DOJ-OGR-00017200.jpg
641 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
641 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript of a rebuttal argument given by Ms. Comey. She argues that the witnesses—Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie—have no financial motive to lie, as their civil cases are settled and the victim compensation fund they were paid from is finished. Ms. Comey refutes the defense's implication of a financial incentive for Jane by clarifying that a conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor occurred in 2021, long after Jane had already received her financial award.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Speaker (likely prosecutor/lawyer) |
Delivering the rebuttal argument in a trial.
|
| Maxwell | Subject of testimony |
Mentioned as being exactly who Alessi described.
|
| Alessi | Witness or source of information |
Stated who Maxwell was and is described as having no reason to lie.
|
| Jane | Witness |
Mentioned as one of four women who have no motive to lie and no financial stake in the trial's outcome. Her lawyer's ...
|
| Kate | Witness |
Mentioned as one of four women who have no motive to lie and no financial stake in the trial's outcome.
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned as one of four women who have no motive to lie and no financial stake in the trial's outcome.
|
| Annie | Witness |
Mentioned as one of four women who have no motive to lie and no financial stake in the trial's outcome.
|
| Jane's lawyer | Lawyer |
Subject of a stipulation; had a conversation with a prosecutor in 2021 about Jane testifying.
|
| prosecutor | Prosecutor |
Had a conversation with Jane's lawyer in 2021.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Appears in the footer of the document, likely the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2021
A conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor regarding Jane's testimony.
Relationships (3)
The document refers to "Jane's lawyer" and a conversation he had regarding her case.
The document describes a conversation that occurred between them in 2021 regarding Jane's testimony.
Key Quotes (2)
"You heard Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie each tell you unequivocally they have no financial stake in the outcome of this trial."Source
— Ms. Comey (referencing testimony of Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie)
(Used to argue that the witnesses have no financial motive to lie.)
DOJ-OGR-00017200.jpg
Quote #1
"This verdict will have zero impact on the money they received."Source
— Ms. Comey
(Concluding the argument that the witnesses have no financial incentive to perjure themselves.)
DOJ-OGR-00017200.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,651 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 179 of 257
LCKVMAX8 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey
LCKVMAX8 Rebuttal - Ms. Comey
1 Maxwell was exactly who Alessi said she was. And just like the
2 ex-boyfriends, Alessi has no reason to lie to you.
3 Second. Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie have no motive
4 to lie at this trial. The defense's only explanation for why
5 they would perjure themselves on that stand is money. But the
6 facts just do not support that. Remember, the victim
7 compensation fund is finished; the civil cases are done.
8 There's nothing pending. These women have already received
9 millions of dollars. They are not getting a penny more.
10 Now, the defense tried to point you to this
11 stipulation about Jane's lawyer. I'd encourage you to take a
12 look at it. Look at the whole stipulation. You'll see it
13 doesn't change anything I've said. Jane's lawyer told the
14 prosecutor that he remembered telling Jane that testifying
15 would be the morally right thing to do and that it could help
16 her case. But to be clear, that conversation with that
17 prosecutor occurred in 2021, long after Jane's civil case was
18 settled, long after she already received her award from the
19 fund. So there was no case to help. Whatever the lawyer meant
20 by that, there is absolutely no evidence that Jane had any
21 financial incentive to testify at this trial. There's no money
22 to be had. You heard Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie each tell
23 you unequivocally they have no financial stake in the outcome
24 of this trial. This verdict will have zero impact on the money
25 they received.
2 ex-boyfriends, Alessi has no reason to lie to you.
3 Second. Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie have no motive
4 to lie at this trial. The defense's only explanation for why
5 they would perjure themselves on that stand is money. But the
6 facts just do not support that. Remember, the victim
7 compensation fund is finished; the civil cases are done.
8 There's nothing pending. These women have already received
9 millions of dollars. They are not getting a penny more.
10 Now, the defense tried to point you to this
11 stipulation about Jane's lawyer. I'd encourage you to take a
12 look at it. Look at the whole stipulation. You'll see it
13 doesn't change anything I've said. Jane's lawyer told the
14 prosecutor that he remembered telling Jane that testifying
15 would be the morally right thing to do and that it could help
16 her case. But to be clear, that conversation with that
17 prosecutor occurred in 2021, long after Jane's civil case was
18 settled, long after she already received her award from the
19 fund. So there was no case to help. Whatever the lawyer meant
20 by that, there is absolutely no evidence that Jane had any
21 financial incentive to testify at this trial. There's no money
22 to be had. You heard Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie each tell
23 you unequivocally they have no financial stake in the outcome
24 of this trial. This verdict will have zero impact on the money
25 they received.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017200
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document