HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352.jpg
1.61 MB
Extraction Summary
8
People
2
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
3
Relationships
6
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal filing / investigative report (house oversight committee)
File Size:
1.61 MB
Summary
This document outlines statements attributed to Jeffrey Epstein regarding his legal challenges, including minimizing his Florida conviction and disparaging victims as seeking a 'meal ticket.' It specifically alleges Epstein committed perjury during a February 17, 2010 deposition by denying he knew journalist George Rush, despite having given him a recorded interview. The text also details Epstein's defense of Ghislaine Maxwell and his animosity toward attorney Bradley Edwards.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Defendant/Subject |
Subject of the allegations; accused of perjury regarding his knowledge of George Rush; made various claims minimizing...
|
| Bradley J. Edwards | Attorney |
Identified by Epstein as the person 'causing all of Epstein's problems' via civil suits; subpoenaed Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Jane Doe | Plaintiff/Victim |
Plaintiff in civil suits brought by Edwards.
|
| L.M. | Plaintiff/Victim |
Plaintiff in case 50-2008-CA-028051; Epstein claimed she came to him as a prostitute and drug user.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Associate |
Subpoenaed by Edwards; defended by Epstein as a 'good person'; described in parenthetical as having 'helped procure y...
|
| Jane Doe 102 | Plaintiff/Victim |
Alleged 15-year-old victim trafficked nationally and internationally; Epstein dismissed her allegations as ridiculous.
|
| Michael J. Fisten | Affiant |
Provided an affidavit attached as Exhibit QQ.
|
| George Rush | Journalist/Interviewer |
Associated with New York Daily News; conducted a tape-recorded interview with Epstein which Epstein later denied unde...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| New York Daily News |
Employer of George Rush.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Relationships (3)
Epstein defended her as a 'good person'; text notes she 'helped procure young girls'.
Epstein claimed Edwards was 'causing all of Epstein's problems'.
Epstein gave a tape-recorded interview to Rush but later denied knowing him.
Key Quotes (6)
"He (Epstein) had gone to jail in Florida for soliciting prostitution for no reason"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352.jpg
Quote #1
"If the same thing (i.e., sexual abuse of minor girls) had happened in New York, he (Epstein) would have received only a $200 fine"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352.jpg
Quote #2
"Bradley J. Edwards was the one causing all of Epstein’s problems"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352.jpg
Quote #3
"All the girls suing him are only trying to get a meal ticket"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352.jpg
Quote #4
"she was a good person that did nothing wrong (i.e., had done nothing wrong even though she helped procure young girls to satisfy Epstein’s sexual desires)"Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352.jpg
Quote #5
"The Rush interview also demonstrated perjury (a federal crime) on the part of Epstein."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352.jpg
Quote #6
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,941 characters)
• He (Epstein) had gone to jail in Florida for soliciting prostitution for no reason;
• If the same thing (i.e., sexual abuse of minor girls) had happened in New York, he (Epstein) would have received only a $200 fine;
• Bradley J. Edwards was the one causing all of Epstein’s problems (i.e., the civil suits brought by Jane Doe and other girls);
• L.M. came to him as a prostitute and a drug user (i.e., came to Epstein for sex, rather than Epstein pursuing her);
• All the girls suing him are only trying to get a meal ticket;
• The only thing he might have done wrong was to maybe cross the line a little too closely;
• He (Epstein) was very upset that Edwards had subpoenaed Ghisline Maxwell, that she was a good person that did nothing wrong (i.e., had done nothing wrong even though she helped procure young girls to satisfy Epstein’s sexual desires);
• With regard to Jane Doe 102 v. Epstein, which involved an allegation that Epstein had repeatedly sexually abused a 15-year-old girl, forced her to have sex with his friends, and flew her on his private plane nationally and internationally for the purposes of sexually molesting and abusing her, he (Epstein) flippantly said that the case was dismissed, indicating that the allegations were ridiculous and untrue.
See Affidavit of Michael J. Fisten attached hereto as Exhibit “QQ.”
81. The Rush interview also demonstrated perjury (a federal crime) on the part of Epstein. Epstein lied about not knowing George Rush. See Epstein Deposition, February 17, 2010, taken in L.M. v. Jeffrey Epstein, case 50-2008-CA-028051, page 154, line 4 through 155 line 9, (Deposition attachment #7), wherein Jeffrey Epstein clearly impresses that he does not recognize George Rush from the New York Daily News. This impression was given despite the fact that he gave a lengthy personal interview about details of the case that was tape recorded with George Rush.
34
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_013352
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document