Aida Leisenring
PersonRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Bruce Barket
|
Business associate |
3
|
3 | |
|
person
Jason Swergold
|
Opposing counsel |
2
|
2 | |
|
person
[Redacted USANYS Prosecutor]
|
Opposing counsel |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Nicholas Tartaglione
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Tartaglione
|
Client |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | N/A | Discovery that video footage was not retained | N/A | View |
| 2019-12-13 | N/A | Review of sensitive disclosure materials at US Attorney's office (referred to as 'Friday' in Dec ... | US Attorney's Office | View |
| 2019-12-13 | N/A | Review of sensitive disclosure materials at US Attorney's office | USANYS Office | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Attorney Aida Leisenring visited inmate Tartaglione. | MCC New York | View |
| 2019-07-24 | N/A | Aida Leisenring visit with Tartaglione | MCC | View |
EFTA00032123.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 1, 2020, between attorney Bruce Barket and redacted officials regarding the safety of inmate Mr. Tartaglione at the MCC. Barket argues that Tartaglione, a retired police officer previously assaulted in custody, is being forced to choose between an unsafe general population tier or the SHU (solitary), despite previously being in a safe cell. Barket urges officials to return Tartaglione to his previous safe housing arrangement.
EFTA00030995.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 20-22, 2020, involving defense attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The subject concerns a letter regarding 'jail conditions and court appearance,' specifically citing 'COVID stuff at MCC' (Metropolitan Correctional Center). The USANYS staff discusses coordinating a response to Judge Karas by the following Monday.
EFTA00030707.pdf
This document is an email chain from September 10, 2019, between attorneys regarding the case 'US v. Tartaglione' (16-cr-832). Al-Amyn Sumar of The New York Times Company informed Bruce Barket and others that a letter had been faxed to the Court on behalf of the NYT and reporter Ben Weiser concerning the unsealing of records. Bruce Barket acknowledged receipt of the email.
EFTA00030552.pdf
An email chain from November 2019 between defense attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (SDNY). Barket requests statements made by inmate Nicholas Tartaglione and video footage regarding Jeffrey Epstein's attempted suicide on July 22-23, 2019. The US Attorney's Office agrees to produce Tartaglione's statements but explicitly denies the request for the suicide attempt video and reports, claiming they are not relevant to the case.
EFTA00029704.pdf
This document is an email thread from March 3, 2020, between attorney Bruce Barket and an official (likely at the MCC prison). Barket inquires if his client, 'Nick' (likely Nicholas Tartaglione), will be allowed to appear in court the following day despite the MCC being on lockdown for a week, citing the 'inhumanity' of the 24/7 lockdown. The official responds briefly confirming that they are still producing inmates for court.
EFTA00028448.pdf
Email correspondence between defense attorney Bruce Barket and government prosecutors regarding conditions at the MCC for client 'Nick' (Nicholas Tartaglione). The emails discuss requests to inspect the cell and physical evidence related to the 'July 23rd suicide attempt' (referencing the incident involving Jeffrey Epstein), complaints about extreme heat in the unit, and difficulties securing family visits for the client facing the death penalty.
EFTA00028384.pdf
This document is an email chain from July 5, 2019, initiated by attorney Bruce Barket regarding his client 'Nick' (likely Nicholas Tartaglione) at the MCC. Barket complains that Nick was placed in the SHU following a cellphone allegation, describes poor sanitary conditions (leaking toilet), and urgently requests the return of seized privileged legal documents. Assistant U.S. Attorneys and staff attorneys discuss scheduling a call for the following Monday to address the SHU conditions and the cellphone issue.
EFTA00026669.pdf
Legal correspondence from July 5, 2019, between attorney Bruce Barket and MCC New York staff regarding his client 'Nick' (likely Nicholas Tartaglione). Barket complains that Nick was moved to the SHU (Special Housing Unit) over a cell phone allegation, where he faces a leaking toilet and the loss of personal property and privileged legal documents. An MCC Staff Attorney responds that they inspected the previous cell on '5 North', found some papers and books, and returned relevant items to the inmate.
EFTA00026640.pdf
This document is an email chain involving Bruce Barket (attorney for Nicholas Tartaglione, referred to as 'Nick') and staff at the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) and the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC). Barket complains that his client was placed in the SHU due to an alleged cell phone possession, citing poor conditions (leaking toilet) and the seizure of privileged legal documents. The government attorneys correspond to schedule a call to discuss the SHU conditions and the cell phone issue. This correspondence occurs in July 2019, shortly before/during the time Jeffrey Epstein was incarcerated at MCC.
EFTA00023680.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 20-21, 2020, involving attorney Bruce Barket of Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP and the US Attorney's Office (Narcotics Unit). The subject concerns a 'Letter regarding jail conditions and court appearance' and a 'Continued Inhumane Prison' attachment sent to Judge Karas. The USANYS Co-Chief of the Narcotics Unit requests an urgent call to discuss the matter, citing a Monday deadline.
EFTA00020127.pdf
This document is an email chain dated August 12, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's death. Attorney Bruce Barket writes to the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) asserting that his client, Mr. Tartaglione (presumably Epstein's cellmate), must not be questioned regarding Epstein's suicide or the associated FBI/IG investigations without counsel present. Assistant US Attorney Maurene responds, noting that she and 'Jason' are not handling the death investigation but will forward the request to the appropriate prosecutors.
EFTA00019900.pdf
This document is an email chain between attorney Aida Leisenring and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) regarding the preservation of video surveillance from the MCC. Leisenring requested footage from the hallway outside her client Tartaglione's cell covering the 'Epstein incident' on July 22-23, 2019. In December 2019, Leisenring expressed surprise that the video was not retained despite her earlier request and confirmation from officials.
EFTA00019111.pdf
An email chain from June 2020 involving attorney Bruce Barket acknowledging receipt of a sealed ex parte order from Judge Karas regarding case 16cr832. The correspondence involves defense counsel, firewall counsel, and representatives from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS).
EFTA00016974.pdf
An email from attorney Bruce Barket dated January 16, 2020, discussing legal hurdles with the MCC (Metropolitan Correctional Center). Barket outlines issues regarding access to the cell where his client 'Nick' (Nicholas Tartaglione) has been held, the refusal of officials to provide physical evidence regarding the 'July 23rd suicide attempt' (referencing the Jeffrey Epstein incident), and poor jail conditions including extreme heat.
EFTA00016973.pdf
An email dated January 10, 2020, from attorney Bruce Barket to a redacted recipient requesting to schedule a viewing of physical evidence related to Jeffery Epstein's July 23rd attempted suicide. The email notes that Epstein was incarcerated in the same cell as Mr. Tartaglione at the time of the incident.
EFTA00016904.pdf
This document contains an email chain between US Attorney's Office prosecutors (including Jason Swergold) and defense attorneys (Aida Leisenring) regarding discovery materials related to the 'July 23 Incident' (Epstein's first suicide attempt). The defense requests access to hallway video surveillance, photos/video of Cell 124, and physical inspection of an 'orange rope.' The prosecution confirms they are investigating if these items exist or were preserved, specifically noting skepticism about the need to physically inspect the rope.
EFTA00016403.pdf
This document is an email chain from December 2019 between the US Attorney's Office (specifically the Narcotics Unit handling the Epstein case) and defense attorney Aida Leisenring. The defense is requesting access to video surveillance of the hallway and Cell 124, as well as a physical inspection of the 'orange rope' related to the July 23 incident (Epstein's suicide attempt). The prosecution confirms they are investigating the existence/preservation of these items but challenges the necessity of physically inspecting the rope.
EFTA00016401.pdf
This document is an email thread from December 2019 between defense attorney Aida Leisenring and federal prosecutors (USANYS) regarding discovery materials related to the 'July 23 incident' involving Jeffrey Epstein. The defense requests access to video surveillance of the hallway, photos/video of Cell 124, and physical inspection of an 'orange rope'. The prosecution confirms they are investigating the existence/preservation of these items but questions the necessity of physically inspecting the rope.
EFTA00015994.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2019 between attorney Bruce Barket and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The correspondence concerns a discovery request for statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's attempted suicide on July 22-23, 2019. While the USANYS agreed to produce reports of Tartaglione's statements, they explicitly refused to produce reports and video of the attempted suicide itself, deeming them irrelevant to the current case.
EFTA00015932.pdf
This document is an email chain between defense attorneys (Michael Bachrach and Bruce Barket) and the US Attorney's Office (USANYS). The attorneys are requesting records of statements made by inmate Mr. Tartaglione regarding Jeffrey Epstein's reported suicide attempt on July 22-23, 2019. The defense argues this is 'Rule 16' discovery material relevant to a 'penalty phase' (likely Tartaglione's capital case), while the government discusses the procedural requirements (Touhy regulations vs. Rule 16).
EFTA00010427.pdf
This document is an email chain from August 2020 between the US Attorney's Office (USANYS), the Chambers of Judge Karas (NYSD), and defense attorney Bruce Barket of the firm Barket Epstein Kearon Aldea & LoTurco, LLP. The correspondence concerns the submission of letters regarding jail conditions (specifically at the MCC) and court appearances pursuant to a court order. The emails indicate coordination between the defense, the prosecution (Narcotics Unit), and the Judge regarding filings and memo endorsements.
Re: Follow Up on July 23 Incident Sensitive Disclosure Ma...
Responding to discovery requests regarding video of hallway/cell and the 'orange rope'. Stating they are looking into whether the rope was preserved.
Re: Preservation request
Expressing surprise that video was not retained despite specific preservation request and prior confirmation.
Re: Preservation request
Stating 'We'll follow up again' in response to Aida's surprise that video was not retained.
Re: Follow Up on July 23 Incident Sensitive Disclosure Ma...
Confirming they are looking into video existence and orange rope preservation. Questioning the need for physical inspection of the rope since photos were reviewed.
Re: Follow Up on July 23 Incident Sensitive Disclosure Ma...
Response confirming they are looking into video of hallway/cell and preservation of the 'orange rope'. Questions necessity of physical inspection of rope since photo was reviewed.
Follow Up on July 23 Incident Sensitive Disclosure Materials
Requesting video surveillance of hallway, photos/video of cell 124, and physical inspection of the orange rope related to the July 23 incident.
Follow Up on July 23 Incident Sensitive Disclosure Materials
Requesting to view preserved video surveillance of the hallway, photos/video of cell 124, and the 'orange rope' in person.
Follow Up on July 23 Incident Sensitive Disclosure Materials
Requesting video surveillance of hallway, photos/video of cell 124, and physical inspection of the orange rope related to the July 23 incident.
Preservation request (implied)
Requesting preservation of video surveillance outside Tartaglione's cell regarding the Epstein incident.
Preservation request
Requesting preservation of video surveillance outside Tartaglione's cell regarding the Epstein incident on July 23.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity