This document is a court docket page from the case USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell (Case 22-1426) covering proceedings from November 10-11, 2021. It details a pretrial conference attended by Maxwell and her legal team, scheduling orders for voir dire (jury selection), and rulings on motions in limine regarding expert testimony on grooming. The document also outlines strict COVID-19 protocols for the courthouse and notes the denial of a defense motion to exclude specific expert testimony.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Federal Judge presiding over the case; signing orders.
|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of the criminal proceedings; present at pretrial conference.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor representing the USA.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor representing the USA.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor representing the USA.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Prosecutor representing the USA.
|
| Bobbi Sternheim | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Jeff Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Christian Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Laura Menninger | Defense Attorney |
Representing Ghislaine Maxwell; filing letters.
|
| Paula Speer | Court Reporter |
Recorded the pretrial conference.
|
| Sadie Herbert | Court Reporter |
Recorded the pretrial conference.
|
| Dr. Rocchio | Expert Witness |
Subject of a motion to exclude testimony regarding grooming.
|
"The Court therefore denies the Defense's motion to exclude Dr. Rocchio's testimony except as to the opinion that the presence of a third party can facilitate grooming."Source
"Defendant remains remanded."Source
"Anyone who fails to comply with the COVID-19 protocols that have been adopted by the Court will be required to leave the courthouse."Source
"The Court concludes that the proposed redactions and requests to seal certain exhibits are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,678 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document