| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Robert Josephsberg
|
Client |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim abuser |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Royalty (Prince Andrew implied)
|
Alleged abuse |
5
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert C. Josefsberg
|
Client |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Victim perpetrator |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Jeffrey Epstein
|
Adversarial |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Robert Josefsberg
|
Legal representative |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
Heads of state
|
Sexual exploitation |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | N/A | Sexual abuse of Jane Doe 102 (15 year old girl) involving flights and Epstein's friends. | Private plane / National / ... | View |
| N/A | N/A | Epstein's Birthday Party | Epstein's property | View |
| N/A | N/A | Settlement of Jane Doe 102's claim | N/A | View |
| 2025-11-15 | N/A | Recruitment of Jane Doe 102 | Location of discovery/luring | View |
| 2009-06-04 | N/A | Filing of Reply to Defendant's Response to Motion for a No-Contact Order | US District Court, Southern... | View |
| 2009-05-26 | N/A | Motion for Order for Preservation of Evidence filed and Order Entered on Docket. | West Palm Beach, FL | View |
| 2009-05-01 | N/A | Issuance of Summons in Civil Case 09-80656 | Southern District of Florida | View |
| 2009-01-01 | N/A | Settlement reached between Epstein and Jane Doe 102. | Unknown | View |
| 1998-01-01 | N/A | A key witness (Jane Doe 102) was drawn into Epstein's exploitative world at age 15. | Unknown | View |
This document is a Motion for a Protective Order filed by plaintiff M.J. on November 11, 2010, requesting the court bar Jeffrey Epstein from direct or indirect contact. The motion details a pattern of Epstein using private investigators to harass and intimidate victims and witnesses, specifically citing an incident on July 1, 2010, where a PI named Thaddeus Knowles followed 'Jane Doe' and flashed lights into her home. It also references Epstein's intimidation of other witnesses including Sarah Kellen, Leslie Groff, and Alfredo Rodriguez, and his history of violating no-contact orders.
A summons issued by the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 1, 2009, for Case Number 09-80656. The summons is directed to Jeffrey Epstein, located at the Palm Beach County Stockade, notifying him of a lawsuit filed by Plaintiff Jane Doe 102. It lists his defense counsel as Jack A. Goldberger and Robert D. Critton, Jr., and requires a response to the plaintiff's attorneys, Podhurst Orseck, P.A., within 20 days.
This document is an email chain from June 2010 involving an FBI Special Agent in San Francisco. An author/documentarian contacts the FBI to warn that Jeffrey Epstein plans to leave the US permanently after his house arrest ends on July 21, 2010. The sender identifies a specific victim, Jane Doe 102 (Case # 09-80656), currently living in Australia, as a key witness who was trafficked on Epstein's plane to perform sexual acts with high-profile individuals including heads of state and royalty.
This page from a legal filing details allegations against Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, specifically focusing on 'Jane Doe 102,' who was lured at age 15 and forced into sex slavery involving politicians, businessmen, and royalty. It mentions a disturbing incident where the victim watched Epstein with three 12-year-old French girls sent to him as a birthday gift by a friend. The document also notes that Epstein paid settlements to over 15 women to avoid civil suits.
This page of a legal filing details a specific sexual incident involving Jeffrey Epstein and a victim identified as 'S.G.', including graphic descriptions of Epstein's body. The document asserts that while 'Edwards' believes the victim count exceeds forty, evidence suggests the number of underage girls molested is in the hundreds. It also references Epstein invoking the 5th Amendment during a 2010 deposition and discusses negotiations between Epstein's legal team and the U.S. Attorney's Office to avoid federal felony charges.
An email chain dating from March 4, 2011, initiated by a media inquiry from Annette Witheridge of The Mail on Sunday regarding an upcoming story involving allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell, Jeffrey Epstein, and Prince Andrew. The inquiry details specific sexual allegations involving a 15-year-old girl at Epstein's Palm Beach house. This inquiry was forwarded from lawyer Mark Cohen to Maxwell, then from Maxwell to Epstein, and finally from Epstein to Alan Dershowitz.
This document is a letter from Annette Witheridge of the Mail on Sunday to Brett Jaffe, requesting urgent responses to a series of allegations regarding Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein. The 14 specific points detail allegations of sexual abuse, trafficking, and interactions with high-profile figures such as Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, and Ehud Barak, often involving a redacted victim.
This document is a page from a legal affidavit, likely by an attorney representing Epstein's victims. It details a taped conversation between Jeffrey Epstein and journalist George Rush, in which Epstein reportedly admitted to crossing the line but claimed his actions warranted only a '$100 fine' and showed no remorse. The document also discusses a retaliatory lawsuit filed by Epstein against attorneys Brad Edwards and Scott Rothstein, and mentions specific allegations regarding a 15-year-old victim (Jane Doe 102) trafficked on Epstein's private plane.
This document outlines statements attributed to Jeffrey Epstein regarding his legal challenges, including minimizing his Florida conviction and disparaging victims as seeking a 'meal ticket.' It specifically alleges Epstein committed perjury during a February 17, 2010 deposition by denying he knew journalist George Rush, despite having given him a recorded interview. The text also details Epstein's defense of Ghislaine Maxwell and his animosity toward attorney Bradley Edwards.
This document is a page from a legal filing arguing that the discovery of pilot and flight logs was legally proper in civil cases against Jeffrey Epstein. It explains that this evidence was necessary to support a federal RICO claim depicting Epstein's operation as a criminal enterprise dependent on air travel, as well as to establish a 'federal nexus' for claims under 18 U.S.C. ยง 2255 regarding interstate commerce and telephone usage. The text documents the legal team's strategy despite Judge Marra's dismissal of the RICO claim.
This document, stamped with House Oversight identifiers, appears to be a printout of a news article detailing a lawsuit between Jeffrey Epstein and his former lawyers. It highlights allegations of orgies and sex trafficking involving minors at Little St. James and discusses Epstein's connections to high-profile figures, specifically noting Bill Clinton's flight history on Epstein's jet (2002-2005) and Prince Andrew's 2010 stay at Epstein's NY mansion. The text also references the 2005 investigation initiated by a mother in Palm Beach and mentions a specific victim identified as Jane Doe 102.
This document is a rough draft transcript page (possibly from a congressional oversight hearing) discussing legal proceedings involving an unnamed defendant who invoked the Fifth Amendment and settled a claim with 'Jane Doe 102'. The speaker notes that attorneys Bob Josefsburg and Miss Isell specifically targeted Alan Dershowitz in their questioning during the depositions of Juan Alessi and Alfredo Rodriguez, implying Dershowitz had relevant information regarding the case, which is distinguished from a simple contract dispute.
This document is page 88 of a rough draft transcript, likely from a House Oversight investigation. A speaker discusses representing a victim of sex trafficking and recalls details regarding Alan Dershowitz. The testimony focuses on a legal complaint (Jane Doe 102) filed by Bob Josefsburg, which alleged that one or more 'academicians' sexually abused a victim identified as Jane Doe 3.
This document is page 4 of a printed Daily Mail article from March 16, 2011. It discusses how Epstein's 'dream team' of lawyers and political donations helped him avoid serious sex-trafficking charges and protected his famous friends. It specifically details allegations by 'Jane Doe 102' (who was 15 in 1998) regarding sexual exploitation by Epstein's peers, including 'royalty' (contextually linked to Prince Andrew in the header).
This document appears to be a page from a House Oversight Committee file (016432) containing an excerpt, likely from a news article (possibly Miami Herald), describing Jeffrey Epstein's crimes. It features an aerial photo of his Palm Beach mansion and text outlining his history of luring teenage girls into a 'cult-like sex pyramid scheme' disguised as massage work, long before the #MeToo movement.
This document, part of a House Oversight file, lists numerous serious allegations against Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein, originating from a 'Jane Doe 102 complaint'. The allegations describe Maxwell and Epstein facilitating and participating in sexual encounters, including those involving prominent figures like Prince Andrew, Ehud Barak, and others. The document also mentions surveillance of sex acts, payments for sex, and a helicopter trip piloted by Maxwell for President Bill Clinton.
| Date | Type | From | To | Amount | Description | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N/A | Received | Unnamed defendant | Jane Doe 102 | $0.00 | Settlement/compensation for dropping a legal cl... | View |
| 2009-01-01 | Received | Jeffrey Epstein | Jane Doe 102 | $0.00 | Settlement for 'pennies' (in comparison to his ... | View |
Complaint styled 'Jane Doe 102 versus Epstein'.
Alleged duties included being sexually exploited by Epstein's adult male peers including royalty.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity