DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg

1.18 MB

Extraction Summary

9
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court docket report (sdny cm/ecf)
File Size: 1.18 MB
Summary

This document is a court docket report (Case 22-1426, SDNY) from November 2021 details legal proceedings in the US v. Ghislaine Maxwell case. It lists various filings including orders on redactions to protect victim privacy, motions in limine regarding 'Accuser-3' and co-conspirator statements, and a dispute over an unauthenticated hearsay document (Exhibit 52). The docket reflects active pre-trial litigation between the prosecution (AUSAs Comey, Moe, Pomerantz, Rohrbach) and defense counsel (Pagliuca, Everdell) regarding the admissibility of evidence and pseudonym logistics.

People (9)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Subject of multiple orders, motions, and responses listed in the docket.
Alison J. Nathan Judge
Signed orders regarding redactions and pseudonym logistics.
Maurene Comey AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Author of Joint Letter regarding pseudonym logistics.
Alison Moe AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Author of Joint Letter regarding pseudonym logistics.
Lara Pomerantz AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Author of Joint Letter regarding pseudonym logistics.
Andrew Rohrbach AUSA (Assistant US Attorney)
Author of Joint Letter; filed Motion in Limine and Reply Memorandum.
Jeffrey Pagliuca Defense Attorney
Filed multiple responses and motions on behalf of Ghislaine Maxwell.
Christian Everdell Defense Attorney
Filed Motion in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3.
Accuser-3 Alleged Victim/Witness
Subject of a motion to exclude evidence.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
SDNY
Southern District of New York, the court jurisdiction.
USA
United States of America (Prosecution/Government).
Second Circuit
Appellate court cited in case law precedents.

Timeline (3 events)

11/11/2021
Judge Nathan signs Order regarding redactions and sealing exhibits.
SDNY
Judge Alison J. Nathan
11/12/2021
Multiple motions in limine and responses entered into the docket.
SDNY
11/14/2021
Deadline for parties to submit lists referenced in the pseudonym logistics letter.
SDNY
USA Defense

Locations (1)

Location Context
Court location (New York).

Relationships (3)

Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Jeffrey Pagliuca
Pagliuca files multiple motions on behalf of Maxwell.
Ghislaine Maxwell Attorney-Client Christian Everdell
Everdell files motion on behalf of Maxwell.
Andrew Rohrbach Prosecutor USA
Rohrbach files motions on behalf of the USA.

Key Quotes (5)

"third party can facilitate grooming."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
Quote #1
"narrowly tailored to protect the pre-trial privacy interests of alleged victims, anticipated witnesses, and non-parties."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
Quote #2
"MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
Quote #3
"MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
Quote #4
"MOTION in Limine to Exclude Government Exhibit 52, an Unauthenticated Hearsay Document from Suspect Sources."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020688.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,903 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page70 of 208
A-66
2/22/23, 1:25 PM
SDNY CM/ECF NextGen Version 1.6
third party can facilitate grooming. This resolves docket number 386. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/11/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/11/2021 450 ORDER as to Ghislaine Maxwell: The Court is in receipt of the parties' proposed redactions in accordance with Dkt. No. 401. The Court concludes that the proposed redactions and requests to seal certain exhibits are consistent with the three-part test articulated by the Second Circuit in Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) and narrowly tailored to protect the pre-trial privacy interests of alleged victims, anticipated witnesses, and non-parties. See United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050-51 (2d Cir. 1995). The parties are hereby ORDERED to file the proposed redactions and accompanying exhibits on the public docket on or before November 12, 2021. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/11/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 436 MEMO ENDORSEMENT as to Ghislaine Maxwell on 432 JOINT LETTER by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell addressed to Judge Alison J. Nathan from AUSAs Maurene Comey, Alison Moe, Lara Pomerantz, and Andrew Rohrbach dated November 10, 2021 re: Pseudonym logistics. ENDORSEMENT: The parties are ORDERED to submit the lists referenced in this letter on or before November 14, 2021, in accordance with Dkt. No. 427. The parties may continue submitting proposed redactions in accordance with the procedures this Court has previously set. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge Alison J. Nathan on 11/11/2021) (lnl) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 438 MOTION in Limine . Document filed by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 439 RESPONSE to Motion by Ghislaine Maxwell re: 438 MOTION in Limine .. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (Filed Under Sealed), # 2 Exhibit B (Filed Under Seal), # 3 Exhibit C (Filed Under Sealed), # 4 Exhibit D (Filed Under Seal), # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F (Filed Under Seal), # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H (Filed Under Seal), # 9 Exhibit I (Filed Under Seal))(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 440 REPLY MEMORANDUM OF LAW in Support by USA as to Ghislaine Maxwell re: 438 MOTION in Limine . . (Rohrbach, Andrew) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 441 MOTION in Limine to Preclude the Introduction of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements as a Sanction for Failing to Comply with This Court's September 3, 2021 Order. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 442 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Any Evidence Offered by the Government Pursuant to Fed. R. Evid. 404(b) for Failure to Comply with the Rule's Notice Requirement. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 443 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Under Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993) and Request for Daubert Hearing. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2)(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 444 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence Related to Accuser-3. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Filed under Seal, # 2 Exhibit B - Filed under Seal)(Everdell, Christian) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
11/12/2021 445 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Government Exhibit 52, an Unauthenticated Hearsay Document from Suspect Sources. Document filed by Ghislaine Maxwell. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 (Filed Under Seal), # 2 Exhibit 2 (Filed Under Seal))(Pagliuca, Jeffrey) (Entered: 11/12/2021)
https://ecf.nysd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/DktRpt.pl?211087015221896-L_1_0-1
66/113
DOJ-OGR-00020688

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document