January 01, 2021
A conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor regarding Jane's testimony.
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| prosecutor | person | 8 | View Entity |
| Jane's lawyer | person | 10 | View Entity |
DOJ-OGR-00017200.jpg
This document is a page from a court transcript of a rebuttal argument given by Ms. Comey. She argues that the witnesses—Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie—have no financial motive to lie, as their civil cases are settled and the victim compensation fund they were paid from is finished. Ms. Comey refutes the defense's implication of a financial incentive for Jane by clarifying that a conversation between Jane's lawyer and a prosecutor occurred in 2021, long after Jane had already received her financial award.
Events with shared participants
Plea conference where the decision to seal the federal non-prosecution agreement was made.
2008-01-01 • Palm Beach County Court
The document discusses the nature of plea negotiations between a defendant and a prosecutor, specifically whether they can bind other districts.
Date unknown
Jane participated in the Epstein Victims' Compensation Program, where she signed a claim form prepared with her lawyer's assistance and attested to its accuracy.
Date unknown
Brune & Richard lawyers received a copy of juror Conrad's letter to the prosecutor.
2011-06-20
Plea negotiations in Commonwealth v. Zuber
1976-01-01 • Pennsylvania
Lenny Bruce's trial (implied by jury mention)
Date unknown • Chicago
Direct examination testimony of witness Loftus in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom (Southern District)
Mary brought in front of the grand jury without briefing.
0028-06-01 • Court/Grand Jury Room
Evidentiary hearing regarding the scope of the plea agreement.
Date unknown • District Court
Grand Jury Testimony regarding victim identification charts.
Date unknown • Unknown (Grand Jury Room)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event