DOJ-OGR-00004907.jpg
1.57 MB
Extraction Summary
4
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript / legal filing exhibit
File Size:
1.57 MB
Summary
This document is a page from a sealed court transcript filed on July 2, 2021, as part of the criminal case against Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The transcript captures a dialogue between the Court and attorney Mr. Rossmiller regarding the definition of confidential materials involving plaintiff Virginia Roberts and a subpoena issued to the law firm Boies Schiller. The discussion focuses on privilege, privacy interests, and a proposed order submitted to Judge Sweet.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Virginia Roberts | Plaintiff |
Mentioned as having privacy interests implicated by the materials.
|
| Mr. Rossmiller | Attorney |
Speaking to the court regarding confidential materials and subpoenas.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, questioning Rossmiller.
|
| Judge Sweet | Judge |
Mentioned as the recipient of a proposed order (likely Robert W. Sweet).
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Boies Schiller |
Law firm subject to a subpoena.
|
|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service listed in the footer.
|
|
| Department of Justice (DOJ) |
Implied by footer stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.
|
|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York, implied by footer stamp.
|
Timeline (2 events)
Unknown (Transcript Date)
Court hearing regarding the definition of confidential materials and subpoena compliance.
Courtroom (Presumably SDNY)
Relationships (2)
Boies Schiller is responding to a subpoena regarding materials related to plaintiff Virginia Roberts.
Rossmiller confirms providing a proposed order to Judge Sweet.
Key Quotes (4)
"materials' as 'information that is confidential and implicates common law and statutory privacy interests of plaintiff Virginia Roberts.'"Source
DOJ-OGR-00004907.jpg
Quote #1
"I have absolutely no idea what that means, and you don't either, and none of us does."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004907.jpg
Quote #2
"Boies Schiller has the ability to say that they will not produce certain materials because they are privileged..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004907.jpg
Quote #3
"I am not aware that they have identified any materials as confidential that they would withhold..."Source
DOJ-OGR-00004907.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,463 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 311-1 Filed 07/02/21 Page 14 of 23
13
Xj3q1gra SEALED
1 materials" as "information that is confidential and implicates
2 common law and statutory privacy interests of plaintiff
3 Virginia Roberts."
4 THE COURT: I have absolutely no idea what that means,
5 and you don't either, and none of us does.
6 MR. ROSSMILLER: I don't, your Honor, but I think we
7 argued in our submission that it, at least on its face, does
8 not implicate the type of materials that are confidential
9 business materials, trade secrets --
10 THE COURT: Ordinarily the subject of --
11 MR. ROSSMILLER: -- ordinarily the subject of the
12 considerations developed in some of the cases that we cited.
13 THE COURT: Okay.
14 MR. ROSSMILLER: And I should also say that in
15 responding to the subpoena, Boies Schiller has the ability to
16 say that they will not produce certain materials because they
17 are privileged, because they believe that there is some larger
18 overarching confidentiality issue, at which point we would be
19 in a different posture. I am not aware that they have
20 identified any materials as confidential that they would
21 withhold, but I do note that we would not ask for and would not
22 expect to receive privileged materials.
23 THE COURT: Okay. Did you provide Judge Sweet with a
24 proposed order?
25 MR. ROSSMILLER: We did, yes, your Honor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
SDNY_GM_00000865
DOJ-OGR-00004907
13
Xj3q1gra SEALED
1 materials" as "information that is confidential and implicates
2 common law and statutory privacy interests of plaintiff
3 Virginia Roberts."
4 THE COURT: I have absolutely no idea what that means,
5 and you don't either, and none of us does.
6 MR. ROSSMILLER: I don't, your Honor, but I think we
7 argued in our submission that it, at least on its face, does
8 not implicate the type of materials that are confidential
9 business materials, trade secrets --
10 THE COURT: Ordinarily the subject of --
11 MR. ROSSMILLER: -- ordinarily the subject of the
12 considerations developed in some of the cases that we cited.
13 THE COURT: Okay.
14 MR. ROSSMILLER: And I should also say that in
15 responding to the subpoena, Boies Schiller has the ability to
16 say that they will not produce certain materials because they
17 are privileged, because they believe that there is some larger
18 overarching confidentiality issue, at which point we would be
19 in a different posture. I am not aware that they have
20 identified any materials as confidential that they would
21 withhold, but I do note that we would not ask for and would not
22 expect to receive privileged materials.
23 THE COURT: Okay. Did you provide Judge Sweet with a
24 proposed order?
25 MR. ROSSMILLER: We did, yes, your Honor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
SDNY_GM_00000865
DOJ-OGR-00004907
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document