This document is an email chain between attorney Jeffrey Pop and an Assistant U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of New York regarding the investigation into Jeffrey Epstein. Pop submits an Attorney Proffer detailing his client's interactions with Epstein, asserting she is a victim who was introduced to Epstein in New York (not involving minors) and suffers to this day. The SDNY prosecutor confirms that, based on current information, they do not believe the client has criminal exposure and discusses potential statutes of limitation.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Pop | Attorney |
Counsel for a female witness/victim; communicating with SDNY regarding an Attorney Proffer.
|
| [Redacted] (AUSA) | Assistant U.S. Attorney |
Prosecutor for the Southern District of New York; communicating with Pop about his client's status.
|
| Ms. [Redacted] (Client) | Witness/Victim |
Client of Jeffrey Pop; described as a victim who suffers to this day; involvement was in New York only.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Deceased financier; subject of the SDNY investigation.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District of New York (SDNY) |
U.S. Attorney's Office conducting the investigation.
|
|
| Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates |
Law firm representing the witness.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location of Jeffrey S. Pop & Associates office.
|
|
|
Location of SDNY; location where the client's involvement with Epstein occurred.
|
|
|
Location where Epstein was arrested (historical reference).
|
"My take away is that there is no doubt that [Redacted] is a victim; she suffers to this day."Source
"At the same time there were other people looking to introduce girls to Epstein. This pattern apparently was ongoing for decades."Source
"[Redacted] introduction involvement was only in New York and not with minors."Source
"we do not currently have reason to believe Ms. [Redacted] has criminal exposure based on what we are aware of in connection with her interactions with Jeffrey Epstein"Source
"I believe any non-federal offenses would be well outside the relevant statute(s) of limitation"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (4,941 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document