DOJ-OGR-00010017.jpg
447 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
447 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Brune. Brune testifies that they had no concerns about the behavior of a particular juror and recounts the circumstances surrounding a note sent by Juror No. 1 on May 10th. The witness recalls that Judge Pauley disclosed the note to the court only after summations were complete, believing it would have been unfair to do so in the middle of them.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Brune | Witness |
The individual being questioned in a direct examination.
|
| Juror No. 1 | Juror |
Mentioned as having sent a note to the court, marked as Court Exhibit 3, on May 10th.
|
| Judge Pauley | Judge |
Mentioned as the judge who disclosed the note from Juror No. 1 after counsel had summed up.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Court | Government agency |
The legal body presiding over the trial, to which concerns about jurors could be raised and notes could be sent.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
The court reporting agency that transcribed the proceeding.
|
Timeline (3 events)
A trial proceeding where a witness (Brune) is being questioned about a juror's behavior and a note sent by the juror.
Court
Judge Pauley disclosed and read a note from Juror No. 1 after summations were completed.
Court
Relationships (2)
Brune is a witness testifying in a trial presided over by Judge Pauley.
Brune, as a participant in the trial, observed the behavior of Juror No. 1.
Key Quotes (2)
"To the contrary, she seemed to be who she had presented herself to be."Source
— Brune
(Responding to a question about whether a juror's demeanor or behavior caused any concern during the trial.)
DOJ-OGR-00010017.jpg
Quote #1
"my recollection was that he did that because he didn't think it was fair to provide the note in the middle of summations."Source
— Brune
(Explaining the witness's understanding of why Judge Pauley waited until after summations to disclose the note from Juror No. 1.)
DOJ-OGR-00010017.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,536 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00068-DAE-Nm Document 1643-20 Filed 03/24/22 Page 494 of 3030
A-5734
A-5734
277
C2GFDAU1
Brune - direct
1 A. I noticed that, yes.
2 Q. And you saw nothing that caused you concern about her
3 demeanor or behavior during the trial, correct?
4 A. No. To the contrary, she seemed to be who she had
5 presented herself to be.
6 Q. You in fact did not raise any concerns with the Court at
7 any point during trial about her behavior as a juror?
8 A. No, I saw no cause for concern.
9 Q. Now, you were also present for the process leading up to
10 jury deliberations, correct?
11 A. When you say the process, I'm sorry.
12 Q. I'll withdraw the question. You were present in court when
13 Juror No. 1 sent I think a note, I think it might have been
14 marked as Court Exhibit 3, prior to the start of jury
15 deliberations, correct?
16 A. I was present in court, although I don't think I knew at
17 the point what -- because I think what happened, I may be
18 getting it a little wrong, but on May 10th, judging from the
19 date on the note, she sent the note and then I recollect that
20 Judge Pauley disclosed the note after all counsel had summed up
21 and my recollection was that he did that because he didn't
22 think it was fair to provide the note in the middle of
23 summations. So he must have received it somewhere along the
24 middle of the summations.
25 Q. And you were present when the judge read the note to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
C2GFDAU1
Brune - direct
1 A. I noticed that, yes.
2 Q. And you saw nothing that caused you concern about her
3 demeanor or behavior during the trial, correct?
4 A. No. To the contrary, she seemed to be who she had
5 presented herself to be.
6 Q. You in fact did not raise any concerns with the Court at
7 any point during trial about her behavior as a juror?
8 A. No, I saw no cause for concern.
9 Q. Now, you were also present for the process leading up to
10 jury deliberations, correct?
11 A. When you say the process, I'm sorry.
12 Q. I'll withdraw the question. You were present in court when
13 Juror No. 1 sent I think a note, I think it might have been
14 marked as Court Exhibit 3, prior to the start of jury
15 deliberations, correct?
16 A. I was present in court, although I don't think I knew at
17 the point what -- because I think what happened, I may be
18 getting it a little wrong, but on May 10th, judging from the
19 date on the note, she sent the note and then I recollect that
20 Judge Pauley disclosed the note after all counsel had summed up
21 and my recollection was that he did that because he didn't
22 think it was fair to provide the note in the middle of
23 summations. So he must have received it somewhere along the
24 middle of the summations.
25 Q. And you were present when the judge read the note to
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010017
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document