HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014076.jpg

1.59 MB

Extraction Summary

4
People
5
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal journal article / law review (page 97) included in house oversight committee productions
File Size: 1.59 MB
Summary

This document is a page from a legal journal (2014) analyzing Crime Victims' Rights (CVRA) and is part of a House Oversight Committee production. It specifically critiques the Department of Justice's handling of the Epstein case, noting that while the FBI and U.S. Attorney's Office initially notified victims (Jane Doe #1 and #2) of their rights in June 2007, the Department later 'reversed course' regarding the applicability of the CVRA during litigation. The text highlights a specific letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney A. Marie Villafaña to a victim sent months before the nonprosecution agreement was signed.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Epstein Subject of investigation
Mentioned regarding the nonprosecution agreement and the application of CVRA rights in his case.
Jane Doe Number One Victim
Notified by FBI/US Attorney's office of her rights and that the case was under investigation.
Jane Doe Number Two Victim
Notified by FBI that she had rights in the criminal justice process.
A. Marie Villafaña Assistant U.S. Attorney
Author of the letter sent to Jane Doe #1 on June 7, 2007 (cited in footnote 215).

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice
Referred to as 'the Department'; discussed regarding notification letters and reversing course on CVRA interpretation.
FBI
Notified Jane Does of their rights; assumed CVRA applied in the Epstein case.
U.S. Attorney’s Office
Sent notice to Jane Doe Number One.
OLC
Office of Legal Counsel; referenced regarding a memorandum causing problems with CVRA interpretation.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document production (stamped in footer).

Timeline (2 events)

2007 (approximate)
Conclusion of nonprosecution agreement with Epstein (noted as occurring more than three months after June 7, 2007).
Federal Jurisdiction
Epstein U.S. Government
2007-06-07
U.S. Attorney's Office sent notice to Jane Doe Number One stating the case is under investigation.
Federal Jurisdiction (implied)
Jane Doe Number One U.S. Attorney's Office

Relationships (2)

A. Marie Villafaña Legal/Official Jane Doe Number One
Letter from Villafaña to Jane Doe #1 cited in footnote 215.
Epstein Legal Adversary U.S. Attorney's Office
Mention of nonprosecution agreement between Epstein and the government.

Key Quotes (5)

"As early as June 7, 2007—more than three months before it concluded a nonprosecution agreement with Epstein—the U.S. Attorney’s Office sent a notice to Jane Doe Number One stating 'your case is under investigation.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014076.jpg
Quote #1
"The notice also informed Jane Doe Number One that 'as a victim and/or witness of a federal offense, you have a number of rights.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014076.jpg
Quote #2
"Among the rights that the U.S. Attorney’s Office told Jane Doe that she possessed was '[t]he reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case.'"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014076.jpg
Quote #3
"The FBI therefore apparently assumed that the CVRA already applied in the Epstein case."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014076.jpg
Quote #4
"It was only later, when the matter went into litigation, that the Department of Justice reversed course."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014076.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,652 characters)

2014]
CRIME VICTIMS’ RIGHTS
97
wanted to treat victims unfairly. Given its repeated and professed commitment to crime victims, here too this obligation should not be burdensome. And finally, with regard to providing notice of CVRA rights to victims, the fact that the Department currently provides notice of VRRA rights indicates that it should not be difficult to provide notice of CVRA rights as well.
Indeed, it is possible that the Department’s notification letters under the VRRA already include this information. Interestingly, in the Epstein case, the FBI notified Jane Doe Number One and Jane Doe Number Two that they had rights in the criminal justice process. As early as June 7, 2007—more than three months before it concluded a nonprosecution agreement with Epstein—the U.S. Attorney’s Office sent a notice to Jane Doe Number One stating “your case is under investigation.”215 The notice also informed Jane Doe Number One that “as a victim and/or witness of a federal offense, you have a number of rights.”216 Among the rights that the U.S. Attorney’s Office told Jane Doe that she possessed was “[t]he reasonable right to confer with the attorney for the United States in the case.”217 Of course, she would not have had those rights if she was not covered by the CVRA. The FBI therefore apparently assumed that the CVRA already applied in the Epstein case. It was only later, when the matter went into litigation, that the Department of Justice reversed course. This change in course underscores the problems arising out of the OLC memorandum and the Department’s current interpretation of the CVRA.
D. STATE LAW EXTENSION OF PRE-CHARGING RIGHTS
The focus of this Article so far has been crime victims’ rights in the federal system. But in concluding, it is instructive to note how a number of states offer parallel rights for crime victims, including the right to confer with prosecutors. In fact, several states have extended such rights prior to formally filing of charges against defendants—without reported difficulty, so far as we are aware. This confirms our inference that extending CVRA rights to crime victims before the formal filing of criminal charges is both feasible and desirable.
A general overview of state laws illustrates the broad protections afforded to victims in state criminal justice systems. Nearly two-thirds of states have adopted constitutional provisions to protect victims throughout
_________________________________
215 Letter from A. Marie Villafaña, Assistant U.S. Att’y, to Jane Doe #1 (June 7, 2007), reprinted in Jane Doe Motion, supra note 40, at ex. C.
216 Id.
217 Id.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014076

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document