DOJ-OGR-00010028.jpg
426 KB
Extraction Summary
9
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
5
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
426 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript showing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on a conversation at Foley Square and whether a 'Ms. Edelstein' inquired about a 'suspension opinion'. The transcript captures legal objections from attorneys Mr. Schectman and Ms. Davis regarding the accuracy of a date (May 12th) and leading questions, with the judge clarifying the nature of the objection.
People (9)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
Being questioned under direct examination.
|
| MR. SCHECTMAN | Attorney |
Attorney present in court, asks for a date and later objects to a question.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Presiding over the court proceedings, addressed by the attorneys.
|
| Ms. Edelstein |
Subject of a question regarding whether she asked to see a suspension opinion.
|
|
| Ms. Trzaskoma |
Mentioned as having told Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about a suspension issue on May 12th.
|
|
| Mr. Schoeman |
Recipient of information from Ms. Trzaskoma about a suspension issue.
|
|
| Mr. Berke |
Recipient of information from Ms. Trzaskoma about a suspension issue.
|
|
| MS. DAVIS | Attorney |
Attorney present in court, responds to an objection by citing rule 611(c).
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Clarifies the nature of Mr. Schectman's objection.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript page as the court reporting service.
|
| The Court | government agency |
The judicial body presiding over the case.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Direct examination of witness Brune by an unnamed questioner, with objections from Mr. Schectman and Ms. Davis, and clarification from the Court.
Courtroom
Unknown year-05-12
Ms. Trzaskoma allegedly informed Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about a suspension issue.
Unknown
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of a conversation being discussed in the testimony.
|
Relationships (5)
Both are acting as attorneys in the same court proceeding, on opposing sides of an objection.
Mr. Schectman addresses the Court as 'Judge' and makes a legal objection, which the Court rules on.
Ms. Davis addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' and presents a legal argument.
Ms. Trzaskoma is alleged to have communicated with Mr. Schoeman about a 'suspension issue'.
Ms. Trzaskoma is alleged to have communicated with Mr. Berke about a 'suspension issue'.
Key Quotes (4)
"Judge, it would be helpful if we had a date."Source
— MR. SCHECTMAN
(Requesting a specific date for the conversation being discussed.)
DOJ-OGR-00010028.jpg
Quote #1
"Judge, I object. I don't think the date is accurate. I think it's leading. I mean, I don't object to much leading, but the date's not accurate."Source
— MR. SCHECTMAN
(Objecting to a question posed to the witness based on an allegedly inaccurate date and its leading nature.)
DOJ-OGR-00010028.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor if I might, 611(c) allows us to lead with a witness identified as an adverse party."Source
— MS. DAVIS
(Responding to Mr. Schectman's objection by citing a legal rule.)
DOJ-OGR-00010028.jpg
Quote #3
"He's not objecting to leading. He's objecting to leading with an erroneous assumption or statement."Source
— THE COURT
(Clarifying the basis of Mr. Schectman's objection.)
DOJ-OGR-00010028.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,369 characters)
Case 2:20-cv-00838-DAE-N Document 164-20 Filed 03/23/22 Page 606 of 1303
A-5745
A-5745
288
C2GFDAU1
Brune - direct
1 found prior to voir dire?
2 A. Now we're back to the conversation on Foley Square?
3 Q. I'm just asking a question, I'm not putting a date on it.
4 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, it would be helpful if we had a
5 date.
6 Q. I don't know the answer so I'm going to ask the broad
7 question.
8 A. Okay.
9 Q. At the time, around the time before the verdict came in --
10 A. Okay, that's helpful.
11 Q. Do you know whether Ms. Edelstein asked to see the
12 suspension opinion?
13 A. I don't think that she did, but I don't know one way or the
14 other. She certainly didn't in the conversation on Foley
15 Square that we've been talking about.
16 Q. You do know, don't you, though, that on May 12th, Ms.
17 Trzaskoma told not the Court about the suspension issue but
18 Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke, correct?
19 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, I object. I don't think the
20 date is accurate. I think it's leading. I mean, I don't
21 object to much leading, but the date's not accurate.
22 MS. DAVIS: Your Honor if I might, 611(c) allows us to
23 lead with a witness identified as an adverse party.
24 THE COURT: He's not objecting to leading. He's
25 objecting to leading with an erroneous assumption or statement.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
Brune - direct
1 found prior to voir dire?
2 A. Now we're back to the conversation on Foley Square?
3 Q. I'm just asking a question, I'm not putting a date on it.
4 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, it would be helpful if we had a
5 date.
6 Q. I don't know the answer so I'm going to ask the broad
7 question.
8 A. Okay.
9 Q. At the time, around the time before the verdict came in --
10 A. Okay, that's helpful.
11 Q. Do you know whether Ms. Edelstein asked to see the
12 suspension opinion?
13 A. I don't think that she did, but I don't know one way or the
14 other. She certainly didn't in the conversation on Foley
15 Square that we've been talking about.
16 Q. You do know, don't you, though, that on May 12th, Ms.
17 Trzaskoma told not the Court about the suspension issue but
18 Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke, correct?
19 MR. SCHECTMAN: Judge, I object. I don't think the
20 date is accurate. I think it's leading. I mean, I don't
21 object to much leading, but the date's not accurate.
22 MS. DAVIS: Your Honor if I might, 611(c) allows us to
23 lead with a witness identified as an adverse party.
24 THE COURT: He's not objecting to leading. He's
25 objecting to leading with an erroneous assumption or statement.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010028
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document