DOJ-OGR-00011547.jpg
601 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
3
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (sentencing hearing)
File Size:
601 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, likely the Ghislaine Maxwell sentencing) dated July 22, 2022. The defense argues that money transfers for a helicopter and Larry Visoski holding car assets for Epstein do not prove the defendant's continued involvement in the conspiracy. Prosecutor Ms. Moe counters that the financial evidence was offered to refute the claim that the defendant had 'moved on' from her association with Epstein.
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Larry Visoski | Pilot / Employee |
Mentioned in testimony as someone who kept assets (cars) in his name for Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Deceased Financier / Co-conspirator |
Referenced as 'Mr. Epstein'; Visoski held assets for him; defendant accused of remaining a close associate of his.
|
| Ms. Moe | Prosecutor (Government) |
Argues that financial evidence proves the defendant remained associated with Epstein.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, asking questions about evidence and guidelines.
|
| Mr. Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Responds to the Judge ('Yes, your Honor').
|
| The Defendant | Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell) |
Referred to as 'she' and 'her'; subject of the argument regarding whether she 'moved on' from Epstein.
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in the footer.
|
|
| The Government |
Referenced by the defense and the Court.
|
|
| DOJ |
Referenced in Bates stamp DOJ-OGR-00011547.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-07-22
Court Hearing (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE)
Southern District of New York (Implied)
Relationships (2)
Testimony that Visoski 'kept assets of cars in his name for Mr. Epstein'.
Government argues evidence established she 'remained a close associate for many years'.
Key Quotes (3)
"We heard testimony from Larry Visoski that he often kept assets of cars in his name for Mr. Epstein."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011547.jpg
Quote #1
"That doesn't make Larry Visoski a participant in the criminal endeavors."Source
DOJ-OGR-00011547.jpg
Quote #2
"contrary to the assertion that the defendant had moved on and was no longer associated with Epstein, the trial evidence established that she remained a close associate for many years"Source
DOJ-OGR-00011547.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,523 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 737 Filed 07/22/22 Page 28 of 101 28
M6SQmax1
M6SQmax1
1 your Honor. If the Court remembers the record evidence, there
2 was some evidence of money moving, but it was to buy a
3 helicopter that was not for her. We heard testimony from Larry
4 Visoski that he often kept assets of cars in his name for
5 Mr. Epstein. That doesn't make Larry Visoski a participant in
6 the criminal endeavors. I think it's a stretch for the
7 government to point to that as some sort of evidence of
8 continued involvement or continued profit after the end date of
9 the conspiracy. I just wanted to make that one point, your
10 Honor.
11 THE COURT: Anything on that, Ms. Moe?
12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the financial
13 transaction, we offered that along with other evidence to
14 refute the claim that the defendant had moved on, which, as we
15 noted, is an expression that has no legal meaning. And so
16 contrary to the assertion that the defendant had moved on and
17 was no longer associated with Epstein, the trial evidence
18 established that she remained a close associate for many years,
19 and that is the purpose for which we offered that evidence.
20 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
21 I do want to address -- do you have other -- I want to
22 ask about 3(b)(1).
23 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
24 THE COURT: I think it's for the government. So as I
25 see the question here, the guidelines require me to find that
2 was some evidence of money moving, but it was to buy a
3 helicopter that was not for her. We heard testimony from Larry
4 Visoski that he often kept assets of cars in his name for
5 Mr. Epstein. That doesn't make Larry Visoski a participant in
6 the criminal endeavors. I think it's a stretch for the
7 government to point to that as some sort of evidence of
8 continued involvement or continued profit after the end date of
9 the conspiracy. I just wanted to make that one point, your
10 Honor.
11 THE COURT: Anything on that, Ms. Moe?
12 MS. MOE: Your Honor, with respect to the financial
13 transaction, we offered that along with other evidence to
14 refute the claim that the defendant had moved on, which, as we
15 noted, is an expression that has no legal meaning. And so
16 contrary to the assertion that the defendant had moved on and
17 was no longer associated with Epstein, the trial evidence
18 established that she remained a close associate for many years,
19 and that is the purpose for which we offered that evidence.
20 THE COURT: Understood. Thank you.
21 I do want to address -- do you have other -- I want to
22 ask about 3(b)(1).
23 MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
24 THE COURT: I think it's for the government. So as I
25 see the question here, the guidelines require me to find that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. •
•
•
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011547
•
•
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00011547
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document