HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014099.jpg

1.59 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal court filing (objections and responses to requests for production)
File Size: 1.59 MB
Summary

This document is the first page of Alan Dershowitz's legal objections and responses to initial document production requests filed by plaintiffs Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell. The document was filed in the Circuit Court of Broward County, Florida (Case CACE 15-000072), but appears here as an exhibit in a federal case (Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM) docketed on March 24, 2015. It contains standard legal preliminary statements reserving rights regarding discovery and trial preparation.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Alan M. Dershowitz Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff
Submitting objections and responses to document requests.
Bradley J. Edwards Plaintiff / Counterclaim Defendant
One of the parties propounding the document requests.
Paul G. Cassell Plaintiff / Counterclaim Defendant
One of the parties propounding the document requests.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Circuit Court of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida
FLSD
Court where the document was docketed as an exhibit.
House Oversight Committee
Indicated by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (1 events)

2015-03-24
Document entered on FLSD Docket
Florida Southern District Court

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the state court case.

Relationships (2)

Alan M. Dershowitz Legal Adversaries Bradley J. Edwards
Listed as opposing parties (Defendant vs Plaintiff) in the case caption.
Alan M. Dershowitz Legal Adversaries Paul G. Cassell
Listed as opposing parties (Defendant vs Plaintiff) in the case caption.

Key Quotes (3)

"Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Alan M. Dershowitz (“Defendant”) submits the following objections and responses to the Plaintiffs’ Initial Request for Production"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014099.jpg
Quote #1
"Defendant has not completed his discovery or trial preparation in this matter."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014099.jpg
Quote #2
"The fact that a Document Request has been complied with in part shall not be construed as a waiver of all or any part of any objection that Defendant might or could make"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014099.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,584 characters)

Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 319-1 Entered on FLSD Docket 03/24/2015 Page 16 of 34
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE
SEVENTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA
CASE NO.: CACE 15-000072
EDWARDS, et al.,
Plaintiffs / Counterclaim Defendants,
v.
DERSHOWITZ,
Defendant / Counterclaim Plaintiff.
________________________________________/
DEFENDANT / COUNTERCLAIM PLAINTIFF ALAN M. DERSHOWITZ’S
OBJECTIONS AND RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS’
INITIAL REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION
Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff Alan M. Dershowitz (“Defendant”) submits the
following objections and responses to the Plaintiffs’ Initial Request for Production (“Document
Requests”) propounded by Plaintiffs/Counterclaim Defendants Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G.
Cassell (“Plaintiffs”).
PRELIMINARY STATEMENT
These responses and objections reflect the current state of Defendant’s knowledge
regarding the matters discussed herein. Defendant has not completed his discovery or trial
preparation in this matter. Accordingly, Defendant reserves the right to revise, correct, clarify,
supplement, or amend his objections and responses to reflect information hereafter discovered or
acquired. These responses and objections are provided without prejudice to the rights of
Defendant to use or rely upon subsequently discovered information or documents at any time,
including at trial. The fact that a Document Request has been complied with in part shall not be
construed as a waiver of all or any part of any objection that Defendant might or could make to
EXHIBIT A
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014099

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document