redact the names of victims to protect their identities, rather than keeping the entire record sealed. The document includes a footnote discussing the Post's inability to notify victims directly due to lack of knowledge of their identities.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016483.jpg
This document is the second page (signature page) of a legal letter dated January 4, 2019. It is signed by Robert D. Balin of the law firm Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. Copies were sent via email to Assistant District Attorney Karen Friedman Agnifino and attorney Martin G. Weinberg. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity