DOJ-OGR-00001093.jpg

654 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
4
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript / legal ruling
File Size: 654 KB
Summary

This document is a page from a court transcript dated April 1, 2021, concerning United States v. Maxwell. The judge is ruling against Ms. Maxwell's motion for release, stating that unlike other cases, she has not argued specific health vulnerabilities to COVID-19. The court also rejects the argument that prison restrictions at the MDC prevent her from preparing her defense, noting the case is in early stages.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
Subject of the detention hearing; denied release based on COVID-19 arguments.
Stephens Defendant (referenced case)
Defendant in United States v. Stephens, cited by defense as a precedent for release.
The Court (Judge) Judge
The speaker issuing the ruling (referred to as 'I' and 'this court').

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Bureau of Prisons
Government agency responsible for inmate safety.
MDC
Metropolitan Detention Center; the prison where Ms. Maxwell is held.
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting agency listed in the footer.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
Inferred from Bates stamp 'DOJ-OGR'.

Timeline (1 events)

04/01/2021
Court ruling denying Ms. Maxwell's request for release based on COVID-19 concerns.
Court (implied Southern District of New York based on reporter)
Ms. Maxwell The Court Defense Counsel

Locations (1)

Location Context
MDC
Prison facility where Ms. Maxwell is detained.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Maxwell Legal Representation Defense Counsel
Reference to 'the defense argues' on behalf of Ms. Maxwell.
Ms. Maxwell Detention MDC
Text states she is 'held' at the MDC.

Key Quotes (4)

"Ms. Maxwell has not argued that her age or underlying health conditions make her particularly susceptible to medical risk from the virus."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001093.jpg
Quote #1
"the COVID-19 pandemic alone does not provide grounds for her release."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001093.jpg
Quote #2
"Second, the defense argues that pretrial release is necessary for Ms. Maxwell to prepare her defense"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001093.jpg
Quote #3
"The case does stand in stark contrast to United States v. Stephens"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001093.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,779 characters)

Case 21-770, Document 20-2, 04/01/2021, 3068530, Page152 of 200 89
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 court is greatly concern by the Bureau of Prisons' ability to
2 keep inmates and detainees safe during the health crisis and
3 has found those considerations to be significant in other
4 cases. The argument nonetheless fails in this case for several
5 reasons. Most importantly, unlike almost all of the cases in
6 which this court has granted release as a result of COVID-19,
7 Ms. Maxwell has not argued that her age or underlying health
8 conditions make her particularly susceptible to medical risk
9 from the virus. In other words, she doesn't argue that she is
10 differently situated than many other federal inmates with
11 respect to the risk posed by COVID-19. In light of the
12 substantial reasons that I have already identified favoring
13 Ms. Maxwell's detention and her not making any arguments based
14 on her age or health, the COVID-19 pandemic alone does not
15 provide grounds for her release.
16 Second, the defense argues that pretrial release is
17 necessary for Ms. Maxwell to prepare her defense, as
18 COVID-19-related restrictions at the prison at which she is
19 held, the MDC, will hamper her ability to meet counsel and
20 review documents. The court notes that this case is at the
21 early stages. There will be no hearings, let alone a trial,
22 for a significant period of time. The case does stand in stark
23 contrast to United States v. Stephens, invoked by the defense,
24 in which this court at the beginning of the pandemic granted
25 temporary release to a defendant who was scheduled to have an
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001093

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document