DOJ-OGR-00016225.jpg
483 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
483 KB
Summary
This is a page from a court transcript dated August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument between counsel (Ms. Moe) and the judge. Ms. Moe successfully argues for the admission of evidence related to a person's date of birth to prove they were not underage during the 2000s, which the judge deems relevant for rebuttal. The judge then proposes a sidebar with the parties to discuss jury matters.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Counsel |
Speaking to the court, arguing for the relevance of evidence regarding a person's age and date of birth.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the proceedings, ruling on the relevance of evidence, and managing the courtroom.
|
| Ms. Williams | Court personnel |
Mentioned by the Court as the person who will check on the juror members.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion about the admissibility of evidence. Ms. Moe argues that a person's date of birth is relevant to rebut a photograph offered by the defense, showing the person could not have been an underage personal assistant in the 2000s. The Court agrees and allows the evidence.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in a question regarding 'presence in the U.S.'.
|
Relationships (2)
Ms. Moe, as counsel, presents an argument to the Court, addressing the judge as 'your Honor', and the Court rules on her argument.
The Court gives a directive to Ms. Williams to 'check on the juror members', indicating a working relationship within the court system.
Key Quotes (2)
"The testimony with that person was a person -- so her date of birth makes clear that she couldn't have been a personal assistant as an underage girl given her date of birth and given the timing. This would have been in the 2000s."Source
— MS. MOE
(Arguing for the relevance of evidence to counter the defense's portrayal of an individual.)
DOJ-OGR-00016225.jpg
Quote #1
"Rebuttal relevance, I think, is apparent. So I will allow it and we can do it now."Source
— THE COURT
(Ruling in favor of Ms. Moe's argument to admit the evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00016225.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,117 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 9 of 267 2036
LCACmax1
1 presence in the U.S. -- is that part of it or just the age?
2 MS. MOE: Just the age. What we're offering is not a
3 travel record. I think the photograph that was offered by
4 defense counsel is of an adult. The testimony with that person
5 was a person -- so her date of birth makes clear that she
6 couldn't have been a personal assistant as an underage girl
7 given her date of birth and given the timing. This would have
8 been in the 2000s.
9 THE COURT: Rebuttal relevance, I think, is apparent.
10 So I will allow it and we can do it now.
11 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
12 THE COURT: What else can I take up?
13 MS. MOE: Nothing from the government, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Williams will check on the
15 juror members.
16 While we're gathering that, I would like to speak to
17 the parties at sidebar just as to how to address the jury about
18 the followup from the break yesterday.
19 (Continued on next page)
20 (Page 2037 SEALED)
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016225
LCACmax1
1 presence in the U.S. -- is that part of it or just the age?
2 MS. MOE: Just the age. What we're offering is not a
3 travel record. I think the photograph that was offered by
4 defense counsel is of an adult. The testimony with that person
5 was a person -- so her date of birth makes clear that she
6 couldn't have been a personal assistant as an underage girl
7 given her date of birth and given the timing. This would have
8 been in the 2000s.
9 THE COURT: Rebuttal relevance, I think, is apparent.
10 So I will allow it and we can do it now.
11 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
12 THE COURT: What else can I take up?
13 MS. MOE: Nothing from the government, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: Okay. Ms. Williams will check on the
15 juror members.
16 While we're gathering that, I would like to speak to
17 the parties at sidebar just as to how to address the jury about
18 the followup from the break yesterday.
19 (Continued on next page)
20 (Page 2037 SEALED)
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016225
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document