DOJ-OGR-00001951.jpg

649 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court transcript
File Size: 649 KB
Summary

This document is page 74 of a court transcript from the case United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell (1:20-cr-00330-AJN), filed on December 10, 2020. A government prosecutor is arguing before the judge that Jeffrey Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) does not protect the defendant (Maxwell) and asserting that the agreement does not bind the current office. The prosecutor further argues against bail, citing the defendant's extensive international ties, unknown finances, and lack of candor regarding resources to flee.

People (4)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Referred to as 'the defendant' and 'her'. The case number 1:20-cr-00330-AJN corresponds to U.S. v. Ghislaine Maxwell....
Jeffrey Epstein Deceased Finance/Sex Offender
Mentioned regarding his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) and the fact that he was not a foreign citizen.
The Court / Your Honor Judge
Addressed by the speaker (Prosecution) regarding the decision on bail.
Unidentified Prosecutor Speaker
Represents 'the government' or 'this office', arguing against the NPA applicability and against bail.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Southern District Reporters, P.C.
Court reporting service listed in the footer.
The Government / This Office
Refers to the U.S. Attorney's Office (likely SDNY based on footer context) prosecuting the case.
The Defense
Legal team representing the defendant.

Timeline (1 events)

2020-12-10
Court hearing (likely Bail/Detention hearing) in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN.
Courtroom (likely SDNY)
Government Prosecution Defense Counsel Judge

Locations (1)

Location Context
Implied by 'Southern District Reporters' and the case jurisdiction.

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Legal/Criminal Association Jeffrey Epstein
Defense is arguing Epstein's NPA shields Maxwell from prosecution.
Government Adversarial Ghislaine Maxwell
Government arguing for detention and against the applicability of the NPA to the defendant.

Key Quotes (4)

"Jeffrey Epstein was not a foreign citizen."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001951.jpg
Quote #1
"the defense has articulated no legal basis to suggest that the defendant is shielded by the nonprosecution agreement"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001951.jpg
Quote #2
"this is the government's strong view that that agreement does not bind this office whatsoever with respect to any kind of conduct or any kind of individual."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001951.jpg
Quote #3
"But when you review the totality of the circumstances -- the defendant's extensive international ties, her conduct over the past year, her unknown finances and unwillingness to be more candid with the court about her resources to flee"
Source
DOJ-OGR-00001951.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,808 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 93 Filed 12/10/20 Page 74 of 91 74
k7e2MaxC kjc
1 detention was appropriate in that case on risk of flight alone.
2 And, again, that conduct was -- at that point significant time
3 had passed, and Jeffrey Epstein was not a foreign citizen.
4 I want to respond with respect to the NPA. At this
5 point, your Honor, the defense has articulated no legal basis
6 to suggest that the defendant is shielded by the nonprosecution
7 agreement, and it simply doesn't make sense that the decision
8 in this case is somehow tactical to avoid concerns about the
9 NPA, when the government charged Jeffrey Epstein with conduct
10 that fell within the scope of the time period within the
11 nonprosecution agreement and stated before the court in
12 connection with bail proceedings in that matter that this is
13 the government's strong view that that agreement does not bind
14 this office whatsoever with respect to any kind of conduct or
15 any kind of individual. That agreement does not bind this
16 office whatsoever.
17 Your Honor, in short, it is important for the court to
18 evaluate the question of bail given the totality of the
19 circumstances. The defense's argument, in essence, attempts to
20 view each of the government's arguments as absolute. But when
21 you review the totality of the circumstances -- the defendant's
22 extensive international ties, her conduct over the past year,
23 her unknown finances and unwillingness to be more candid with
24 the court about her resources to flee, her specific bail
25 proposal which provides absolutely no security to the court --
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00001951

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document