PALM BEACH COUNTY
LocationRelationship Network
Epstein_Part_20_(Redacted).pdf
This document contains a plea agreement for Jeffrey E. Epstein, detailing charges of felony solicitation of prostitution and procuring a person under 18 for prostitution, along with his sentence and conditions. It also includes several handwritten message slips, some addressed to 'Mr. Epstein' or 'Jeffrey' and others to 'Mr. Maxwell' or 'Ghislaine Maxwell', containing phone numbers and short messages.
Epstein_Part_04_(Redacted).pdf
This document contains Sarah Kellen's cellphone usage records from September to October 2005, detailing calls made to and from various individuals including Jeffrey Epstein, Johanna Sjoberg, and a pilot named David Rodgers, with a note referencing a 'discovery of investigation & preparations to come to Palm Beach'. It also includes subscriber information for Sarah Kellen's Cingular Wireless account, showing Jeffrey Epstein as the financially liable party and their shared New York address.
085.pdf
A 2009 court order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County granting Jeffrey Epstein's motion for travel under strict probationary conditions. The order stipulates that travel is restricted to weekdays only (no weekends), limited to one overnight stay per trip, and requires approval 48 hours in advance from probation officer Carmon Sloan.
068.pdf
This document is a Mandate from the Fourth District Court of Appeal of Florida, dated September 18, 2009, regarding the case of Jeffrey Epstein v. State of Florida. The mandate follows an opinion issued on September 2, 2009, where the court affirmed the lower court's decision, treating Epstein's petition for writ of certiorari as a full appeal. The document lists numerous attorneys involved, including R. Alexander Acosta on the distribution list, and identifies Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. as an appellee alongside the State and a redacted party.
060.pdf
This document is a response filed by Palm Beach Newspapers, Inc. (The Palm Beach Post) to an emergency petition for writ of certiorari by Jeffrey Epstein. The Post argues that the trial court correctly unsealed a Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and its addendum related to Epstein's solicitation of minors, asserting that the documents were improperly sealed in the first instance and that no valid legal basis exists for their continued closure.
022.pdf
This document is a 'Order of Community Control I' from the 15th Judicial Circuit Court in Palm Beach County, Florida, adjudging Jeffrey E. Epstein guilty of procuring a person under the age of 18 for prostitution. The order, signed July 1, 2008 (effective June 30, 2008), sentences Epstein to six months in county jail followed by 12 months of community control (house arrest) with strict conditions including 24-hour electronic monitoring, sexual offender registration, and no unsupervised contact with minors. It also details various financial costs and standard supervision requirements.
014.pdf
This document is a plea agreement and sentencing order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County dated June 30, 2008. Jeffrey Epstein pleads guilty to Felony Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, receiving a sentence of 18 months in county detention followed by 12 months of community control. The order specifies strict conditions including house arrest at 358 El Brillo Way, sex offender registration, electronic monitoring, and a work-release arrangement allowing him to work at the 'Florida Science Foundation' in West Palm Beach.
001-02.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on September 17, 2010, in the Southern District of Florida for Case 9:10-cv-81111. The plaintiff, identified only as M.J., is suing Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen for 'Sexual exploitation of a minor' and demanding a jury trial. The plaintiff is represented by attorney Bradley J. Edwards.
LETTER.pdf
This document is a legal filing dated December 10, 2015, in which Jeffrey Epstein's attorney, Paul Morris, files a 'Notice to Invoke Discretionary Jurisdiction' with the Supreme Court of Florida. Epstein is appealing a decision made on November 12, 2015, by the District Court of Appeal (Fourth District) in the case of 'Bradley J. Edwards v. Jeffrey Epstein'. The attached opinion reveals that the lower court reversed a summary judgment that had favored Epstein, ruling that 'litigation privilege' does not bar Edwards' claim of malicious prosecution against Epstein.
056-01.pdf
A court order from the Southern District of Florida dated August 2009 in the case of Jane Doe II vs. Jeffrey Epstein and Sarah Kellen. Judge Kenneth A. Marra grants Sarah Kellen's request to adopt co-defendant Jeffrey Epstein's Motion to Dismiss and Reply as her own arguments in the case.
045.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Joinder' filed on June 8, 2009, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida, where Plaintiffs Jane Does 2-7 join a motion for a 'No-Contact Order' against Jeffrey Epstein. The filing alleges that Epstein's associate, Hayley Robson (who originally recruited the victims), has been harassing Jane Does 4 and 7 via text messages and in-person threats while claiming to be financially supported by Epstein. The plaintiffs argue that a court order is necessary to prevent Epstein from contacting or harassing victims through third parties like Robson.
001-01.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet filed on March 31, 2010, initiating a federal lawsuit by plaintiff 'C.L.' against Jeffrey Epstein. The cause of action is cited as sexual assault of a minor under 18 U.S.C §2255 and §2422. The document lists Epstein's legal team, including Jack Goldberger, Bruce Reinhart, and Robert Critton, and references numerous related federal cases.
EFTA00030202.pdf
An email chain from July 12, 2019, originating from an Assistant State Attorney in the Special Victim's Unit/Human Trafficking division of the 15th Judicial Circuit (Florida). The attorney is contacting an individual to solicit information regarding crimes by Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County and to identify victims willing to make statements to local law enforcement.
EFTA00029887.pdf
This document is a chain of internal emails from the U.S. Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) dated between July 31 and August 10, 2020. The correspondence focuses on preparing for discovery deadlines and potential arrests/indictments, specifically reviewing old files from the Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. The emails detail a search for evidence regarding Ghislaine Maxwell's status in the original Florida case, citing Grand Jury testimony where an agent described Maxwell meeting 'Jane Doe Number One' at Mar-a-Lago.
EFTA00029177.pdf
This document is an email chain between US Attorneys in the Southern District of New York dated July-August 2020. They are discussing the extent of Ghislaine Maxwell's involvement and mention in the original Southern District of Florida (SDFL) investigation, specifically reviewing grand jury testimony and search warrants. The text quotes an agent's testimony stating Maxwell met 'Jane Doe Number One' at Mar-a-Lago and introduced her to Epstein, after which she began providing massages.
EFTA00023966.pdf
This document is an email chain originating on July 12, 2019, shortly after Jeffrey Epstein's arrest, and forwarded internally within the US Attorney's Office (SDNY) in August 2020. The core message is from an Assistant State Attorney in the 15th Judicial Circuit (Palm Beach, FL) Special Victim's Unit, reaching out to a contact to express interest in pursuing local criminal charges for crimes occurring in Palm Beach County. The prosecutor asks to be put in contact with any victims willing to make statements to local law enforcement.
EFTA00019865.pdf
This document is an FBI Electronic Communication dated July 12, 2013, from the Miami field office. It details the submission of returns from administrative subpoenas into the Jeffrey Epstein case file. The evidence collected includes a birth certificate from the Palm Beach County Health Department and subscriber/toll information from Metro PCS, Bell South, AT&T, and T-Mobile USA, though the specific targets of these subpoenas are redacted.
EFTA00019658.pdf
An email chain from November 30, 2018, discussing various legal actions involving Jeffrey Epstein. The correspondents clarify the nature of a specific lawsuit in Palm Beach County Circuit Court, identifying it as a malicious prosecution suit filed against Epstein by an attorney who represented Epstein's victims. The discussion distinguishes this case from the victims' suit against the government regarding the Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA). An attachment 'Plaintiff's_Motion_08_Civ_80736.pdf' is provided as an example of motion practice.
EFTA00019345.pdf
This document is an email chain dated August 13, 2019, three days after Jeffrey Epstein's death. A Supervisory Staff Attorney at the Metropolitan Correctional Center (MCC) contacts the US Attorney's Office (USANYS) seeking records from Epstein's prior incarceration in Florida to assist with 'various investigations into the incident this past weekend.' The USANYS official replies that they have been 'walled off' from the investigation but provides a contact at the Palm Beach County Sheriff's Office Violent Crimes/Homicide division.
EFTA00016596.pdf
A formal response from the U.S. Attorney's Office (SDNY) to Jeffrey Epstein's defense team regarding discovery requests made in July and August 2019. The government rejects defense requests for broad access to files from other districts (FL, GA) and communications with victims as 'outlandishly overbroad' and a 'fishing expedition' to identify victims, while confirming it will comply with standard legal obligations (Rule 16, Brady). The letter asserts the SDNY investigation was independent of the previous Florida Non-Prosecution Agreement.
EFTA00016300.pdf
This document is an email chain spanning from July 2019 to August 2020. The core content is a July 12, 2019 email from an Assistant State Attorney in the 15th Judicial Circuit (Palm Beach, FL) to an unnamed recipient, expressing interest in information regarding crimes in Palm Beach County and seeking victims willing to make statements to local law enforcement. In August 2020, this chain was revived by USANYS personnel to identify a specific female individual discussed in the context of the investigation.
EFTA00016136.pdf
This document is a formal legal letter dated August 1, 2019, from Jeffrey Epstein's defense counsel (Steptoe & Johnson LLP) to the U.S. Attorney's Office for the SDNY. The letter requests extensive discovery materials including the specific identities of 'dozens of minor girls' and 'employees' mentioned in the indictment, flight logs ('use of Mr. Epstein's planes'), massage schedules, and visitor logs. The defense also requests 'Brady material' (exculpatory evidence), specifically seeking evidence to support defenses that Epstein believed victims were over 18, that victims deceived him about their age, and that payments were gifts rather than for sex acts.
EFTA00014619.pdf
An email chain from July 2019 originating with an Assistant State Attorney from the 15th Judicial Circuit's Special Victim's Unit in Florida. The attorney writes to an individual (Mr. [Redacted]) following a phone call, expressing interest in information that could lead to criminal charges regarding crimes in Palm Beach County and asking for contact with any victims willing to speak to law enforcement. The email is subsequently forwarded and acknowledged with a note about leaving a message.
EFTA00014185.pdf
Order from the U.S. District Court (Southern District of Florida) dated August 4, 2008, denying Jeffrey Epstein's motion to file a reply brief under seal in the case of Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. Judge Kenneth A. Marra ruled that the public interest in access to court records outweighed the U.S. Attorney's objections and the confidentiality clause in Epstein's agreement with the government, ordering the Clerk to unseal relevant docket entries.
EFTA00014175.pdf
An Assistant U.S. Attorney emails colleagues to report rumors that Epstein is falsely claiming cooperation in the Bernie Madoff case to secure a reduced sentence from the State Attorney's Office. The email also flags a suspicious court docket change removing 'Special Conditions' from Epstein's sentence and discusses the potential to investigate new allegations involving New York victims, noting interest from Madoff prosecutors in using evidence against Epstein.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity