This document contains an email chain between US Attorney's Office prosecutors (including Jason Swergold) and defense attorneys (Aida Leisenring) regarding discovery materials related to the 'July 23 Incident' (Epstein's first suicide attempt). The defense requests access to hallway video surveillance, photos/video of Cell 124, and physical inspection of an 'orange rope.' The prosecution confirms they are investigating if these items exist or were preserved, specifically noting skepticism about the need to physically inspect the rope.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jason Swergold | Co-Chief, Narcotics Unit (USANYS) |
Sender of email regarding discovery materials; responding to defense counsel requests.
|
| Aida Leisenring | Attorney |
Defense attorney at Barket, Epstein, Kearon, Aldea & LoTurco LLP; requesting evidence (rope, video).
|
| Bruce Barket | Attorney |
Cc'd on the email chain; partner at Barket Epstein.
|
| Maurene | Prosecutor (implied) |
Addressed in Aida Leisenring's email ('Hello Jason and Maurene'). Likely Maurene Comey.
|
| Unknown Sender 1 | Co-Chief, Narcotics Unit |
Internal email participant discussing sonogram appointment.
|
| Unknown Sender 2 | Government Official/Prosecutor |
Internal email participant discussing meeting schedule and plea in White Plains.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
"If the orange rope was preserved, we would like to view it in person."Source
"We are also looking into whether the orange rope was preserved and if it was, we will let you know our position on whether it can be made available for inspection."Source
"It is our understanding that there may be photographs or a video recording of cell 124 that would have been taken shortly after the incident."Source
"As discussed briefly, since you have reviewed a photograph of the rope, we are not sure the basis for a physical inspection"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,773 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document