Civil Rights Division
OrganizationRelationship Network
Event Timeline
| Connected Entity | Relationship Type |
Strength
(mentions)
|
Documents | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
person
Senior
|
Sender recipient of notification |
1
|
1 | |
|
person
defendant
|
Party to agreement |
1
|
1 |
| Date | Event Type | Description | Location | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008-02-28 | N/A | USAO sent written notification to Civil Rights Division regarding Epstein investigation. | N/A | View |
EFTA00038168.pdf
This document is a chain of emails between the FBI (NY Field Office), DOJ, and attorney Gloria Allred's office (including her assistant Diane Aldrich) regarding the coordination of a victim meeting in Miami in November 2020. The correspondence addresses logistics, specifically a confusion regarding a client's identity due to the use of a stage name versus a legal name on different lists. It also includes requests for travel arrangements for a victim and her boyfriend, and discussions about secure telephone options for those unable to attend in person.
EFTA00038161.pdf
This document is an email chain from November 2, 2020, involving the FBI, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG), and the Civil Rights Division (CRT). The correspondence coordinates a 'Briefing Conference Call' regarding a 'Survivor_Briefing_Invitees_ODAG_Master_List.xlsx'. The emails discuss an RSVP tracking spreadsheet that includes travel information for attendees, likely related to a briefing for survivors of crimes related to the investigation.
EFTA00038046.pdf
This document is a calendar invitation for an 'Epstein Briefing Call' scheduled for October 16, 2020, involving the FBI, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General (ODAG), and the Civil Rights Division (CRT). The organizer notes that a Special Agent (SA) will likely join the call. The document includes dial-in numbers but has names and passcodes redacted.
EFTA00038025.pdf
An internal email dated October 20, 2020, coordinating a 'Epstein Briefing Check-In' call between various Department of Justice and FBI divisions, including the New York field office, the Office of the Deputy Attorney General, and the Civil Rights Division. The email provides dial-in information for the meeting.
EFTA00028723.pdf
This document is U.S. Department of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons Program Statement 1210.21, dated March 9, 2000, signed by Director Kathleen Hawk Sawyer. It establishes the policies and procedures for creating and operating Boards of Inquiry and Inquiry Teams to investigate incidents, specifically those involving employee misconduct or significant policy breaches. The document details the hierarchy for appointing these teams, the role of the Office of Internal Affairs, legal rights of employees during questioning (including Miranda and union rights), and the protocols for reporting and releasing findings.
DOJ-OGR-00000210.tif
This document excerpt details various legal agreements and plea agreements across different U.S. judicial districts, outlining the scope and binding nature of these agreements between defendants and specific United States Attorney offices or divisions of the Department of Justice. It emphasizes which entities are bound by each agreement and which are not. The document includes specific case citations with dates, defendants, and ECF numbers.
DOJ-OGR-00023141.tif
This document details the Department's review of the Epstein case from February to June 2008, initiated by Epstein's defense attorneys. It highlights internal discussions and notifications within the US justice system, including a February 28, 2008, notification from USAO Criminal Division Chief Senior to the Civil Rights Division regarding an ongoing child exploitation investigation involving Epstein. The notification, prepared by Villafaña and edited by Sloman, assessed the case as not being of "national interest" and anticipated charges under specific U.S. Code sections.
DOJ-OGR-00023301.tif
This document details investigative activities related to Jeffrey Epstein in late 2007 and 2008, focusing on Villafaña's role in preparing for a potential trial and federal charges, despite an existing Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It highlights efforts to identify new victims, revise prosecution strategies, and secure legal representation for victims, while also noting internal communications about the likelihood of charges and the ongoing nature of the investigation.
DOJ-OGR-00021465.jpg
This document details the continued federal investigation into Epstein after the signing of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). It outlines specific actions taken by prosecutor Villafaña, the FBI, and CEOS between late 2007 and mid-2008, such as interviewing new victims and preparing for trial, to demonstrate that the investigation remained active. The document asserts that communications to victims stating the case was 'currently under investigation' were accurate, despite potentially being misleading.
DOJ-OGR-00021303.jpg
This page from a DOJ OPR report details the internal Department review between February and June 2008 regarding the Epstein case. It highlights that while Epstein's defense sought a broad review of misconduct and NPA terms, the DOJ only reviewed federal jurisdiction issues. The document also records a 'stand down' order where Oosterbaan instructed a CEOS attorney to cease involvement, and details the formal notification sent by the USAO to the Civil Rights Division classifying the case as 'child prostitution' rather than a matter of 'national interest.'
DOJ-OGR-00021204.jpg
This document appears to be a page from a DOJ report (likely the OPR report) detailing the structure of Florida law enforcement and the background of U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta. It outlines the roles of the Palm Beach State Attorney and Sheriff's Office, Acosta's professional history, and his direct involvement in negotiating Jeffrey Epstein's controversial Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and subsequent state plea deal.
DOJ-OGR-00021203.jpg
This document is an organizational chart for the U.S. Department of Justice, depicting its structure for the period of 2006-2008. It outlines the hierarchy of leadership, starting with the Attorney General, and shows the various divisions, bureaus, and offices that fall under the Deputy Attorney General and Associate Attorney General. The chart provides a comprehensive overview of the department's components and their reporting relationships during that time.
DOJ-OGR-00021202.jpg
This document, a page from a legal filing, outlines the organizational structure of federal law enforcement in the Southern District of Florida during a specific period. It identifies key leadership at the Department of Justice, including Attorney General Michael Mukasey, and details the jurisdiction, staffing, and office locations of the U.S. Attorney's Office and the Federal Bureau of Investigation in the region. The text also notes that the FBI's West Palm Beach office handled the 'Epstein investigation'.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016521.jpg
This document is a page from a Minnesota Law Review article (Vol. 103, circa 2019) discussing the legal theory and international differences regarding private prosecutions versus public prosecutors. It specifically highlights the Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA) in the footnotes. The document appears to be from the files of David Schoen (Epstein's lawyer), as indicated by the footer, and was submitted to the House Oversight Committee as part of an investigation (Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016521).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016519.jpg
This document is a page from a law review article (103 Minn. L. Rev.) discussing mechanisms of prosecutorial accountability and the impact of resource constraints on charging decisions. It details three models for checking underenforcement: private prosecution authority, independent review of non-prosecution, and multiple public prosecution agencies, noting the U.S. preference for the third model. The page also includes extensive footnotes citing various legal scholars, articles, and cases related to prosecution failures and police bias.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382.jpg
This document is a page from a Department of Justice (DOJ) legislative analysis, identified by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012382'. The DOJ expresses its opposition to several subsections of proposed legislation (Sections 234 and 236) concerning child trafficking and the management of unaccompanied minors, arguing the proposals are burdensome, based on unreliable findings, and too restrictive. The department advocates for greater flexibility for agencies like DHS and HHS and opposes granting HHS access to sensitive law enforcement databases.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity