DOJ-OGR-00005241.jpg

662 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
6
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
1
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 662 KB
Summary

This is a letter from Ghislaine Maxwell's attorney, Bobbi C. Sternheim, to Judge Alison J. Nathan, dated October 15, 2021. Sternheim complains that the government's explanation for the severely delayed delivery of Maxwell's legal mail at the Metropolitan Detention Center (MDC) is inadequate and hinders Maxwell's ability to prepare for trial. The letter argues that the MDC is capable of timely delivery, citing the extensive resources used to monitor Maxwell, and criticizes the government's refusal to facilitate special delivery for evidence.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Bobbi C. Sternheim Attorney
Author of the letter, representing Ghislaine Maxwell.
Alison J. Nathan United States District Judge
Recipient of the letter, presiding over the case.
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
The subject of the letter, whose legal mail delivery was delayed.
Warden Warden
Mentioned as being unfamiliar with a sticker found on delayed mail at the MDC.
Unit Manager Unit Manager
Mentioned as being unfamiliar with a sticker found on delayed mail at the MDC.

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM law firm
The letterhead of the document, representing the sender.
United States Courthouse government building
The address for Judge Alison J. Nathan.
MDC correctional facility
The facility where Ghislaine Maxwell is being held and where the mail delivery issues occurred. Likely stands for Met...
BOP government agency
Mentioned as providing a version of an excuse for mail delays and for providing extra officers to the MDC. Likely sta...
U.S. Post Office government agency
Mentioned as the issuer of a type of bar code sticker found on the delayed mail.
The Government government agency
Refers to the prosecution in the case 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell'.

Timeline (3 events)

2021-10-02
Legal mail was placed by counsel in the legal mailbox at the MDC.
MDC
counsel
2021-10-07
Legal mail placed in the mailbox on October 2 was not discovered until October 7.
MDC
2021-10-15
The letter from Bobbi C. Sternheim to Judge Nathan was filed with the court.
United States Courthouse

Locations (3)

Location Context
The address of the Law Offices of Bobbi C. Sternheim.
The address of the United States Courthouse where Judge Nathan is located.
The city where the law office and courthouse are located.

Relationships (3)

Bobbi C. Sternheim attorney-client Ghislaine Maxwell
Sternheim is writing on behalf of 'Ms. Maxwell' regarding her 'legal mail' and ability to 'confer with counsel'.
Bobbi C. Sternheim professional Alison J. Nathan
Sternheim, an attorney, is formally addressing Judge Nathan, who is presiding over her client's case.
The Government adversarial (legal) Ghislaine Maxwell
The case is titled 'United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell', indicating the government is prosecuting Maxwell.

Key Quotes (1)

"my dog ate my homework."
Source
— Bobbi C. Sternheim (Used sarcastically to characterize the inadequacy of the excuse provided by the BOP for the delayed mail delivery.)
DOJ-OGR-00005241.jpg
Quote #1

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,806 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 352 Filed 10/15/21 Page 1 of 2
LAW OFFICES OF BOBBI C. STERNHEIM
212-243-1100 • Main
917-912-9698 • Cell
888-587-4737 • Fax
225 Broadway, Suite 715
New York, NY 10007
bcsternheim@mac.com
October 15, 2021
Honorable Alison J. Nathan
United States District Judge
United States Courthouse
40 Foley Square
New York, NY 10007
Re: United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell
20 Cr. 330 (AJN)
Dear Judge Nathan:
The Government’s letter concerning delayed delivery of Ghislaine Maxwell’s legal mail (Dkt. 350) merely parrots the MDC’s standard excuses, adding a BOP version of “my dog ate my homework.” The response is woefully inadequate and makes light of the MDC’s encroachment on Ms. Maxwell’s ability to prepare for trial and confer with counsel. It does not explain MDC’s failure to respond to counsel’s requests. It utterly fails to address the issue regarding the extremely late delivery of legal mail placed by counsel in the legal mailbox on October 2 but not discovered until October 7; nor the presence of a sticker with a bar code of the type issued by the U.S. Post Office and unfamiliar to the Warden and Unit Manager.
If it is not too burdensome for the MDC to rotate in extra officers from BOP facilities nationwide to overmanage and monitor Ms. Maxwell’s every move and every second she confers with counsel in the visiting room, the MDC should be able to deliver legal mail in a timely fashion. It is not surprising that the Government asserts that this case and the circumstances do not merit special expedited delivery. It dug its heels in when making it clear that it would not go out of its way to have the hard drive hand delivered to the MDC to ensure that Ms. Maxwell would receive it expeditiously, an accommodation it had previously made.
DOJ-OGR-00005241

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document