This document is a court docket report (Case 22-1426, SDNY) from November 2021 details legal proceedings in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. It lists various filings including orders on redactions to protect victim privacy, motions in limine regarding 'Accuser-3' and co-conspirator statements, and a dispute over an unauthenticated hearsay document (Exhibit 52). The docket reflects active pre-trial litigation between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach) and defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell) regarding the admissibility of evidence and pseudonym logistics.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ghislaine Maxwell | Defendant |
Subject of multiple orders, motions, and responses listed in the docket.
|
| Alison J. Nathan | Judge |
Signed orders regarding redactions and pseudonym logistics.
|
| Maurene Comey | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Author of Joint Letter regarding pseudonym logistics.
|
| Alison Moe | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Author of Joint Letter regarding pseudonym logistics.
|
| Lara Pomerantz | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Author of Joint Letter regarding pseudonym logistics.
|
| Andrew Rohrbach | AUSA (Assistant US Attorney) |
Author of Joint Letter; filed Motion in Limine and Reply Memorandum.
|
| Jeffrey Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Filed multiple responses and motions on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
|
| Christian Everdell | Defense Attorney |
Filed Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3.
|
| Accuser-3 | Alleged Victim/Witness |
Subject of a motion to exclude evidence.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SDNY |
Southern District of New York, the court jurisdiction.
|
|
| USA |
United States of America (Prosecution/Government).
|
|
| Second Circuit |
Appellate court cited in case law precedents.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Court location (New York).
|
"third party can facilitate grooming."Source
"narrowly tailored to protect the pre-trial privacy interests of alleged victims, anticipated witnesses, and non-parties."Source
"MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order."Source
"MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3."Source
"MOTION in Limine to Exclude Government Exhibit 52, an Unauthenticated Hearsay Document from Suspect Sources."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,903 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document