DOJ-OGR-00021304.jpg
432 KB
Extraction Summary
10
People
4
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Doj internal review / court filing exhibit
File Size:
432 KB
Summary
This document page outlines the Department of Justice hierarchy in early 2008 and details a specific period of review by the Child Exploitation and Obscenity Section (CEOS). It recounts a February 21, 2008 conversation where CEOS Chief Andrew Oosterbaan told attorney Lefkowitz that CEOS could take a 'fresh and objective look' at the case rather than partnering with the USAO, provided that would help the process move forward.
People (10)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Alice Fisher | Assistant Attorney General |
Criminal Division hierarchy
|
| Mark Filip | Deputy Attorney General |
Office of the Deputy Attorney General hierarchy
|
| Andrew Lourie | Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General |
Criminal Division hierarchy (Until late Feb. 2008)
|
| John Roth | Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General |
Office of the Deputy Attorney General hierarchy
|
| Sigal Mandelker | Deputy Assistant Attorney General |
Criminal Division hierarchy
|
| Andrew Oosterbaan | Chief, CEOS |
Criminal Division hierarchy; spoke with Lefkowitz and victims
|
| Lefkowitz | Attorney (implied defense) |
Spoke with Oosterbaan about CEOS's role
|
| Villafaña | Recipient |
Recipient of email from Oosterbaan
|
| Sloman | Recipient |
Recipient of email from Oosterbaan
|
| Senior | Recipient |
Recipient of email from Oosterbaan
|
Organizations (4)
Relationships (2)
Spoke regarding case strategy and CEOS role
Org chart shows Oosterbaan reporting up to Mandelker
Key Quotes (2)
"I told [Lefkowitz] that all I want to do is help the process move forward, and if they think we best help the process by taking a fresh and objective look at the case and their arguments [then] that is what I want to do."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021304.jpg
Quote #1
"I told him that if that’s what they want – if that is what will help the process to move forward – then I don’t think it’s advisable for CEOS to partner with the USAO on the case."Source
DOJ-OGR-00021304.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,261 characters)
Case 22-1426, Document 77, 06/29/2023, 3536038, Page132 of 258
SA-130
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 130 of 348
SA-130
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 204-3 Filed 04/16/21 Page 130 of 348
Criminal Division
Office of the Deputy Attorney General
Office of the Deputy Attorney General
Alice Fisher
Assistant Attorney General
Assistant Attorney General
Mark Filip
Deputy Attorney General
Deputy Attorney General
Andrew Lourie *
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General
John Roth
Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General
Senior Associate Deputy Attorney General
Sigal Mandelker
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Deputy Assistant Attorney General
Andrew Oosterbaan
Chief, CEOS
Chief, CEOS
*Until late Feb. 2008
A. February – May 15, 2008: Review by CEOS and the Criminal Division
On February 21, 2008, soon after the CEOS Trial Attorney met with victims, Oosterbaan spoke with Lefkowitz about CEOS’s role. In a subsequent email to Villafaña, Sloman, and Senior, Oosterbaan explained:
I told [Lefkowitz] that all I want to do is help the process move forward, and if they think we best help the process by taking a fresh and objective look at the case and their arguments [then] that is what I want to do. I told him that if that’s what they want – if that is what will help the process to move forward – then I don’t think it’s advisable for CEOS to partner with the USAO on the case. He wants to think about that (and probably talk to his co-counsel about
104
DOJ-OGR-00021304
DOJ-OGR-00021304
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document