DOJ-OGR-00000210.tif
38 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
9
Organizations
5
Locations
4
Events
4
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document excerpt / court filing
File Size:
38 KB
Summary
This document excerpt details various legal agreements and plea agreements across different U.S. judicial districts, outlining the scope and binding nature of these agreements between defendants and specific United States Attorney offices or divisions of the Department of Justice. It emphasizes which entities are bound by each agreement and which are not. The document includes specific case citations with dates, defendants, and ECF numbers.
Organizations (9)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana |
Party to an agreement
|
|
| Civil Rights Division |
Party to an agreement
|
|
| Fraud Section |
Party to an agreement with Defendant in Eastern District of Michigan
|
|
| Department of Justice |
Referenced as having divisions that may or may not be bound
|
|
| Sterling Bancorp, Inc. |
Defendant in United States v. Sterling Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
| Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice |
Party to Plea Agreement in District of Minnesota
|
|
| Detloff Marketing and Asset Management, Inc. |
Defendant in United States v. Detloff Marketing and Asset Management, Inc.
|
|
| United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri |
Office whose agreements are discussed
|
|
| DOJ-OGR |
Document identification prefix
|
Timeline (4 events)
April 4, 2023
Filing of ECF No. 127 in United States v. Malik, No. 4:24-cr-00010-HEA
Eastern District of Missouri
July 25, 2019
Filing of ECF No. 96 in United States v. Detloff Marketing and Asset Management, Inc., No. 18-cr-00197-PAM-HB
District of Minnesota
March 30, 2022
Filing of ECF No. 148 in United States v. Gibson, No. 1:20-cr-00094
Southern District of Indiana
May 18, 2023
Filing of ECF No. 12 in United States v. Sterling Bancorp, Inc., No. 2:23-cr-20174-LVP-DRG
Eastern District of Michigan
Locations (5)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction for United States v. Gibson
|
|
|
Jurisdiction for United States v. Sterling Bancorp, Inc.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction for United States v. Detloff Marketing and Asset Management, Inc.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction for United States v. Malik
|
|
|
Jurisdiction for an agreement involving 'The Defendants'
|
Relationships (4)
Agreement between the Defendant, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, and the Civil Rights Division
Agreement between the Defendant, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, and the Civil Rights Division
Agreement is between the Fraud Section and the Defendant
Plea Agreement binds only the Defendant and the Antitrust Division
Key Quotes (5)
""Agreement between the Defendant, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, and the Civil Rights Division and is binding only on the parties to the agreement, supersede all prior understandings, if any, whether written or oral, and cannot be modified except in writing, signed by all parties and filed with the Court, or on the record in open court.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000210.tif
Quote #1
""The Defendant understands and agrees that this Agreement is between the Fraud Section and the Defendant and does not bind any other division or section of the Department of Justice or any other federal, state, or local prosecuting, administrative, or regulatory authority.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000210.tif
Quote #2
""This Plea Agreement binds only the Defendant and the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice.... This Plea Agreement does not bind any other state or federal agency.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000210.tif
Quote #3
""This agreement does not, and is not intended to, bind any governmental office or agency other than the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri.""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000210.tif
Quote #4
""The Defendants understand and agree that this Agreement is among""Source
DOJ-OGR-00000210.tif
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,585 characters)
10
Agreement between the Defendant, the United States
Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, and the
Civil Rights Division and is binding only on the parties to
the agreement, supersede all prior understandings, if any,
whether written or oral, and cannot be modified except
in writing, signed by all parties and filed with the Court,
or on the record in open court." United States v. Gibson,
No. 1:20-cr-00094, ECF No. 148 (Mar. 30, 2022), at 17.
Eastern District of Michigan: "The Defendant
understands and agrees that this Agreement is between
the Fraud Section and the Defendant and does not
bind any other division or section of the Department of
Justice or any other federal, state, or local prosecuting,
administrative, or regulatory authority." United States
v. Sterling Bancorp, Inc., No. 2:23-cr-20174-LVP-DRG,
ECF No. 12 (May 18, 2023), at 4.
District of Minnesota: "This Plea Agreement
binds only the Defendant and the Antitrust Division of
the United States Department of Justice.... This Plea
Agreement does not bind any other state or federal
agency." United States v. Detloff Marketing and Asset
Management, Inc., No. 18-cr-00197-PAM-HB, ECF No.
96 (July 25, 2019), at 1.
Eastern District of Missouri: "This agreement does
not, and is not intended to, bind any governmental office
or agency other than the United States Attorney for the
Eastern District of Missouri." United States v. Malik,
No. 4:24-cr-00010-HEA, ECF No. 127 (Apr. 4, 2023), at 1.
Eastern District of New York: "The Defendants
understand and agree that this Agreement is among
DOJ-OGR-00000210
Agreement between the Defendant, the United States
Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana, and the
Civil Rights Division and is binding only on the parties to
the agreement, supersede all prior understandings, if any,
whether written or oral, and cannot be modified except
in writing, signed by all parties and filed with the Court,
or on the record in open court." United States v. Gibson,
No. 1:20-cr-00094, ECF No. 148 (Mar. 30, 2022), at 17.
Eastern District of Michigan: "The Defendant
understands and agrees that this Agreement is between
the Fraud Section and the Defendant and does not
bind any other division or section of the Department of
Justice or any other federal, state, or local prosecuting,
administrative, or regulatory authority." United States
v. Sterling Bancorp, Inc., No. 2:23-cr-20174-LVP-DRG,
ECF No. 12 (May 18, 2023), at 4.
District of Minnesota: "This Plea Agreement
binds only the Defendant and the Antitrust Division of
the United States Department of Justice.... This Plea
Agreement does not bind any other state or federal
agency." United States v. Detloff Marketing and Asset
Management, Inc., No. 18-cr-00197-PAM-HB, ECF No.
96 (July 25, 2019), at 1.
Eastern District of Missouri: "This agreement does
not, and is not intended to, bind any governmental office
or agency other than the United States Attorney for the
Eastern District of Missouri." United States v. Malik,
No. 4:24-cr-00010-HEA, ECF No. 127 (Apr. 4, 2023), at 1.
Eastern District of New York: "The Defendants
understand and agree that this Agreement is among
DOJ-OGR-00000210
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document