EFTA00019658.pdf

51.2 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 51.2 KB
Summary

An email chain from November 30, 2018, discussing various legal actions involving Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondents clarify the nature of a specific lawsuit in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, identifying it as a malicious prosecution suit filed against Epstein by an attorney who represented Epstein's victims. The discussion distinguishes this case from the victims' suit against the government regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). An attachment 'Plaintiff's_Motion_08_Civ_80736.pdf' is provided as an example of motion practice.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey Epstein Subject of discussion/Defendant
Mentioned as being sued for malicious prosecution by a lawyer; previously sued said lawyer.
Unnamed Attorney Plaintiff/Lawyer
Attorney who represented multiple victims; suing Epstein for malicious prosecution; previously sued by Epstein.
Unnamed Law Partner Associate of Attorney
Convicted of fraud related to an Epstein business.
Victims Plaintiffs/Clients
Represented by the unnamed attorney; filed suits against Epstein and the government.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
Palm Beach County Circuit Court
Venue for the lawsuit being discussed (Malicious Prosecution case).
DOJ
Department of Justice; mentioned in relation to a lawsuit regarding the NPA.

Timeline (2 events)

2018-12-04
Trial mentioned in email inquiry.
Unknown (question asks if State or Federal)
DOJ Epstein
Unknown
Lawsuit filed by attorney against Epstein for malicious prosecution.
Palm Beach County Circuit Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the court handling the malicious prosecution lawsuit.

Relationships (2)

Jeffrey Epstein Legal Adversaries Unnamed Attorney
Epstein previously sued the lawyer... The lawyer is now suing Epstein for malicious prosecution
Unnamed Attorney Professional Partners Unnamed Law Partner
lawyer's law partner was convicted of-- the fraud related to an Epstein business

Key Quotes (2)

"It's a lawsuit that an attorney who represented multiple victims filed against Epstein for malicious prosecution."
Source
EFTA00019658.pdf
Quote #1
"The lawyer is now suing Epstein for malicious prosecution, claiming that he wrongfully filed the old lawsuit in retaliation for representing Epstein's victims."
Source
EFTA00019658.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,500 characters)

From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: Epstein
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2018 14:38:55 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: Plaintiff's_Motion_08_Civ_80736.pdf
Here's the motion for summary judgment, for example.
-----Original Message-----
[REDACTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 9:33 AM
[REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Epstein
Thanks. And in either the state or federal action, has there been motion practice in which deposition transcripts have been filed? Motion for summary judgement, for example?
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 30, 2018, at 9:28 AM, [REDACTED] wrote:
>
> It's in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. It's not the lawsuit the victims filed against the government to invalidate the NPA. And it's not one of the suits the victims filed against Epstein. It's a lawsuit that an attorney who represented multiple victims filed against Epstein for malicious prosecution. Sort of a complicated background: previously Epstein sued the lawyer, claiming that the lawyer was involved in an unrelated fraud that the lawyer's law partner was convicted of-- the fraud related to an Epstein business. The lawyer is now suing Epstein for malicious prosecution, claiming that he wrongfully filed the old lawsuit in retaliation for representing Epstein's victims.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> [REDACTED]
> [REDACTED]
> [REDACTED]
> Subject: Epstein
>
> The December 4 trial - is that the one against DOJ or against Epstein? State or federal court?
>
> Sent from my iPhone
EFTA00019658

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document