Trove
Sign In Sign Up

Mr. Berke

Person
Mentions
4
Relationships
3
Events
3
Documents
2
Search

Relationship Network

Loading... nodes
Interactive Network: Click nodes or edges to highlight connections and view details with action buttons. Drag nodes to reposition. Node size indicates connection count. Line color shows relationship strength: red (8-10), orange (6-7), yellow (4-5), gray (weak). Use legend and help buttons in the graph for more guidance.

Event Timeline

Interactive Timeline: Hover over events to see details. Events are arranged chronologically and alternate between top and bottom for better visibility.
3 total relationships
Connected Entity Relationship Type
Strength (mentions)
Documents Actions
person Ms. Trzaskoma
Unknown
5
1
View
person Unnamed Questioner
Professional
5
1
View
person Ms. Trzaskoma
Legal representative
5
1
View
Date Event Type Description Location Actions
N/A Cross-examination Mr. Berke is questioned under oath about an attorney's ethical obligations regarding juror miscon... Court View
2025-11-05 Communication Ms. Trzaskoma allegedly informed Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about a suspension issue. Unknown View
0012-05-01 N/A Alleged communication regarding a suspension issue involving Ms. Trzaskoma, Mr. Schoeman, and Mr.... Unspecified View

DOJ-OGR-00010028.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript showing the direct examination of a witness named Brune. The questioning focuses on a conversation at Foley Square and whether a 'Ms. Edelstein' inquired about a 'suspension opinion'. The transcript captures legal objections from attorneys Mr. Schectman and Ms. Davis regarding the accuracy of a date (May 12th) and leading questions, with the judge clarifying the nature of the objection.

Legal document
2025-11-20
Analysis Source

DOJ-OGR-00009349.jpg

This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE) involving the direct examination of a witness named Brune by Ms. Davis. The testimony centers on a conversation at Foley Square and whether a Ms. Edelstein asked to see a 'suspension opinion.' There is a legal dispute regarding a question about Ms. Trzaskoma informing Mr. Schoeman and Mr. Berke about a suspension issue on May 12th, with the defense objecting to the accuracy of the date and the prosecution arguing they are permitted to lead an adverse witness.

Court transcript
2025-11-20
Analysis Source
Total Received
$0.00
0 transactions
Total Paid
$0.00
0 transactions
Net Flow
$0.00
0 total transactions
No financial transactions found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.
As Sender
0
As Recipient
0
Total
0
No communications found for this entity. Entity linking may need to be improved.

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity

Back to Search