Event Details
Date Unknown
Description
A trial proceeding where a witness (Brune) is being questioned about a juror's behavior and a note sent by the juror.
Participants (4)
| Name | Type | Mentions | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unnamed Counsel | person | 10 | View Entity |
| Judge Pauley | person | 146 | View Entity |
| Juror No. 1 | person | 133 | View Entity |
| Brune | person | 216 | View Entity |
Source Documents (1)
DOJ-OGR-00010017.jpg
This document is a court transcript from a direct examination of a witness named Brune. Brune testifies that they had no concerns about the behavior of a particular juror and recounts the circumstances surrounding a note sent by Juror No. 1 on May 10th. The witness recalls that Judge Pauley disclosed the note to the court only after summations were complete, believing it would have been unfair to do so in the middle of them.
Related Events
Events with shared participants
A hearing where the witness made statements to Judge Pauley that are the subject of the current examination.
2011-12-20 • Courtroom
Witness Conrad swore to Judge Pauley on March 2nd that she lived in Bronxville.
Date unknown • Courtroom
Ms. Brune is giving testimony under direct examination.
Date unknown • Courtroom
A judge addresses a dispute between counsel regarding the scope of questioning during a witness's (Rocchio's) direct examination, ultimately sustaining an objection.
2022-08-10 • Courtroom in the Southern District
Judge Pauley explained the purpose of voir dire to the jury pool (venire), including Ms. Conrad.
Date unknown • Federal Court
A direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the legal team and paralegals involved in the 'Parma matter'.
Date unknown • Unspecified
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding the jury selection process (voir dire).
Date unknown
A past voir dire process is discussed, where the plan was for Judge Pauley to question potential juror Catherine M. Conrad to determine if she was the same person from a court opinion.
Date unknown
Judge Pauley attempted to determine 'The Answerer's' financial ability to hire a lawyer.
2011-12-20 • Court
Direct examination of a witness named Brune regarding their legal experience and a specific trial.
Date unknown • Courtroom (implied)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein event