FL
LocationRelationship Network
Jeffrey Epstein Part 22 of 22.pdf
This document contains court filings from September 2009 regarding a dispute over the deposition of 'Jane Doe No. 4' in the civil case Jane Doe No. 2 v. Jeffrey Epstein. The plaintiff's attorney, Adam Horowitz, cancelled the deposition after an alleged intimidation incident where Epstein and his driver, Igor Zinoviev, crossed paths with the plaintiff in the building lobby. Epstein's legal team (Critton and Luttier) filed for sanctions, arguing the encounter was coincidental as Epstein was leaving his office (Florida Science Foundation, same building) to avoid the deposition. The document includes affidavits from Epstein and Zinoviev denying interaction, invoices for the cancelled deposition costs, and a 2008 plea conference transcript defining 'no contact' orders.
Jeffrey Epstein Part 18 of 18.PDF
This document is a collection of FBI and Palm Beach Police investigative materials regarding Jeffrey Epstein (File 31E-MM-108062). It includes FD-340 evidence logs, handwritten notes from interviews with victims or witnesses detailing interactions with Epstein (including massages, nudity, payments, and travel to New Mexico), subpoenas for subscriber information, MapQuest directions to 505 S Flagler Dr, and MySpace profile printouts. The handwritten notes contain significant allegations regarding Epstein's behavior, including asking for massages, comments about age ('I know you're not 18'), and controlling travel arrangements.
Jeffrey Epstein Part 02 of 08.pdf
This document collection details the FBI's investigation into Jeffrey Epstein for child prostitution between late 2006 and early 2007. It includes internal FBI communications requesting travel to interview witnesses in New York, New Jersey, New Mexico, and the US Virgin Islands, as well as indications of coordination with the Palm Beach Police Department. The file also contains financial request forms for investigative expenses and notes the creation of link analysis charts (i2 Analyst Notebook) to track the case data.
Epstein_Part_24_(Redacted).pdf
This document contains a series of miscellaneous notes and a car rental agreement. Key information includes a thank you note related to a car, scheduling details involving individuals named Dr. Beard, Soruch, and Britney, and instructions to re-rent a car from Dollar Rent A Car, with its contract expiring in February. The document also includes a standard car rental notice to renters regarding insurance and responsibilities.
Epstein_Part_02.pdf
This document contains a collection of FBI internal memos, electronic communications, and administrative forms related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein under Case ID 31E-MM-108062, covering late 2006 to early 2007. The files detail requests for travel concurrence to interview witnesses in various locations, the assignment of agents, the creation of analyst charts, and financial requests for expenses and search fees. A significant portion of the document consists of Deleted Page Information Sheets listing hundreds of pages withheld under FOIA exemptions.
053.pdf
This document is a court order from June 26, 2009, issued by Judge Jeffrey J. Colbath in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County, Florida. The order denies Jeffrey Epstein's motion to stay the disclosure of his Non-Prosecution Agreement and sets a deadline of July 2, 2009, for the Clerk to release the documents, allowing time for an appeal to the 4th DCA. The document includes a service list of attorneys involved, including U.S. Attorney R. Alexander Acosta and defense attorneys like Jack Goldberger.
047.pdf
Legal motion filed on June 25, 2009, by Jeffrey Epstein's defense team (Critton, Pike, Goldberger) in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. Epstein requests a stay on the disclosure of his Non-Prosecution Agreement (NPA) pending an appellate review, arguing that unsealing the document would cause irreparable harm to privacy rights and innocent third parties. The motion opposes efforts by the Palm Beach Post and a redacted non-party to unseal these court records.
041.pdf
This document is a 'Motion to Make Court Records Confidential' filed by Jeffrey Epstein's attorneys on June 11, 2009, in the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County. The defense seeks to maintain the seal on the Non-Prosecution Agreement (filed July 2008) and its Addendum, citing threats to the administration of justice and privacy rights of third parties. The motion references interventions by the Palm Beach Post and a non-party identified as 'EW' (whose name is redacted in one section) seeking access to these records.
014.pdf
This document is a plea agreement and sentencing order from the Circuit Court of Palm Beach County dated June 30, 2008. Jeffrey Epstein pleads guilty to Felony Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, receiving a sentence of 18 months in county detention followed by 12 months of community control. The order specifies strict conditions including house arrest at 358 El Brillo Way, sex offender registration, electronic monitoring, and a work-release arrangement allowing him to work at the 'Florida Science Foundation' in West Palm Beach.
037-03.pdf
This document is a proposed order for the admission pro hac vice of attorney Christopher J. Orrico in the 'In re JP Morgan Chase & Co. Derivative Litigation'. It grants Orrico, of the firm Grant & Eisenhofer P.A., permission to represent the plaintiff, Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund, in the Southern District of New York. The document provides Orrico's contact information and confirms his standing in the bars of New York and Connecticut.
002.pdf
This document is a Civil Cover Sheet (Form JS 44) and an attached list of defendants filed on May 9, 2023, in the Southern District of New York. The filing initiates a derivative lawsuit by 'Operating Engineers Construction Industry and Miscellaneous Pension Fund' against the board and executives of JPMorgan Chase & Co., including Jamie Dimon and Jes Staley. The cover sheet notes the case is related to existing cases 22-10019 (USVI v. JPM) and 22-10904 (Doe v. JPM) presided over by Judge Jed S. Rakoff, which were high-profile lawsuits concerning JPMorgan's relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
036.pdf
A legal filing (Sur-Reply) by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys arguing that Plaintiff Bradley Edwards must produce solicitation letters sent to former Epstein employees and their responses. The defense argues Edwards waived work-product privilege by failing to produce a privilege log and that the letters sent to third parties do not constitute work product.
030.pdf
This document is a Civil Docket Report for Case No. 0:16-mc-61262-JG, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 13, 2016. The case involves Plaintiff Bradley J. Edwards filing a motion to quash a subpoena against Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell. The docket records various motions, including requests to seal exhibits and appear Pro Hac Vice, culminating in an order on December 22, 2016, to transfer the motion to the Southern District of New York to be handled as part of the case Giuffre v. Maxwell (1:15-cv-07433-RWS). The case was terminated in the Florida court on December 23, 2016.
023.pdf
This document is a formal notice filed on December 16, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell. It informs the court and opposing counsel (specifically Bradley J. Edwards' attorney Jack Scarola) that 'Exhibit B' related to a subpoena status notice has been filed under seal. The underlying case referenced is Virginia L. Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of New York.
022.pdf
This document is a motion filed on December 16, 2016, by Ghislaine Maxwell's attorneys in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file 'Exhibit B' under seal, noting that the exhibit is a sealed order from the Southern District of New York in the underlying 'Giuffre v. Maxwell' case. The document lists legal counsel for Maxwell and for Bradley J. Edwards, who is the subject of a subpoena in this miscellaneous action.
010.pdf
Declaration by Jeffrey S. Pagliuca, attorney for Ghislaine Maxwell, filed on June 30, 2016, in the Southern District of Florida. The document lists 18 exhibits (A-R) supporting Maxwell's opposition to Bradley J. Edwards' motion to quash a subpoena. Several exhibits are filed under seal, while others include procedural documents from related cases (Cassell v. Dershowitz, Epstein v. Rothstein, Jane Doe v. US) and communications regarding discovery and subpoenas.
006.pdf
This document is a motion filed on June 29, 2016, by attorneys for Ghislaine Maxwell in the Southern District of Florida. The motion requests permission to file specific exhibits (A, G, H, I, and N) under seal because they were designated as confidential in the underlying case (Giuffre v. Maxwell) in the Southern District of New York. The document includes a certificate of service indicating the motion was served electronically to attorney Jack Scarola representing Bradley J. Edwards.
001-03.pdf
This document is a subpoena issued by the US District Court (SDNY) on behalf of Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell to attorney Bradley J. Edwards in May 2016. It demands the production of various documents, including those related to previous litigation involving Jeffrey Epstein and Alan Dershowitz, communications with journalist Sharon Churcher, and records regarding the organization 'Victims Refuse Silence, Inc.' A check for $45.00 payable to Edwards is included, likely as a witness fee.
052.pdf
This document is a legal stipulation filed on November 5, 2021, in the Southern District of New York, regarding case 1:20-cv-02365-LJL-DCF. The plaintiff, 'Jane Doe,' voluntarily dismisses her claims with prejudice against the executors of Jeffrey Epstein's estate, Darren K. Indyke and Richard D. Kahn. The dismissal is agreed upon by counsel for both parties without costs to either side.
029.pdf
This document is a Notice of Motion filed on July 30, 2021, in the Southern District of New York (Case 1:20-cv-02365). Plaintiff Jane Doe is notifying the defendants (Executors of the Epstein Estate and various associated corporate entities) that she is moving the court for an order allowing her to proceed anonymously in the lawsuit.
027.pdf
This document is a legal letter filed on July 21, 2021, in the case of Jane Doe v. the Executors of the Estate of Jeffrey E. Epstein. Plaintiff's attorney, Daniel J. Kaiser, requests a one-week extension from Judge Debra C. Freeman to submit a motion for the Plaintiff to proceed anonymously, citing a scheduling conflict with an arbitration. The letter notes that the Defendants consent to this extension request.
052-02.pdf
This document is a legal declaration by Jane Doe No. 4, filed on July 29, 2009. The declarant states that three investigators working for Jeffrey Epstein have been harassing her former employer (Florida Realty), a former co-worker, and her ex-boyfriend, asking intrusive personal questions. She expresses fear that this conduct exposes her identity as a plaintiff in a sexual abuse lawsuit to her social circle, potentially damaging her future employment and educational opportunities.
040.pdf
This document is a 'Notice of Reliance' filed on June 19, 2009, in the case of Jane Doe II v. Jeffrey Epstein (Case No. 09-CIV-80469) in the Southern District of Florida. Epstein's legal team informs the court that despite the Plaintiff filing an Amended Memorandum of Law on June 12, 2009, Epstein will not file a new supplemental reply but will instead rely on his previous arguments filed on June 1, 2009. The document outlines the procedural history of the motion to dismiss and includes a certificate of service listing attorneys for both parties.
011-01.pdf
This document is a collection of court records from June 2008 regarding the sentencing of Jeffrey Epstein in Palm Beach County, Florida. It includes the Judgment and Sentence for charges of Felony Solicitation of Prostitution and Procuring a Person Under 18 for Prostitution, sentencing him to 18 months of community control and county jail time with work release. The documents also detail strict community control conditions, including sex offender registration, electronic monitoring, and employment at the Florida Science Foundation, as well as an order sealing a Non-Prosecution Agreement.
004.pdf
This is a Motion to Stay Proceedings filed on January 29, 2008, in the US District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Jane Doe's Mother (Intervenor-Plaintiff) requests the court pause the lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein until Jane Doe No. 1 turns 18 on May 13, 2008. The motion reveals that Jane Doe No. 1 is estranged from her father (who filed the suit) and that the father filed the suit without her knowledge or consent.
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein entity